are whites superior?

lieberalism

Active Member
Apr 20, 2007
511
54
28
does anyone deny that whites are intellectually superior than negroes, chinese, africans, etc? this is proven through history, but liberalist teachings want to hide it in their revisionism. there are no white countries where the natives live in huts or igloos or caves or in tree huts. white people got to the moon. white men invented calculus. white men found america. white men invented computers. why do liberals want to mess with this great race by allowing race mixing? why de-evolve the most inventive race on the planet?
 
before some lib says that native americans found america first, i am talking about using technology to sail across an ocean using your brain. i am NOT talking about a group of drunk indians who wandered around aimlessly and a part of an ocean happened to be ice so they could walk across it. native americans probably were drunk or high the whole time, so it is hardly an achievement to get lost and end up on a new continent.
 
There is no scientific evidence the claim is true. You are aware of course that the Chinese and the Egyptians had advanced civilizations while "whites" were living in caves and hovels right?
 
does anyone deny that whites are intellectually superior than negroes, chinese, africans, etc? this is proven through history, but liberalist teachings want to hide it in their revisionism. there are no white countries where the natives live in huts or igloos or caves or in tree huts. white people got to the moon. white men invented calculus. white men found america. white men invented computers. why do liberals want to mess with this great race by allowing race mixing? why de-evolve the most inventive race on the planet?

You actually believe this crap? :cuckoo:
 
I'm basing my claim on hard evidence from history. All of the tech and advanced thoughts we have are from white people. There was no racism or affirmative action when we all started out. By this I mean no one group started off with a known advantage. Whoever was smartest would prevail. Since white people came out on top and came up with the brightest ideas, it is safe to say they are the smartest. Ignoring this fact is ignorant and what liberal revisionists want to push onto all of us.
 
does anyone deny that whites are intellectually superior than negroes, chinese, africans, etc? this is proven through history, but liberalist teachings want to hide it in their revisionism. there are no white countries where the natives live in huts or igloos or caves or in tree huts. white people got to the moon. white men invented calculus. white men found america. white men invented computers. why do liberals want to mess with this great race by allowing race mixing? why de-evolve the most inventive race on the planet?

<center><h1><font color=red>TROLL!</font></h1></center>
 
where am i wrong? point out any errors in my facts.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n6_v43/ai_10650145/pg_2

In the recently completed international assessment of mathematics and science, 13-year-olds from nine different populations were studied by the U.S.-based Educational Testing Service. In math, the Koreans-the only East Asian group in the study-came in first (and the Americans last). In science, the Koreans came in second, a shade behind children from British Columbia. (The Americans were ninth.) …

basic finding: American kindergardeners are about equal to the Taiwanese in mathematical understanding but both are far behind the Japanese. By the fifth grade, the Taiwanese have pretty much caught up with the Japanese and the Americans trail far behind.
 
Too bad that is because of policies on how students are taught. Has nothing to do with what race is overall smarter. The japs push their kids pretty hard and the US doesn't.
 
does anyone deny that whites are intellectually superior than negroes, chinese, africans, etc? this is proven through history, but liberalist teachings want to hide it in their revisionism. there are no white countries where the natives live in huts or igloos or caves or in tree huts. white people got to the moon. white men invented calculus. white men found america. white men invented computers. why do liberals want to mess with this great race by allowing race mixing? why de-evolve the most inventive race on the planet?

Are you fucking high? Drunk? Off your meds?

Did you know, at a time when European sailors were navigating by keeping a watch for the shoreline in daylight, Polynesians were navigating a vast extent of the Pacific Ocean. The is some evidence that Polynesians had contact with the Chumash and Gabrielino Indian tribes of Southern California, between 500 and 700AD. Some scholars have recently made the claim that the Chinese discovered America decades before Vespucci or Columbus.

It is not a matter of the being the smartest, but more a matter of luck and a willingness to use your technologies in a manner that allows one civilization to conquer another. The Europeans were brutal in this respect. As a result of conquering other lands, the victors in turn gain the technological advances of the defeated civilization. The only true superiority one race or culture has over another is numbers, that and a willingness and desire to be brutal enough to overpower their neighbors. The civilization with the bigger army, with more men willing to fight and die will be the victor, that civilization will rise to the top.

No one group, race, culture, or civilization is inherently superior to another.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt View Post
There is no scientific evidence the claim is true. You are aware of course that the Chinese and the Egyptians had advanced civilizations while "whites" were living in caves and hovels right?

Liberal revisionism.

You must not have gotten much of an education.

There is evidence that suggests the ancient Egyptians were preforming brain surgery and eye surgery LONG before "whites" left their caves. The Chinese invented gunpowder LONG before the west even knew how to make iron. There is even evidence the Myians were an advanced race LONG before whites learned to farm.

Writing existed in North Africa long before whites were anything but tribal savages.

There is NOT ONE shred of real evidence that any "race" is inheriently smarter than any other "race". Spouting this garbage is not Conservative it is racist. Your a DISGRACE to your race and the political group you claim to belong to. Whats next? Some links to white supremecy groups?
 
The origins of algebra can be traced to the ancient Babylonians.

The earliest references to cataract surgery are found in Sanskrit manuscripts dating from the 5th century BC, which show that Susruta developed specialised instruments and performed the earliest eye surgery in India.
 
If you want an interesting definition of "superiority" go out in the Au outback with an aboriginal person. After about fifteen minutes you sort of realise that you're way out of your depth.

It's all about context.
 
Primitive "eye surgery," pyramids, etc. None of that is really a big deal. Stonehenge is a bigger feat than the pyramids in my opinion. I will give credit to algebra, although Euclid and Newton/Leibenwitz contributions were far far greater.

As for africa or china inventing writing or gunpowder a few years before whites did, big deal. As I said before, greek contributions to math, european enlightenment, invention of calculus, industrial revolution, the computer!, name a tech to come out of africa since "using stars to navigate seas instead of land" LOL.

The fact is that blacks are too animalistic to achieve anything intellectual. They are more brawn over brains. The orientals I will admit are smart, as are the indians (from india.) But south americans and africans are stupid in general. They mostly know about crime and how to avoid work.
 

Forum List

Back
Top