Are the anti-science zealots accepting anthropogenic climate change yet?

No, just 74 or so of them. Aided by politicians and bureaucrats who never say no to more power.

DURRRRRR
Do you realize that when you try to claim that only 74 climatologist's opinions make up the consensus we all love to talk about, when it has been REPEATEDLY pointed out that later studies, polls and surveys involved thousands of published scientists, that you look like a complete idiot and a liar?
 
Do you realize that when you try to claim that only 74 climatologist's opinions make up the consensus we all love to talk about, when it has been REPEATEDLY pointed out that later studies, polls and surveys involved thousands of published scientists, that you look like a complete idiot and a liar?



The same clowns, over and over, and over.
 
Do you conjure up a vast, nefarious global conspiracy by all the world's climatological authorities, academies, and organizations along with all the world's nations (excluding Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Eritrea, Yemen, and South Sudan) that respect their scientific findings, or do you simply fancy that you know more about climatology than all of them?

Money for nothing and chicks for free.
 
circus-charlie-chaplin.gif
 
No, just 74 or so of them. Aided by politicians and bureaucrats who never say no to more power.

DURRRRRR
It sounds like you fancy a global conspiracy by a vast cabal of disingenuous climatologists and complicit progressive politicians in cahoots - as well as considering yourself more knowledgeable in climatology than climatologists.
 
If that is what Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Eritrea, Yemen, and South Sudan are offering to you for denying science, I would not trust them if I were you.

Green idiots are throwing trillions of tax dollars around the globe.
All the third worlders are lining up with their hands out for their "share".
 
It sounds like you fancy a global conspiracy by a vast cabal of disingenuous climatologists and complicit progressive politicians in cahoots - as well as considering yourself more knowledgeable in climatology than climatologists.


Hey, remember when the experts all agreed that population growth would lead to famine in first world countries by the 1970s and they were calling for immediate and draconian population control as the only possible solution?
 
It sounds like you fancy a global conspiracy by a vast cabal of disingenuous climatologists and complicit progressive politicians in cahoots - as well as considering yourself more knowledgeable in climatology than climatologists.




Congrats. You finally figured it out.....

quote-climate-change-policy-is-about-how-we-redistribute-de-facto-the-world-s-wealth-ottmar-edenhofer-73-67-68.jpg
 
Hey, remember when the experts all agreed that population growth would lead to famine in first world countries by the 1970s and they were calling for immediate and draconian population control as the only possible solution?
Certainly, malthusians once feared such a catastrophe. The consequences of human overpopulation have not been as dire.

How does that nullify the reality of anthropogenic climate change for which we are already witnessing the predicted consequences?
 
Certainly, malthusians once feared such a catastrophe. The consequences of human overpopulation have not been as dire.

How does that nullify the reality of anthropogenic climate change for which we are already witnessing the predicted consequences?


Shows a pattern of similar behavior, all proving groundless in the fullness of time.


Hey, remember when the next big problem was the supposed coming Ice Age? I don't recall what the supposed solutions were. I would bet money that they involved massive government control, probably international.
 
Green idiots are throwing trillions of tax dollars around the globe.
All the third worlders are lining up with their hands out for their "share".
You are upset by the overwhelming evidence that industrial emissions into the atmosphere are impacting the atmosphere.

That obvious reality is just the way it is.
 
Shows a pattern of similar behavior, all proving groundless in the fullness of time.
If you presume all science that doesn't accommodate your ideological dogma must be wrong, you are wrong.

If you are waiting for the cumulative data regarding climate change to reverse direction, don't hold your breath - unless you find yourself underwater due to rising sea level, of course.
 
Why do you need to pretend that ideologues with no expertise in climatology know more about climatology than climatologists?

Do you fancy that arachnologists know more about economics than economists?

Exactly!

They didn't win the Nobel Prize like Michael Mann.
 
If you presume all science that doesn't accommodate your ideological dogma must be wrong, you are wrong.

If you are waiting for the cumulative data regarding climate change to reverse direction, don't hold your breath - unless you find yourself underwater due to rising sea level, of course.


Just think if we had done the "sensible" thing and listed to the experts and instituted draconic population control to avoid the famines of the 70s?

Crushing the rights of vast numbers of people, using massive government force to make them do what the "experts" wanted,


and for what? For a fear that never came true.
 

Forum List

Back
Top