Arctic sea ice hits a new low for January.

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Mar 16, 2010
59,455
6,792
1,900
The Good insane United states of America
Arctic sea ice hits a new low for January.



http://nsidc.org/arc...-in-the-arctic/


nuciYGi.png


We will see if this continues for the next few months to see if this is the lowest minimum or not.
 
Thev since that one satellite has been measuring Ice, if you ignore the fact that these government workers must lie or lose thier jobs.

January Arctic sea ice extent was the lowest in the satellite record,

Not the lowest in History, not even close.

Either wsy, they are liars.
 
"We will see if this continues for the next few months to see if this is the lowest minimum or not"

The lowest minimum has spoken. This is quite likely to continue.
 
"We will see if this continues for the next few months to see if this is the lowest minimum or not"

The lowest minimum has spoken. This is quite likely to continue.

Well they are adjusting everything they can get their hands on..

Sea_Ice_Extent_N_v2.png


Guess the adjustments to some of the sat data is chaning the metric by which it is judged.. I wonder why they failed to mention that the metric was changed?
 
Silly Billy, you say what?

You have absolutely no credibility. It is safe to say that anything you post is pulled out of your ass. Just look at the thread on the New Madrid fault entitled The Next Big One.

Silly Billy claimed that the quake caused huge hydrothermal explosion in Yellowstone. When challenged to site a source, he claimed it was from John Colter's journal. There is no record of John Colter ever keeping a journal, let alone being literate. Not only that, the Corps of Discovery lasted from 1803 to 1806. And John Colter left the mountains in 1810 and was in Missouri in 1812.

What we are seeing now in the Arctic is confirmed by all the satellites that various nations have observing the conditions there.
 
Thev since that one satellite has been measuring Ice, if you ignore the fact that these government workers must lie or lose thier jobs.

January Arctic sea ice extent was the lowest in the satellite record,

Not the lowest in History, not even close.

Either wsy, they are liars.
Hmmmm............. Working to be on peer level with Silly Billy for credibility? If so, you are achieving that goal.
 
Thev since that one satellite has been measuring Ice, if you ignore the fact that these government workers must lie or lose thier jobs.

January Arctic sea ice extent was the lowest in the satellite record,

Not the lowest in History, not even close.

Either wsy, they are liars.
Hmmmm............. Working to be on peer level with Silly Billy for credibility? If so, you are achieving that goal.

You idiots are so predictable.. Now Satellites are accurate to 100ths of an inch of ice volume? But not accurate for temperature? But your changes are pristine and needed while those on the temp side are not...

Just keep running in circles... ignorant fool.

ETA: Now this is funny.. NOAA is investigating senor drift problems in their Satellite data stating its too low and does not match actual readings...

NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record of Passive Microwave Sea Ice Concentration
 
Last edited:
Your reply says enough, no substan
Thev since that one satellite has been measuring Ice, if you ignore the fact that these government workers must lie or lose thier jobs.

January Arctic sea ice extent was the lowest in the satellite record,

Not the lowest in History, not even close.

Either wsy, they are liars.
Hmmmm............. Working to be on peer level with Silly Billy for credibility? If so, you are achieving that goal.

It is enough for me to see that Old Crock aint got nothing.

Either wat there is no denying that all these government workers got to go, they must lie to keep thier jobs. Time to end this huge monster called government that works againt us.
 
Impressive argument Ms Elektra.Just shove your head in the sand and say nya-
nya-nya-nya-nya-nya-nya...
 
Your reply says enough, no substan
Thev since that one satellite has been measuring Ice, if you ignore the fact that these government workers must lie or lose thier jobs.

January Arctic sea ice extent was the lowest in the satellite record,

Not the lowest in History, not even close.

Either wsy, they are liars.
Hmmmm............. Working to be on peer level with Silly Billy for credibility? If so, you are achieving that goal.

It is enough for me to see that Old Crock aint got nothing.

Either wat there is no denying that all these government workers got to go, they must lie to keep thier jobs. Time to end this huge monster called government that works againt us.
And replace it with what? Fruitloopy bastards like you that would make the US into the new North Korea?
 
Oh Gawd......not this shit again!!:up:


It's true...Anyone interested in watching planet will keep on doing so...Anyone that isn't probably will say what you just said.


Can you read a graph Matthew?? What is the percentage decrease since 1979??

Like a pack of isolated cannibals. You could make them piss their pants with a mirror and a flashlight..
 
Oh Gawd......not this shit again!!:up:


It's true...Anyone interested in watching planet will keep on doing so...Anyone that isn't probably will say what you just said.


Can you read a graph Matthew?? What is the percentage decrease since 1979??

Like a pack of isolated cannibals. You could make them piss their pants with a mirror and a flashlight..
Well, let's see. Maximum coverage from 1979 to 1989 was about 14.5 million square kilometers. For the last ten years, it has been about 13.5, so that is about a
 
Oh Gawd......not this shit again!!:up:


It's true...Anyone interested in watching planet will keep on doing so...Anyone that isn't probably will say what you just said.


Can you read a graph Matthew?? What is the percentage decrease since 1979??

Like a pack of isolated cannibals. You could make them piss their pants with a mirror and a flashlight..
Well, let's see. Maximum coverage from 1979 to 1989 was about 14.5 million square kilometers. For the last ten years, it has been about 13.5, so that is about a

.......................... You were sooo close to being right Roxy.. Go ahead use a calculator... :lmao:

What happpened there? A GW warming caused forest fire start in your den?
 
Oh Gawd......not this shit again!!:up:


It's true...Anyone interested in watching planet will keep on doing so...Anyone that isn't probably will say what you just said.


Can you read a graph Matthew?? What is the percentage decrease since 1979??

Like a pack of isolated cannibals. You could make them piss their pants with a mirror and a flashlight..
Well, let's see. Maximum coverage from 1979 to 1989 was about 14.5 million square kilometers. For the last ten years, it has been about 13.5, so that is about a

.......................... You were sooo close to being right Roxy.. Go ahead use a calculator... :lmao:

What happpened there? A GW warming caused forest fire start in your den?
No, a phone call came in from my brother about a funeral for a death in the family. Hit the post button without thinking about it.

So, the decline for the average for those ten year periods is about 7%. So, what has happened to the decline of the lowest extent, and how does that relate to the the decline of the highest extent?

For the lowest extent, in September, from 1979 to 1989, is about 5.25 million square kilometers. For 2005 to 2015, it is about 3.25 million square kilometers. That is about a 38% decline. That is very significant.

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.area.arctic.png
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top