What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Arctic sea ice hits a new low for January.

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Joined
Mar 16, 2010
Messages
59,455
Reaction score
6,765
Points
1,900
Location
The Good insane United states of America
Arctic sea ice hits a new low for January.



http://nsidc.org/arc...-in-the-arctic/


nuciYGi.png


We will see if this continues for the next few months to see if this is the lowest minimum or not.
 

skookerasbil

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
35,690
Reaction score
4,307
Points
1,140
Location
Not the middle of nowhere

elektra

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
9,311
Reaction score
1,355
Points
255
Location
Temecula California
Thev since that one satellite has been measuring Ice, if you ignore the fact that these government workers must lie or lose thier jobs.

January Arctic sea ice extent was the lowest in the satellite record,

Not the lowest in History, not even close.

Either wsy, they are liars.
 

Compost

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
9,357
Reaction score
4,444
Points
400
"We will see if this continues for the next few months to see if this is the lowest minimum or not"

The lowest minimum has spoken. This is quite likely to continue.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
25,557
Reaction score
12,542
Points
1,430
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
"We will see if this continues for the next few months to see if this is the lowest minimum or not"

The lowest minimum has spoken. This is quite likely to continue.

Well they are adjusting everything they can get their hands on..

Sea_Ice_Extent_N_v2.png


Guess the adjustments to some of the sat data is chaning the metric by which it is judged.. I wonder why they failed to mention that the metric was changed?
 

Old Rocks

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
59,931
Reaction score
7,718
Points
1,840
Location
Portland, Ore.
Silly Billy, you say what?

You have absolutely no credibility. It is safe to say that anything you post is pulled out of your ass. Just look at the thread on the New Madrid fault entitled The Next Big One.

Silly Billy claimed that the quake caused huge hydrothermal explosion in Yellowstone. When challenged to site a source, he claimed it was from John Colter's journal. There is no record of John Colter ever keeping a journal, let alone being literate. Not only that, the Corps of Discovery lasted from 1803 to 1806. And John Colter left the mountains in 1810 and was in Missouri in 1812.

What we are seeing now in the Arctic is confirmed by all the satellites that various nations have observing the conditions there.
 

Old Rocks

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
59,931
Reaction score
7,718
Points
1,840
Location
Portland, Ore.
Thev since that one satellite has been measuring Ice, if you ignore the fact that these government workers must lie or lose thier jobs.

January Arctic sea ice extent was the lowest in the satellite record,

Not the lowest in History, not even close.

Either wsy, they are liars.
Hmmmm............. Working to be on peer level with Silly Billy for credibility? If so, you are achieving that goal.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
25,557
Reaction score
12,542
Points
1,430
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
Thev since that one satellite has been measuring Ice, if you ignore the fact that these government workers must lie or lose thier jobs.

January Arctic sea ice extent was the lowest in the satellite record,

Not the lowest in History, not even close.

Either wsy, they are liars.
Hmmmm............. Working to be on peer level with Silly Billy for credibility? If so, you are achieving that goal.

You idiots are so predictable.. Now Satellites are accurate to 100ths of an inch of ice volume? But not accurate for temperature? But your changes are pristine and needed while those on the temp side are not...

Just keep running in circles... ignorant fool.

ETA: Now this is funny.. NOAA is investigating senor drift problems in their Satellite data stating its too low and does not match actual readings...

NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record of Passive Microwave Sea Ice Concentration
 
Last edited:

Wuwei

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2015
Messages
4,398
Reaction score
656
Points
255

elektra

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
9,311
Reaction score
1,355
Points
255
Location
Temecula California
Your reply says enough, no substan
Thev since that one satellite has been measuring Ice, if you ignore the fact that these government workers must lie or lose thier jobs.

January Arctic sea ice extent was the lowest in the satellite record,

Not the lowest in History, not even close.

Either wsy, they are liars.
Hmmmm............. Working to be on peer level with Silly Billy for credibility? If so, you are achieving that goal.

It is enough for me to see that Old Crock aint got nothing.

Either wat there is no denying that all these government workers got to go, they must lie to keep thier jobs. Time to end this huge monster called government that works againt us.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,863
Reaction score
1,774
Points
290
Location
N/A
Impressive argument Ms Elektra.Just shove your head in the sand and say nya-
nya-nya-nya-nya-nya-nya...
 

Old Rocks

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
59,931
Reaction score
7,718
Points
1,840
Location
Portland, Ore.
Your reply says enough, no substan
Thev since that one satellite has been measuring Ice, if you ignore the fact that these government workers must lie or lose thier jobs.

January Arctic sea ice extent was the lowest in the satellite record,

Not the lowest in History, not even close.

Either wsy, they are liars.
Hmmmm............. Working to be on peer level with Silly Billy for credibility? If so, you are achieving that goal.

It is enough for me to see that Old Crock aint got nothing.

Either wat there is no denying that all these government workers got to go, they must lie to keep thier jobs. Time to end this huge monster called government that works againt us.
And replace it with what? Fruitloopy bastards like you that would make the US into the new North Korea?
 

flacaltenn

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
62,129
Reaction score
17,182
Points
2,180
Location
Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
Oh Gawd......not this shit again!!:up:


It's true...Anyone interested in watching planet will keep on doing so...Anyone that isn't probably will say what you just said.


Can you read a graph Matthew?? What is the percentage decrease since 1979??

Like a pack of isolated cannibals. You could make them piss their pants with a mirror and a flashlight..
 

saveliberty

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
57,897
Reaction score
9,724
Points
2,030
Polar bear float by your house again?
 

Old Rocks

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
59,931
Reaction score
7,718
Points
1,840
Location
Portland, Ore.
Oh Gawd......not this shit again!!:up:


It's true...Anyone interested in watching planet will keep on doing so...Anyone that isn't probably will say what you just said.


Can you read a graph Matthew?? What is the percentage decrease since 1979??

Like a pack of isolated cannibals. You could make them piss their pants with a mirror and a flashlight..
Well, let's see. Maximum coverage from 1979 to 1989 was about 14.5 million square kilometers. For the last ten years, it has been about 13.5, so that is about a
 

flacaltenn

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
62,129
Reaction score
17,182
Points
2,180
Location
Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
Oh Gawd......not this shit again!!:up:


It's true...Anyone interested in watching planet will keep on doing so...Anyone that isn't probably will say what you just said.


Can you read a graph Matthew?? What is the percentage decrease since 1979??

Like a pack of isolated cannibals. You could make them piss their pants with a mirror and a flashlight..
Well, let's see. Maximum coverage from 1979 to 1989 was about 14.5 million square kilometers. For the last ten years, it has been about 13.5, so that is about a

.......................... You were sooo close to being right Roxy.. Go ahead use a calculator... :lmao:

What happpened there? A GW warming caused forest fire start in your den?
 

Old Rocks

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
59,931
Reaction score
7,718
Points
1,840
Location
Portland, Ore.
Oh Gawd......not this shit again!!:up:


It's true...Anyone interested in watching planet will keep on doing so...Anyone that isn't probably will say what you just said.


Can you read a graph Matthew?? What is the percentage decrease since 1979??

Like a pack of isolated cannibals. You could make them piss their pants with a mirror and a flashlight..
Well, let's see. Maximum coverage from 1979 to 1989 was about 14.5 million square kilometers. For the last ten years, it has been about 13.5, so that is about a

.......................... You were sooo close to being right Roxy.. Go ahead use a calculator... :lmao:

What happpened there? A GW warming caused forest fire start in your den?
No, a phone call came in from my brother about a funeral for a death in the family. Hit the post button without thinking about it.

So, the decline for the average for those ten year periods is about 7%. So, what has happened to the decline of the lowest extent, and how does that relate to the the decline of the highest extent?

For the lowest extent, in September, from 1979 to 1989, is about 5.25 million square kilometers. For 2005 to 2015, it is about 3.25 million square kilometers. That is about a 38% decline. That is very significant.

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.area.arctic.png
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$280.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top