Apparently, Australian gun grabbers have to lie about guns too...

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
112,365
52,611
2,290
This commentary shows that gun grabbers the world over have to lie and use emotion...since the truth about gun ownership around the world is the same......normal gun owners are not a problem no matter how many guns they own. Taking guns away from normal, law abiding people does nothing to lower the gun murder rate or the gun crime rate.......

When you take guns away from law abiding people..only cops and criminals will have guns....and the criminals will still use the guns to commit crimes....

Category: | The Mercury

There has not been a repeat despite citizens having access to the same types of firearms used by Anders Brievek and Martin Bryant.

New Zealand has not had a mass shooting since 1997 and likewise allows its citizens the same semiautomatic, high-powered firearms as do some European countries.

The proposition you can vicariously control criminal or psychopathic behaviour by confiscating private property and burying law-abiding citizens under a mountain of regulation is simply absurd.

Former Australian prime minister John Howard has claimed success because there had not been another mass shooting.


The reality is last year we had our first mass shooting (four or more victims in a single incident) when a man shot his wife and three children before taking his own life at Lockhart, NSW.

Mental health issues were a factor and firearms had been confiscated from this house previously.

Since the National Firearms Agreement, we have had seven massacres resulting in 62 victims and 17 were children. Only one of these murder sprees involved the perpetrator using a firearm.

It is irrelevant whether the murders were carried out with a firearm or any other method, the end result was exactly the same for the family, friends and community.



And look......they have the exact problem that the United States has....and no problem with normal gun owners.......

n 2008, researchers Jack Dearden and Warwick Jones, working for the Australian Institute of Criminology, reported that 93 per cent of gun murders involved an unlicensed perpetrator with an unregistered firearm.

Our gun laws completely miss the mark when you realise the chance of any one of Australia’s 800,000 licensed gun owners committing murder are so minuscule that you are more likely to die from a bee sting.



 
Last edited:
And look at this......lying is a trait among left wingers in general, and mastered by anti gunners in pariticular.....

To massage the numbers, prohibitionists refer to gun deaths rather than murders, this means they include suicides and they ignore method substitution. In any case, suicides are a mental health issue, not a gun issue.

As a proportion of murders, gun murders have decreased since 1969, when they were 44 per cent of deaths well before the NFA, to the 14 per cent they are at currently.


Isn't it funny that the gun grabbers around the world all use the same tactic.....they all lie about the truth by lumping all gun deaths together to get their numbers higher....
 
This commentary shows that gun grabbers the world over have to lie and use emotion...
---
"Gun grabbers" vs gun fanatics.
LOL.
Both use emotions.
.


Nope......the supporters of the 2nd Amendment use facts.....every single post....the gun grabbers then deny those facts, then lie, or drag dead bodies out for the emotional impact.....
 
This commentary shows that gun grabbers the world over have to lie and use emotion...since the truth about gun ownership around the world is the same......normal gun owners are not a problem no matter how many guns they own. Taking guns away from normal, law abiding people does nothing to lower the gun murder rate or the gun crime rate.......

When you take guns away from law abiding people..only cops and criminals will have guns....and the criminals will still use the guns to commit crimes....

Category: | The Mercury

There has not been a repeat despite citizens having access to the same types of firearms used by Anders Brievek and Martin Bryant.

New Zealand has not had a mass shooting since 1997 and likewise allows its citizens the same semiautomatic, high-powered firearms as do some European countries.

The proposition you can vicariously control criminal or psychopathic behaviour by confiscating private property and burying law-abiding citizens under a mountain of regulation is simply absurd.

Former Australian prime minister John Howard has claimed success because there had not been another mass shooting.


The reality is last year we had our first mass shooting (four or more victims in a single incident) when a man shot his wife and three children before taking his own life at Lockhart, NSW.

Mental health issues were a factor and firearms had been confiscated from this house previously.

Since the National Firearms Agreement, we have had seven massacres resulting in 62 victims and 17 were children. Only one of these murder sprees involved the perpetrator using a firearm.

It is irrelevant whether the murders were carried out with a firearm or any other method, the end result was exactly the same for the family, friends and community.



And look......they have the exact problem that the United States has....and no problem with normal gun owners.......

n 2008, researchers Jack Dearden and Warwick Jones, working for the Australian Institute of Criminology, reported that 93 per cent of gun murders involved an unlicensed perpetrator with an unregistered firearm.

Our gun laws completely miss the mark when you realise the chance of any one of Australia’s 800,000 licensed gun owners committing murder are so minuscule that you are more likely to die from a bee sting.


Apparently, the thread premise fails as a straw man fallacy.

Apparently, given their propensity to lie, most on the right are in no position to accuse others of ‘lying’ – this thread being one of many examples of a rightwing lie.
 
This commentary shows that gun grabbers the world over have to lie and use emotion...
---
"Gun grabbers" vs gun fanatics.
LOL.
Both use emotions.
.


Nope......the supporters of the 2nd Amendment use facts.....every single post....the gun grabbers then deny those facts, then lie, or drag dead bodies out for the emotional impact.....
There are no ‘gun grabbers,’ the notion is another ridiculous lie from the right.

No one advocates that government be authorized to ‘take’ anyone’s guns – in addition to being a moronic lie, it would be legally and Constitutionally impossible to ‘take’ anyone’s guns, any such measure would be immediately invalidated by the courts as a violation of the Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution.

Ignorance, fear, and lies is all you have, and no one believes your ignorant, ridiculous lies.
 
This commentary shows that gun grabbers the world over have to lie and use emotion...
---
"Gun grabbers" vs gun fanatics.
LOL.
Both use emotions.
.


Nope......the supporters of the 2nd Amendment use facts.....every single post....the gun grabbers then deny those facts, then lie, or drag dead bodies out for the emotional impact.....
There are no ‘gun grabbers,’ the notion is another ridiculous lie from the right.

No one advocates that government be authorized to ‘take’ anyone’s guns – in addition to being a moronic lie, it would be legally and Constitutionally impossible to ‘take’ anyone’s guns, any such measure would be immediately invalidated by the courts as a violation of the Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution.

Ignorance, fear, and lies is all you have, and no one believes your ignorant, ridiculous lies.
Why do the anti-gun nutter constantly bring up ''common sense gun laws'' then?
There zero ''common sense'' in what they purpose...
The anti-gun nutters start their whole argument with an absolute lie by putting homicides, suicides an accidental death's all in the same category - gun violence… Fucking spineless cowards.
Violence does not need permission from guns to happen… LOL
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top