Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
there is an ethics probe for illegal gifts , in particular around her Meta Gala tripI just tried googling that and while it looks like she isn't paying her bills in a timely way, I don't see any allegations of "illegal gifts".
Why do we still seem to be enamored with AOC? She has been proven herself to be the least effective member of the House (thank God!). She is dumber than shit. Nobody doubt’s that she is utilized by the neo-Marxist revolutionaries as a useful fool to pimp their destructive ideology. She is emotionally stunted, etc… So why is she still a darling of the press? I will tell you why.
This is still largely a man’s world, and the overwhelming majority of men in this world, regardless of whether they agree with AOC’s stupid politics, want to paint her light-brown face pearl white. It’s just the way it is. I think she is a shit head, and that the stupid shit she says makes her less attractive to me. But I would still hit that. I would scorch that cooter without a second thought. But I digress.
I strongly suspect that her insidious ideological pimps, the Marxist “Justice Democrats”, picked AOC for this purpose (and because she is lobotomy-stupid and will, therefore, say whatever they tell her to say). She is like a Trojan horse, with big juicy tits.
Do you know what “democratic socialism” really is? I do not mean its academic definition, or some perverted interpretation thereof. I mean, do you REALLY know what it is? I am going to tell you. If you listen closely to the words spoken in the speeches of Lenin and Trotsky you will hear them talk about “the people” being authorized in their system to decide what shall be done with the wealth of the Soviet Union (e.g., means of production, national resources, etc...). The people decide. The people, as a collective, are empowered to allocate wealth and resources. This appealed to the long-suffering people there. And why wouldn’t it? The people in Russia at that time were starving peasants put through war and living under a Czar that had much, generating class envy. The Bolsheviks took advantage of this to inject their venom into the body politic.
Lenin’s use of this idea – that “the people” would decide how to allocate resources; i.e., democratic socialism – was intentional in order to attract people to his ideology and to party. It was a trick. It was also a lie. It was a fake and ongoing “revolution” (a communist idea necessary to perpetuate the cause). In practice, however, it is pure authoritarianism.
Everyone who desires freedom should ALWAYS beware of any ideology that stresses the value of the collective over the individual. Our Founders were all too aware of the evils that may arise when political power is allowed to be concentrated in one, or very few, areas in the state. The remedy is to decentralize power, and then enforce a system of decentralized power. Essentially, you are enforcing a system that will allow individuals to be free, or at least enjoy the degree of freedom guaranteed by no other political system in the world, ever.
The collective, however, overrides the interest in the individual and instead focuses on the group. The state rewards those in a group, encouraging people to identify as a group rather than as an individual. This strengthens the group and allows it to be directed by a small number of people. You see this model in wide use today in America. It is toxic to the founding principles of decentralized power and individualism. It is a danger to the Republic and, therefore, a danger to the freedom of you and I.
Does AOC understand this? Does she understand the implication of her stupid rhetoric? Of course not! She is dumb as a stump. She is a zombie sheep that foolishly believes that democratic socialism is a true and viable political paradigm. The Bolshevik sheep believed this too.
AOC does not know what the fuck she is talking about. Neither do most of the talking heads in the media when it comes to this stuff. They ask, “Don’t you want to take the power of the capitalist corporate overlords to determine your fate away from them?” But if you read between the lines (and lies) what they are really asking is “Don’t you want to cede your individual autonomy, as largely guaranteed by the American Constitution, to a centralized authoritarian regime who will control every aspect of your life?”
“Democratic socialism” is not real. It is a rhetorical construct, seemingly legitimized in the minds of idiots due to the academic blatherings about it. The idea for such a unicorn utopian existence has been around for well over a century. But have you ever seen it in practice? Of course not. This is because for any democratic system to work there must be a substantial amount of power vested in the individual, independent of any sort of collective interest. “Democratic socialism” is fundamentally, and fatally, flawed in this way. The idea that DS is a legitimate, sustainable form of governance is asinine. It is illogical. It is untried. And it is totally and completely embraced by AOC. What a stupid fucking idiot.
haha yeah capitalist loves stalin…right before he took over their homes and businesses for the good of the stateSure the idea of democratic socialism was a trick or lie, but NOT by the democratic socialists who Stalin had all murdered. It was a trick by the capitalists, who financed and supported Stalin.
The reality is that democratic socialism is easily identifiable by the fact it relies on local input and sharing.
When government and corporations are large, distant, and profit motivated, like under Stalin, then it is pure capitalism.
haha yeah capitalist loves stalin…right before he took over their homes and businesses for the good of the state
haha are you an idiot?
haha he took the factories from the capitalist, and their homes, and all their property…cause that’s what socialist doThat is silly.
Capitalists always hate each other, because they are the competition.
Obviously Stalin did NOTHING "for the good of the state".
He deliberately made production more difficult, by moving the factories producing parts for one item, to far flung locations. That was so no one single location could ever try to become self sufficient and want to separate themselves.
That is the opposite of socialism, and is extreme capitalism.
With socialism you would let the local people decide what they needed and wanted.
haha he took the factories from the capitalist, and their homes, and all their property…cause that’s what socialist do
WrongWrong.
Socialism can not and does not "take" anything, ever.
Socialism means the community invests into a public enterprise that its members pay for.
An example, are public schools.
There were no schools "taken" in order to do that, and there still are lots of private schools.
What Stalin did was neither socialism nor communism, but was pure capitalism.
Taking by force, in order to gain profit, is capitalism.
Every dictator, monarch, pirate, colonial imperialist, etc., is a profit motivated capitalist.
Yes Stalin was a communist who ryuled the state with an iron fist which is what communism demands.That is silly.
Capitalists always hate each other, because they are the competition.
Obviously Stalin did NOTHING "for the good of the state".
He deliberately made production more difficult, by moving the factories producing parts for one item, to far flung locations. That was so no one single location could ever try to become self sufficient and want to separate themselves.
That is the opposite of socialism, and is extreme capitalism.
With socialism you would let the local people decide what they needed and wanted.
No democratic socialists were murdered by StalinSure the idea of democratic socialism was a trick or lie, but NOT by the democratic socialists who Stalin had all murdered. It was a trick by the capitalists, who financed and supported Stalin.
The reality is that democratic socialism is easily identifiable by the fact it relies on local input and sharing.
When government and corporations are large, distant, and profit motivated, like under Stalin, then it is pure capitalism.
this ill shock you but when people do something illegal they dont post in on the world wide web....duhI just tried googling that and while it looks like she isn't paying her bills in a timely way, I don't see any allegations of "illegal gifts".
Why do we still seem to be enamored with AOC? She has been proven herself to be the least effective member of the House (thank God!). She is dumber than shit. Nobody doubt’s that she is utilized by the neo-Marxist revolutionaries as a useful fool to pimp their destructive ideology. She is emotionally stunted, etc… So why is she still a darling of the press? I will tell you why.
This is still largely a man’s world, and the overwhelming majority of men in this world, regardless of whether they agree with AOC’s stupid politics, want to paint her light-brown face pearl white. It’s just the way it is. I think she is a shit head, and that the stupid shit she says makes her less attractive to me. But I would still hit that. I would scorch that cooter without a second thought. But I digress.
I strongly suspect that her insidious ideological pimps, the Marxist “Justice Democrats”, picked AOC for this purpose (and because she is lobotomy-stupid and will, therefore, say whatever they tell her to say). She is like a Trojan horse, with big juicy tits.
Do you know what “democratic socialism” really is? I do not mean its academic definition, or some perverted interpretation thereof. I mean, do you REALLY know what it is? I am going to tell you. If you listen closely to the words spoken in the speeches of Lenin and Trotsky you will hear them talk about “the people” being authorized in their system to decide what shall be done with the wealth of the Soviet Union (e.g., means of production, national resources, etc...). The people decide. The people, as a collective, are empowered to allocate wealth and resources. This appealed to the long-suffering people there. And why wouldn’t it? The people in Russia at that time were starving peasants put through war and living under a Czar that had much, generating class envy. The Bolsheviks took advantage of this to inject their venom into the body politic.
Lenin’s use of this idea – that “the people” would decide how to allocate resources; i.e., democratic socialism – was intentional in order to attract people to his ideology and to party. It was a trick. It was also a lie. It was a fake and ongoing “revolution” (a communist idea necessary to perpetuate the cause). In practice, however, it is pure authoritarianism.
Everyone who desires freedom should ALWAYS beware of any ideology that stresses the value of the collective over the individual. Our Founders were all too aware of the evils that may arise when political power is allowed to be concentrated in one, or very few, areas in the state. The remedy is to decentralize power, and then enforce a system of decentralized power. Essentially, you are enforcing a system that will allow individuals to be free, or at least enjoy the degree of freedom guaranteed by no other political system in the world, ever.
The collective, however, overrides the interest in the individual and instead focuses on the group. The state rewards those in a group, encouraging people to identify as a group rather than as an individual. This strengthens the group and allows it to be directed by a small number of people. You see this model in wide use today in America. It is toxic to the founding principles of decentralized power and individualism. It is a danger to the Republic and, therefore, a danger to the freedom of you and I.
Does AOC understand this? Does she understand the implication of her stupid rhetoric? Of course not! She is dumb as a stump. She is a zombie sheep that foolishly believes that democratic socialism is a true and viable political paradigm. The Bolshevik sheep believed this too.
AOC does not know what the fuck she is talking about. Neither do most of the talking heads in the media when it comes to this stuff. They ask, “Don’t you want to take the power of the capitalist corporate overlords to determine your fate away from them?” But if you read between the lines (and lies) what they are really asking is “Don’t you want to cede your individual autonomy, as largely guaranteed by the American Constitution, to a centralized authoritarian regime who will control every aspect of your life?”
“Democratic socialism” is not real. It is a rhetorical construct, seemingly legitimized in the minds of idiots due to the academic blatherings about it. The idea for such a unicorn utopian existence has been around for well over a century. But have you ever seen it in practice? Of course not. This is because for any democratic system to work there must be a substantial amount of power vested in the individual, independent of any sort of collective interest. “Democratic socialism” is fundamentally, and fatally, flawed in this way. The idea that DS is a legitimate, sustainable form of governance is asinine. It is illogical. It is untried. And it is totally and completely embraced by AOC. What a stupid fucking idiot.
this ill shock you but when people do something illegal they dont post in on the world wide web....duh
