Americas dumbest people

This is the danger of ignorance and in this case arrogant ignorance to humanity. I mean people living on a small island that refuse to believe a rising sea in front of their own eyes. Good lord this is such a rejection of reality it is hard to fathom. Make no mistake, human beings can be made to believe anything. If you said the words cognitive dissonance not a single one of them would know or care what it means.

This is like people sitting on the deck of the Titanic as the water rises to their feet and they're still sure the ship isn't sinking.
Yeah, ignorance. That's it!

There are plenty of rich muckity-mucks here in Murica, with lots and lots of extremely valuable seaside property. When they start selling for pennies on the dollar, you make sure to come warn us. Until such a time comes, you and the rest of your scaremongering moonbat brethren are the ignorant ones.
 
This is the danger of ignorance and in this case arrogant ignorance to humanity. I mean people living on a small island that refuse to believe a rising sea in front of their own eyes. Good lord this is such a rejection of reality it is hard to fathom. Make no mistake, human beings can be made to believe anything. If you said the words cognitive dissonance not a single one of them would know or care what it means.

This is like people sitting on the deck of the Titanic as the water rises to their feet and they're still sure the ship isn't sinking.
Yeah, ignorance. That's it!

There are plenty of rich muckity-mucks here in Murica, with lots and lots of extremely valuable seaside property. When they start selling for pennies on the dollar, you make sure to come warn us. Until such a time comes, you and the rest of your scaremongering moonbat brethren are the ignorant ones.

Again when people reject reality that is visible to anyone with sight it doesn't have anything to do with 'not having enough facts'. It has to do with abject fear of reality and dealing with it. You've checked the box you subscribe to.
 
This is the danger of ignorance and in this case arrogant ignorance to humanity. I mean people living on a small island that refuse to believe a rising sea in front of their own eyes. Good lord this is such a rejection of reality it is hard to fathom. Make no mistake, human beings can be made to believe anything. If you said the words cognitive dissonance not a single one of them would know or care what it means.

This is like people sitting on the deck of the Titanic as the water rises to their feet and they're still sure the ship isn't sinking.
Yeah, ignorance. That's it!

There are plenty of rich muckity-mucks here in Murica, with lots and lots of extremely valuable seaside property. When they start selling for pennies on the dollar, you make sure to come warn us. Until such a time comes, you and the rest of your scaremongering moonbat brethren are the ignorant ones.

Again when people reject reality that is visible to anyone with sight it doesn't have anything to do with 'not having enough facts'. It has to do with abject fear of reality and dealing with it. You've checked the box you subscribe to.
Is the sea rising in the Chesapeake, or is the Chesapeake Bay doing what it is known to do? USGS says it's the latter.

Learn a bit about the Chesapeake Bay...not just you...the OP is ignorant about it, too.
 
Again when people reject reality that is visible to anyone with sight it doesn't have anything to do with 'not having enough facts'. It has to do with abject fear of reality and dealing with it. You've checked the box you subscribe to.
The reality is that the real estate that is most vulnerable under your Chicken Little scenario is more valuable than ever. If you were right, rich people -who are certainly not dummies- would be abandoning the coasts in droves.

But they're not and you're still full of shit.
 
Yeah, because if the water is rising on the sides of your ship, that means the entire planet is sinking into ocean.

You are an idiot. You know that, don't you?

You believe an island is floating on water like a ship? Ok then Copernicus, sounds like you have all your planets aligned to Kolob. Good work and I like your tin-foil hat. Very stylish.

Is sea level changing on the shores of Chesapeake Bay right nearby? Er . . . . no, it isn't. But you, the rocket scientist, concludes it is because you live on an Island that's eroding away.
Smith Island, threatened by rising water and dwindling population, aims to shore up its future

The Baltimore Sun is a notorious left wing paper. I know because I used to live in Baltimore.
Irrelevant. Are the people spending 8.5 million to protect the shoreline from erosion or not?
They are protecting it from erosion, not global warming.
 



This is the danger of ignorance and in this case arrogant ignorance to humanity. I mean people living on a small island that refuse to believe a rising sea in front of their own eyes. Good lord this is such a rejection of reality it is hard to fathom. Make no mistake, human beings can be made to believe anything. If you said the words cognitive dissonance not a single one of them would know or care what it means.

This is like people sitting on the deck of the Titanic as the water rises to their feet and they're still sure the ship isn't sinking.

Yeah, because if the water is rising on the sides of your ship, that means the entire planet is sinking into ocean.

You are an idiot. You know that, don't you?


You believe an island is floating on water like a ship? Ok then Copernicus, sounds like you have all your planets aligned to Kolob. Good work and I like your tin-foil hat. Very stylish.


Is sea level changing on the shores of Chesapeake Bay right nearby? Er . . . . no, it isn't. But you, the rocket scientist, concludes it is because you live on an Island that's eroding away.

Fucking dumb shit. Don't you ever even research anything before you post your idiocy?

USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities Science Summary - Sea-Level Rise and Chesapeake Bay

Modern Sea-Level Rise

Two major factors contribute to global sea-level rise: thermal expansion from increasing ocean heat content, and the melting of glaciers and the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Since about 2003, glaciers and ice sheets (fig. 2) have contributed a greater proportion of the global sea-level rise than thermal expansion (Meier and others, 2007; Cogley, 2009; Rignot, Bamber, and others, 2008; Rignot, Box, and others, 2008). Today’s glaciers and ice sheets store enough water to raise sea level by about 68 to 70 m. Calculated rates of global mean sea-level rise range from 1.7 to 3.2 mm/yr, depending on the time period examined (Cazenave and Llovel, 2010; Church and White, 2011). Detecting fluctuations in the rate of sea-level change can be difficult as a result of the short period of record of tide gages and chronological uncertainty in marsh paleo-sea-level studies (Larsen and Clark, 2006). Some key findingsinclude:

  • Chesapeake Bay tide-gage records and paleo-sea-level records from tidal marshes and the bay’s main stem, determined from sediment cores collected from 1995 to 2006 (fig. 1), show that rates of sea-level rise in Chesapeake Bay range from about 3.2 to 4.7 mm/yr depending on the location and period of record for each tide gage. These rates exceed the global average because the land is subsiding; therefore, the Chesapeake Bay area is more vulnerable than many other coastal regions to sea-level rise.
  • The departure of sea-level trends in Chesapeake Bay from the global mean for the last century may not persist. Therefore, rates measured at tide gages do not necessarily reflect pre-20th century regional patterns, nor can they be expected to persist into the future.
  • Estimates of local subsidence from groundwater withdrawal in parts of Virginia are 1.5 and 3.7 mm/yr for 1979–95 and 1982–95, respectively (Pope and Burbey, 2004). Subsidence is expected to increase with greater withdrawals.
Projecting Future Sea-Level Rise

Projecting future sea-level rise is one of the most challenging aspects of the study of climate change. Although uncertainty remains great, empirical and modeling methods used in recent studies have provided new estimates of the cumulative rise in sea level by 2100 (Rahmstorf, 2007, 2010; Vermeer and Rahmstorf, 2009; Pfeffer and others, 2008; Bahr and others, 2009; Rignot and others, 2011). Some key findings include:

  • Evidence indicates a total rise of about 80 to 130 centimeters (cm), which is equivalent to annual rates of about 9 to 14 mm/yr, during the 21st century. Grinsted and others (2010) showed that sea-level rise could reach rates as high as 11 mm/yr by 2050. These values are estimated mean global rates and do not exclude the possibilities that slower or faster rates may persist for years to decades, that sea level may fall at times, or that regional rates for a particular coastline could be much greater than mean rates.
 
This is the danger of ignorance and in this case arrogant ignorance to humanity. I mean people living on a small island that refuse to believe a rising sea in front of their own eyes. Good lord this is such a rejection of reality it is hard to fathom. Make no mistake, human beings can be made to believe anything. If you said the words cognitive dissonance not a single one of them would know or care what it means.

This is like people sitting on the deck of the Titanic as the water rises to their feet and they're still sure the ship isn't sinking.
Yeah, ignorance. That's it!

There are plenty of rich muckity-mucks here in Murica, with lots and lots of extremely valuable seaside property. When they start selling for pennies on the dollar, you make sure to come warn us. Until such a time comes, you and the rest of your scaremongering moonbat brethren are the ignorant ones.

Again when people reject reality that is visible to anyone with sight it doesn't have anything to do with 'not having enough facts'. It has to do with abject fear of reality and dealing with it. You've checked the box you subscribe to.
Is the sea rising in the Chesapeake, or is the Chesapeake Bay doing what it is known to do? USGS says it's the latter.

Learn a bit about the Chesapeake Bay...not just you...the OP is ignorant about it, too.
Already posted the scientific information on the bay. The land there is subsiding. And the sea level is rising. The people there are getting hit with a double whammy. And most refuse even to consider that.
 



This is the danger of ignorance and in this case arrogant ignorance to humanity. I mean people living on a small island that refuse to believe a rising sea in front of their own eyes. Good lord this is such a rejection of reality it is hard to fathom. Make no mistake, human beings can be made to believe anything. If you said the words cognitive dissonance not a single one of them would know or care what it means.

This is like people sitting on the deck of the Titanic as the water rises to their feet and they're still sure the ship isn't sinking.

Yeah, because if the water is rising on the sides of your ship, that means the entire planet is sinking into ocean.

You are an idiot. You know that, don't you?


You believe an island is floating on water like a ship? Ok then Copernicus, sounds like you have all your planets aligned to Kolob. Good work and I like your tin-foil hat. Very stylish.


Is sea level changing on the shores of Chesapeake Bay right nearby? Er . . . . no, it isn't. But you, the rocket scientist, concludes it is because you live on an Island that's eroding away.

Fucking dumb shit. Don't you ever even research anything before you post your idiocy?

USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities Science Summary - Sea-Level Rise and Chesapeake Bay

Modern Sea-Level Rise

Two major factors contribute to global sea-level rise: thermal expansion from increasing ocean heat content, and the melting of glaciers and the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Since about 2003, glaciers and ice sheets (fig. 2) have contributed a greater proportion of the global sea-level rise than thermal expansion (Meier and others, 2007; Cogley, 2009; Rignot, Bamber, and others, 2008; Rignot, Box, and others, 2008). Today’s glaciers and ice sheets store enough water to raise sea level by about 68 to 70 m. Calculated rates of global mean sea-level rise range from 1.7 to 3.2 mm/yr, depending on the time period examined (Cazenave and Llovel, 2010; Church and White, 2011). Detecting fluctuations in the rate of sea-level change can be difficult as a result of the short period of record of tide gages and chronological uncertainty in marsh paleo-sea-level studies (Larsen and Clark, 2006). Some key findingsinclude:

  • Chesapeake Bay tide-gage records and paleo-sea-level records from tidal marshes and the bay’s main stem, determined from sediment cores collected from 1995 to 2006 (fig. 1), show that rates of sea-level rise in Chesapeake Bay range from about 3.2 to 4.7 mm/yr depending on the location and period of record for each tide gage. These rates exceed the global average because the land is subsiding; therefore, the Chesapeake Bay area is more vulnerable than many other coastal regions to sea-level rise.
  • The departure of sea-level trends in Chesapeake Bay from the global mean for the last century may not persist. Therefore, rates measured at tide gages do not necessarily reflect pre-20th century regional patterns, nor can they be expected to persist into the future.
  • Estimates of local subsidence from groundwater withdrawal in parts of Virginia are 1.5 and 3.7 mm/yr for 1979–95 and 1982–95, respectively (Pope and Burbey, 2004). Subsidence is expected to increase with greater withdrawals.
Projecting Future Sea-Level Rise

Projecting future sea-level rise is one of the most challenging aspects of the study of climate change. Although uncertainty remains great, empirical and modeling methods used in recent studies have provided new estimates of the cumulative rise in sea level by 2100 (Rahmstorf, 2007, 2010; Vermeer and Rahmstorf, 2009; Pfeffer and others, 2008; Bahr and others, 2009; Rignot and others, 2011). Some key findings include:

  • Evidence indicates a total rise of about 80 to 130 centimeters (cm), which is equivalent to annual rates of about 9 to 14 mm/yr, during the 21st century. Grinsted and others (2010) showed that sea-level rise could reach rates as high as 11 mm/yr by 2050. These values are estimated mean global rates and do not exclude the possibilities that slower or faster rates may persist for years to decades, that sea level may fall at times, or that regional rates for a particular coastline could be much greater than mean rates.

I love it when you contradict yourself with your own posts. :lol:
 
This is the danger of ignorance and in this case arrogant ignorance to humanity. I mean people living on a small island that refuse to believe a rising sea in front of their own eyes. Good lord this is such a rejection of reality it is hard to fathom. Make no mistake, human beings can be made to believe anything. If you said the words cognitive dissonance not a single one of them would know or care what it means.

This is like people sitting on the deck of the Titanic as the water rises to their feet and they're still sure the ship isn't sinking.
Yeah, ignorance. That's it!

There are plenty of rich muckity-mucks here in Murica, with lots and lots of extremely valuable seaside property. When they start selling for pennies on the dollar, you make sure to come warn us. Until such a time comes, you and the rest of your scaremongering moonbat brethren are the ignorant ones.

Again when people reject reality that is visible to anyone with sight it doesn't have anything to do with 'not having enough facts'. It has to do with abject fear of reality and dealing with it. You've checked the box you subscribe to.
Is the sea rising in the Chesapeake, or is the Chesapeake Bay doing what it is known to do? USGS says it's the latter.

Learn a bit about the Chesapeake Bay...not just you...the OP is ignorant about it, too.
OK, Si, are you a scientist, or are you a posier? If you claim to be a scientist, then why did you not link to a USGS site addressing the problems at the bay?
 
Just
This is the danger of ignorance and in this case arrogant ignorance to humanity. I mean people living on a small island that refuse to believe a rising sea in front of their own eyes. Good lord this is such a rejection of reality it is hard to fathom. Make no mistake, human beings can be made to believe anything. If you said the words cognitive dissonance not a single one of them would know or care what it means.

This is like people sitting on the deck of the Titanic as the water rises to their feet and they're still sure the ship isn't sinking.
Yeah, because if the water is rising on the sides of your ship, that means the entire planet is sinking into ocean.

You are an idiot. You know that, don't you?

You believe an island is floating on water like a ship? Ok then Copernicus, sounds like you have all your planets aligned to Kolob. Good work and I like your tin-foil hat. Very stylish.

Is sea level changing on the shores of Chesapeake Bay right nearby? Er . . . . no, it isn't. But you, the rocket scientist, concludes it is because you live on an Island that's eroding away.
Fucking dumb shit. Don't you ever even research anything before you post your idiocy?

USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities Science Summary - Sea-Level Rise and Chesapeake Bay

Modern Sea-Level Rise

Two major factors contribute to global sea-level rise: thermal expansion from increasing ocean heat content, and the melting of glaciers and the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Since about 2003, glaciers and ice sheets (fig. 2) have contributed a greater proportion of the global sea-level rise than thermal expansion (Meier and others, 2007; Cogley, 2009; Rignot, Bamber, and others, 2008; Rignot, Box, and others, 2008). Today’s glaciers and ice sheets store enough water to raise sea level by about 68 to 70 m. Calculated rates of global mean sea-level rise range from 1.7 to 3.2 mm/yr, depending on the time period examined (Cazenave and Llovel, 2010; Church and White, 2011). Detecting fluctuations in the rate of sea-level change can be difficult as a result of the short period of record of tide gages and chronological uncertainty in marsh paleo-sea-level studies (Larsen and Clark, 2006). Some key findingsinclude:

  • Chesapeake Bay tide-gage records and paleo-sea-level records from tidal marshes and the bay’s main stem, determined from sediment cores collected from 1995 to 2006 (fig. 1), show that rates of sea-level rise in Chesapeake Bay range from about 3.2 to 4.7 mm/yr depending on the location and period of record for each tide gage. These rates exceed the global average because the land is subsiding; therefore, the Chesapeake Bay area is more vulnerable than many other coastal regions to sea-level rise.
  • The departure of sea-level trends in Chesapeake Bay from the global mean for the last century may not persist. Therefore, rates measured at tide gages do not necessarily reflect pre-20th century regional patterns, nor can they be expected to persist into the future.
  • Estimates of local subsidence from groundwater withdrawal in parts of Virginia are 1.5 and 3.7 mm/yr for 1979–95 and 1982–95, respectively (Pope and Burbey, 2004). Subsidence is expected to increase with greater withdrawals.
Projecting Future Sea-Level Rise

Projecting future sea-level rise is one of the most challenging aspects of the study of climate change. Although uncertainty remains great, empirical and modeling methods used in recent studies have provided new estimates of the cumulative rise in sea level by 2100 (Rahmstorf, 2007, 2010; Vermeer and Rahmstorf, 2009; Pfeffer and others, 2008; Bahr and others, 2009; Rignot and others, 2011). Some key findings include:

  • Evidence indicates a total rise of about 80 to 130 centimeters (cm), which is equivalent to annual rates of about 9 to 14 mm/yr, during the 21st century. Grinsted and others (2010) showed that sea-level rise could reach rates as high as 11 mm/yr by 2050. These values are estimated mean global rates and do not exclude the possibilities that slower or faster rates may persist for years to decades, that sea level may fall at times, or that regional rates for a particular coastline could be much greater than mean rates.
I love it when you contradict yourself with your own posts. :lol:
Just how did I contradict myself? The bay is experiancing land subsidence and sea level rise at the same time. That is what that article says.
 
This is the danger of ignorance and in this case arrogant ignorance to humanity. I mean people living on a small island that refuse to believe a rising sea in front of their own eyes. Good lord this is such a rejection of reality it is hard to fathom. Make no mistake, human beings can be made to believe anything. If you said the words cognitive dissonance not a single one of them would know or care what it means.

This is like people sitting on the deck of the Titanic as the water rises to their feet and they're still sure the ship isn't sinking.
Yeah, ignorance. That's it!

There are plenty of rich muckity-mucks here in Murica, with lots and lots of extremely valuable seaside property. When they start selling for pennies on the dollar, you make sure to come warn us. Until such a time comes, you and the rest of your scaremongering moonbat brethren are the ignorant ones.

Again when people reject reality that is visible to anyone with sight it doesn't have anything to do with 'not having enough facts'. It has to do with abject fear of reality and dealing with it. You've checked the box you subscribe to.
Is the sea rising in the Chesapeake, or is the Chesapeake Bay doing what it is known to do? USGS says it's the latter.

Learn a bit about the Chesapeake Bay...not just you...the OP is ignorant about it, too.
OK, Si, are you a scientist, or are you a posier? If you claim to be a scientist, then why did you not link to a USGS site addressing the problems at the bay?
I've linked to it many times.

It says the majority of the issues in the Chesapeake's islands' disappearance are due to subsidence not sea level rise.

Islands come and go in the Chesapeake with frequency...have been since recorded history of the Chesapeake.
 
Last edited:
I see, you are claiming that that area is experiancing no rise in sea level? Your source for that claim?
Wrong.

Here's what I wrote. Let's see if you can resolve your apparent confusion (that's me being generous, rather than calling you dishonest).

"It says the majority of the issues in the Chesapeake's islands' disappearance are due to subsidence not sea level rise."
 
I see, you are claiming that that area is experiancing no rise in sea level? Your source for that claim?
Wrong.

Here's what I wrote. Let's see if you can resolve your apparent confusion (that's me being generous, rather than calling you dishonest).

"It says the majority of the issues in the Chesapeake's islands' disappearance are due to subsidence not sea level rise."
Wrong, simply wrong. Do some research before posting nonsense.

USGS- The Chesapeake Bay Region Is Sinking While The Sea Rises - Dan's Wild Wild Science Journal

Superimposing this sea level rise estimate over 0.16 m of subsidence
yields a total predicted Rel. Sea Level rise of 0.49–0.98 m for the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge by AD 2100. These are minimum estimates; several lines of evidence suggest that sea levels will rise more quickly in the Chesapeake Bay region. Recent tide gauge analyses indicate the acceleration of sea-level rise in the North Atlantic in recent decades, possibly due to dynamic ocean circulation processes (Yin et al., 2010; Boon, 2012; Ezer and Corlett, 2012; Sallenger et al., 2012). If this acceleration continues, it could induce an additional rise of 15 cm for the Chesapeake Bay and Washington D.C. areas by AD 2100 (Yin et Figure 5.

Sea level rise around Chesepeake Bay is 3.4 mm to 4.2 mm per year. Subsidence is 1.6 mm per year.
 
Hmmmmmm............................ So you are stating that your opinion is worth more than the work of the USGS. LOL What we expect from a silly denier.
 
Hmmmmmm............................ So you are stating that your opinion is worth more than the work of the USGS. LOL What we expect from a silly denier.
Not at all. I simply understand what I read. You post another's "opinion". That's why I laugh so often at you.

It is tragic, though...how much you soil science. But, you and others won't change. Your politics are more imporant than scientific integrity. Mine aren't.
 

Forum List

Back
Top