Almost 140 serious injuries to Capitol Cops

[DrLove]

He was known to have a knife, and he was going into his car where he could have had said knife.

Please show me where the woman was ever seen to be armed.

"Could have" is the standard for one person, "seen to be" is the standard for another.

Hmm, what could be the reason for such a double standard?

And they think they are winning this debate.

This is more fun now that the potus isn’t talking like them. Thank god we took our country back from the crazies who can’t see their hypocrisy and blatant double standards.

You two need a room, for some light petting, maybe a mutual hand job?

LOL

You're fantasizing about gay sex now, Marty??

Yet again, you reveal more about yourself than I'm certain you intended.

Stop trying to be Freudian, you can barely be Fred Flinstonian.

LOL

I can only go by what you reveal about yourself.

You’re Tom cruz and he’s Jack Nicholson in a few good men. Was Tom that good or was jacks character a hot head conservative idiot?

Keep in mind republicans rooted for jacks character not toms

Jack Nicholson???



He's more like Divine.

Actually, yes I can see a comparison between Jack's character and Trump's. Jack thought he could break the law and throw those two good men under the bus when he himself ordered the code red.

Maybe we will get this moment in upcoming court battles. "Mr Trump, did you order the insurrection?" "You're god damn right I ordered insurrection.

Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Sicknick, and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that Sicknick's death, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives.

​

You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall -- you need me on that wall. We use words like "honor," "code," "loyalty." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line.

​

I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand the post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think you're entitled to!

Did you order the insurrection?

You're god damn right I did. Oops.

LOL

Speaking of thinking one is above the law, here's a funny video along those lines...

She's one of my absolutely FAVORITE Karens. This is all that bitch does. There are a dozen other videos of her showing up and causing the same type of chaos.

 

[DrLove]

You are a wanna-be dictator because you want control of information, and don't care how you get it.

You understand that people can go to whatever website they want to on the internet, right?

Like, Twitter and Facebook aren't the only websites.

Jesus, you're delusional.

It's about access and equality, you want to shove anyone who disagrees with you into the equivalent of the internets basement, all the while pointing to censored platforms as indication your view is the popular one, and ignoring said censoring.

Admit it, you wanna be commie cum bucket.

Marty - You're getting your ass kicked in this thread. Time to retreat and lick your wounds, for they are many

 

[colfax_m]

Twitter is on it's way to doing it, with you applauding along the way.

So now you’re opposing Twitter for something they haven’t done.

You’re losing the argument.

 

[DrLove]

Have a cookie, Trumpster. You guys are too emotional.

This is now the Party of Victimhood and Grievance. It's a sad thing to watch.

 

[martybegan]

You are a wanna-be dictator because you want control of information, and don't care how you get it.

You understand that people can go to whatever website they want to on the internet, right?

Like, Twitter and Facebook aren't the only websites.

Jesus, you're delusional.

It's about access and equality, you want to shove anyone who disagrees with you into the equivalent of the internets basement, all the while pointing to censored platforms as indication your view is the popular one, and ignoring said censoring.

Admit it, you wanna be commie cum bucket.

Marty - You're getting your ass kicked in this thread. Time to retreat and lick your wounds, for they are many

Nope, if you are saying I am losing, then I am winning.

 

[Mac1958]

Have a cookie, Trumpster. You guys are too emotional.

This is now the Party of Victimhood and Grievance. It's a sad thing to watch.

It's just a non-stop reflection of the damaged, malignant narcissist they adore.

 

[martybegan]

Twitter is on it's way to doing it, with you applauding along the way.

So now you’re opposing Twitter for something they haven’t done.

You’re losing the argument.

Twitter is doing it, and day by day expanding their definition of "extremism" and "hate speech", always having more and more people on the right meeting the category, to the applause of Stasi wanna bees like you.

 

[Lesh]

You fuckers keep trying to use the summer unrest as an excuse for what you did at the Capitol.

It's a childish argument. You want to call me a hypocrite? Fine. You're wrong.

But that has NOTHING to do with what you MAGArats did when you attacked the Capitol.

No, I'm right. you guys went apeshit over one day of a protest that got out of hand and ignored months of long term destruction of property and assaults on police officers.

Again. Save the childish "you did it first" garbage

That assumes that had the summer unrest not occurred, that the Capitol attack would not have occurred. There is ZERO evidence to support that

 

[martybegan]

You fuckers keep trying to use the summer unrest as an excuse for what you did at the Capitol.

It's a childish argument. You want to call me a hypocrite? Fine. You're wrong.

But that has NOTHING to do with what you MAGArats did when you attacked the Capitol.

No, I'm right. you guys went apeshit over one day of a protest that got out of hand and ignored months of long term destruction of property and assaults on police officers.

Again. Save the childish "you did it first" garbage

That assumes that had the summer unrest not occurred, that the Capitol attack would not have occurred. There is ZERO evidence to support that

That's not the argument, the argument is you only care because you can use it to bash your opponents, the other argument is that you are exaggerating it for the reason in argument #1, and the final argument is that you are a melon head.

 

[Lesh]

He was known to have a knife, and he was going into his car where he could have had said knife.

Please show me where the woman was ever seen to be armed.

"Could have" is the standard for one person, "seen to be" is the standard for another.

Hmm, what could be the reason for such a double standard?

And they think they are winning this debate.

This is more fun now that the potus isn’t talking like them. Thank god we took our country back from the crazies who can’t see their hypocrisy and blatant double standards.

You two need a room, for some light petting, maybe a mutual hand job?

LOL

You're fantasizing about gay sex now, Marty??

Yet again, you reveal more about yourself than I'm certain you intended.

Stop trying to be Freudian, you can barely be Fred Flinstonian.

LOL

I can only go by what you reveal about yourself.

You’re Tom cruz and he’s Jack Nicholson in a few good men. Was Tom that good or was jacks character a hot head conservative idiot?

Keep in mind republicans rooted for jacks character not toms

Jack Nicholson???



He's more like Divine.

Actually, yes I can see a comparison between Jack's character and Trump's. Jack thought he could break the law and throw those two good men under the bus when he himself ordered the code red.

Maybe we will get this moment in upcoming court battles. "Mr Trump, did you order the insurrection?" "You're god damn right I ordered insurrection.

Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Sicknick, and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that Sicknick's death, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives.

​

You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall -- you need me on that wall. We use words like "honor," "code," "loyalty." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line.

​

I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand the post. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think you're entitled to!

Did you order the insurrection?

You're god damn right I did. Oops.

LOL

Speaking of thinking one is above the law, here's a funny video along those lines...

She's one of my absolutely FAVORITE Karens. This is all that bitch does. There are a dozen other videos of her showing up and causing the same type of chaos.

Had she been black she would have been on her belly with a knee on her neck

 

[colfax_m]

Twitter is on it's way to doing it, with you applauding along the way.

So now you’re opposing Twitter for something they haven’t done.

You’re losing the argument.

Twitter is doing it, and day by day expanding their definition of "extremism" and "hate speech", always having more and more people on the right meeting the category, to the applause of Stasi wanna bees like you.

And you call me absurd. You’re comparing being kicked off Twitter to being subject to secret police.

It’s stupid and you know it. You aren’t even complaining of something that they’re actually doing, just something that you think they’re going to do. In other words, you created persecution in your head and now want the government to fix it.

Fuck your feelings.

 

[Lesh]

You fuckers keep trying to use the summer unrest as an excuse for what you did at the Capitol.

It's a childish argument. You want to call me a hypocrite? Fine. You're wrong.

But that has NOTHING to do with what you MAGArats did when you attacked the Capitol.

That's not the argument, the argument is you only care because you can use it to bash your opponents, the other argument is that you are exaggerating it for the reason in argument #1, and the final argument is that you are a melon head.

Again

 

[martybegan]

Twitter is on it's way to doing it, with you applauding along the way.

So now you’re opposing Twitter for something they haven’t done.

You’re losing the argument.

Twitter is doing it, and day by day expanding their definition of "extremism" and "hate speech", always having more and more people on the right meeting the category, to the applause of Stasi wanna bees like you.

And you call me absurd. You’re comparing being kicked off Twitter to being subject to secret police.

It’s stupid and you know it. You aren’t even complaining of something that they’re actually doing, just something that you think they’re going to do. In other words, you created persecution in your head and now want the government to fix it.

Fuck your feelings.

It's denial of equal access to the current commons of political discourse. It's a concerted effort to make one viewpoint the only viewpoint, and you cheer it on like an ignorant fucktard.

 

[martybegan]

You fuckers keep trying to use the summer unrest as an excuse for what you did at the Capitol.

It's a childish argument. You want to call me a hypocrite? Fine. You're wrong.

But that has NOTHING to do with what you MAGArats did when you attacked the Capitol.

That's not the argument, the argument is you only care because you can use it to bash your opponents, the other argument is that you are exaggerating it for the reason in argument #1, and the final argument is that you are a melon head.

Again

Again what, you pee while sitting soi boi cuck?

 

[colfax_m]

Twitter is on it's way to doing it, with you applauding along the way.

So now you’re opposing Twitter for something they haven’t done.

You’re losing the argument.

Twitter is doing it, and day by day expanding their definition of "extremism" and "hate speech", always having more and more people on the right meeting the category, to the applause of Stasi wanna bees like you.

And you call me absurd. You’re comparing being kicked off Twitter to being subject to secret police.

It’s stupid and you know it. You aren’t even complaining of something that they’re actually doing, just something that you think they’re going to do. In other words, you created persecution in your head and now want the government to fix it.

Fuck your feelings.

It's denial of equal access to the current commons of political discourse. It's a concerted effort to make one viewpoint the only viewpoint, and you cheer it on like an ignorant fucktard.

They aren’t commons. You want to engage in speech, do it yourself. If people don’t want to help you do it, maybe that’s because you’re an asshole.

And that’s not my problem.

 

[martybegan]

Twitter is on it's way to doing it, with you applauding along the way.

So now you’re opposing Twitter for something they haven’t done.

You’re losing the argument.

Twitter is doing it, and day by day expanding their definition of "extremism" and "hate speech", always having more and more people on the right meeting the category, to the applause of Stasi wanna bees like you.

And you call me absurd. You’re comparing being kicked off Twitter to being subject to secret police.

It’s stupid and you know it. You aren’t even complaining of something that they’re actually doing, just something that you think they’re going to do. In other words, you created persecution in your head and now want the government to fix it.

Fuck your feelings.

It's denial of equal access to the current commons of political discourse. It's a concerted effort to make one viewpoint the only viewpoint, and you cheer it on like an ignorant fucktard.

They aren’t commons. You want to engage in speech, do it yourself. If people don’t want to help you do it, maybe that’s because you’re an asshole.

And that’s not my problem.

They should be. Right now they are controlled by one side of the political spectrum, and you are only OK with it because it's your side doing the controlling.

Your problem is you are a fascist wanna be hack-twat.

 

[Lesh]

You fuckers keep trying to use the summer unrest as an excuse for what you did at the Capitol.

It's a childish argument. You want to call me a hypocrite? Fine. You're wrong.

But that has NOTHING to do with what you MAGArats did when you attacked the Capitol.

That's not the argument, the argument is you only care because you can use it to bash your opponents, the other argument is that you are exaggerating it for the reason in argument #1, and the final argument is that you are a melon head.

Again

Again what, you pee while sitting soi boi cuck?

Surrender accepted

 

[Lesh]

They should be.

Twitter should be controlled by the government?

Who's the "socialist" now...

 

[martybegan]

You fuckers keep trying to use the summer unrest as an excuse for what you did at the Capitol.

It's a childish argument. You want to call me a hypocrite? Fine. You're wrong.

But that has NOTHING to do with what you MAGArats did when you attacked the Capitol.

That's not the argument, the argument is you only care because you can use it to bash your opponents, the other argument is that you are exaggerating it for the reason in argument #1, and the final argument is that you are a melon head.

Again

Again what, you pee while sitting soi boi cuck?

Surrender accepted

Nope, nice try. I don't go away you limp wristed beta twat.

 

[martybegan]

They should be.

Twitter should be controlled by the government?

Who's the "socialist" now...

Regulated to adhere to political viewpoint content neutral moderation. They keep their money, they keep their property, they keep everything.