All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is a bit different - countries like UAE, Bahrain and Oman
don't have a history of violence and expulsion of the Jewish community.

They took care of that demographic issue in the Dark ages, forced conversions and deportations. It's like claiming they never had black slave problems, they just don't ever talk about the 12th Century massacres of all black slaves during a revolt, and after that the full frontal castrations of black male slaves imported in and the routine murders of black slaves when they were no longer useful. Two thirds to 3 quarters of the population were Jewish and Christian in Medina alone at the time Mo stated his looney bandit cult, which is why they plagarized Moses and 'revised' the OT books.
 
This is a bit different - countries like UAE, Bahrain and Oman
don't have a history of violence and expulsion of the Jewish community.

They took care of that demographic issue in the Dark ages, forced conversions and deportations. It's like claiming they never had black slave problems, they just don't ever talk about the 12th Century massacres of all black slaves during a revolt, and after that the full frontal castrations of black male slaves imported in and the routine murders of black slaves when they were no longer useful. Two thirds to 3 quarters of the population were Jewish and Christian in Medina alone at the time Mo stated his looney bandit cult, which is why they plagarized Moses and 'revised' the OT books.

Nonsense.
Mohammad when to Medina because he sought the protection of Jewish tribes there.
Moslems never forced conversion or deported Jews or Christians.
The Quran is clear that all 3 monotheistic, Abrahamic religions, were brothers of the book, meaning the Old Testament.
Jews were the first allies that Moslems had, and there was never any conflict until European Jews started stealing land in Palestine, around 1930 or so.
 
Nonsense.
Mohammad when to Medina because he sought the protection of Jewish tribes there.
Moslems never forced conversion or deported Jews or Christians.
The Quran is clear that all 3 monotheistic, Abrahamic religions, were brothers of the book, meaning the Old Testament.
Jews were the first allies that Moslems had, and there was never any conflict until European Jews started stealing land in Palestine, around 1930 or so.

Rubbish. they massacred and forced conversions everywhere they went, from Spain to India. The Ethiopian Christians also hid him out once, but no gratitude was ever shown them by Mo or Muslims. They leave enough alive to pay them protection and move on. Forced conversions are why you see so many Arab names in regions like Persia, where many today mistake the names of scholars for Arabs when they were actually converted Persians, Zorastrians, Christians, and Jews, Arabs being largely illiterates. Arab peasants didn't like them any more than European peasants did, so riots and purges were common, more common than in Europe.

'European Jews' never 'stole' land in Palestine, they paid high prices for it, and it was being sold to them by the rich Arab families, who then hoped to steal it back later by force. The Ottomans brought them in, in several aliyahs, the first starting in 1869, to repopulate the region after a civil war with Egypt, and nothing but deadbeats were left in the region who didn't pay taxes, just like the Arab deadbeats and squatters now pretending to be 'refugees', most of whom moved there for the jobs being created by Jews and Brits starting up orchards and other businesses, same as illegals do in the U.S. Now the U.S. has similar problems and has a lot of foreign racists and thugs swinging elections now, while Israelis aren't stupid enough yet to let swarms of asshole deadbeats in so far, like the GOP and Democrats have here, just because rich people like cheap maids and gardeners they can abuse for fun.
 
Last edited:
Nonsense.
Mohammad when to Medina because he sought the protection of Jewish tribes there.
Moslems never forced conversion or deported Jews or Christians.
The Quran is clear that all 3 monotheistic, Abrahamic religions, were brothers of the book, meaning the Old Testament.
Jews were the first allies that Moslems had, and there was never any conflict until European Jews started stealing land in Palestine, around 1930 or so.

Rubbish. they massacred and forced conversions everywhere they went, from Spain to India. The Ethiopian Christians also hid him out once, but no gratitude was ever shown them by Mo or Muslims. They leave enough alive to pay them protection and move on. Forced conversions are why you see so many Arab names in regions like Persia, where many today mistake the names of scholars for Arabs when they were actually converted Persians, Zorastrians, Christians, and Jews, Arabs being largely illiterates. Arab peasants didn't like them any more than European peasants did, so riots and purges were common, more common than in Europe.

'European Jews' never 'stole' land in Palestine, they paid high prices for it, and it was being sold to them by the rich Arab families, who then hoped to steal it back later by force. The Ottomans brought them in, in several aliyahs, the first starting in 1869, to repopulate the region after a civil war with Egypt, and nothing but deadbeats were left in the region who didn't pay taxes, just like the Arab deadbeats and squatters now pretending to be 'refugees', most of whom moved there for the jobs being created by Jews and Brits starting up orchards and other businesses, same as illegals do in the U.S. Now the U.S. has similar problems and has a lot of foreign racists and thugs swinging elections now, while Israelis aren't stupid enough yet to let swarms of asshole deadbeats in so far, like the GOP and Democrats have here, just because rich people like cheap maids and gardeners they can abuse for fun.

Totally wrong, made up propaganda and lies.
The Quran not only is very clear in saying that all 3 monotheistic Abrahamic religions are valid, but there can NEVER be any coercion over religion. Muslims NEVER forced conversion or harmed any other religion.
That is obvious because Jews were harmed by the Christian Crusaders and Christian Inquisitions, and went to Muslims for help and protection. The Moors in the Iberian Peninsular gave all rule and administration to Jewish Viziers.
As for Muslim aggression, that is also a lie.
Islam only lasted for about 600 years before being defeated and its leadership wiped out by the invading Mongols, around 1200. They were followed by the Moguls, Mameluks, Moors, and Turks, who were not even particularly religious, much less Islamic fanatics.
And the claim Jews or Christians are forced to "pay protection" is also a lie.
The jizya is not more than Moslem pay in the Mosque for social welfare programs, and the jizya is just making sure those who do not go to the Mosque pay an equal fair share.

And Israel is totally illegitimate.
The Hebrew hordes are not even from Palestine at all, and did not invade until around 1000 BC, and only held on to rule for a few hundred years, until repeatedly defeated by locals like the Assyrians and Babylonians, and forced to leave. The Romans brought them back, but then realized how arrogant they were, and forced them to finally leave for good around 160 AD.
Almost all the current Jews in Israel are recent illegal immigrants or descendants of recent illegal immigrants, and almost none paid for any of the land they stole.
Look at the census data, and you will find that before 1920, Jews were less than 5% of the population of Palestine.

And by the way, calling Moslems "illiterate" is an obvious lie, since all Muslims are required to learn how to read the Quran.
 
This is a bit different - countries like UAE, Bahrain and Oman
don't have a history of violence and expulsion of the Jewish community.

They took care of that demographic issue in the Dark ages, forced conversions and deportations. It's like claiming they never had black slave problems, they just don't ever talk about the 12th Century massacres of all black slaves during a revolt, and after that the full frontal castrations of black male slaves imported in and the routine murders of black slaves when they were no longer useful. Two thirds to 3 quarters of the population were Jewish and Christian in Medina alone at the time Mo stated his looney bandit cult, which is why they plagarized Moses and 'revised' the OT books.

Nonsense.
Mohammad when to Medina because he sought the protection of Jewish tribes there.
Moslems never forced conversion or deported Jews or Christians.
The Quran is clear that all 3 monotheistic, Abrahamic religions, were brothers of the book, meaning the Old Testament.
Jews were the first allies that Moslems had, and there was never any conflict until European Jews started stealing land in Palestine, around 1930 or so.

Not that you have to censor half of the Quran for that bs to fly,
is that what Muslims call "protection"?

cb7ntrwki6141.jpg

The Book of Jihad and Expiditions - Chapter 21 -
Expulsion of Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula | SUNNAH.COM
 
Last edited:
This is a bit different - countries like UAE, Bahrain and Oman
don't have a history of violence and expulsion of the Jewish community.

They took care of that demographic issue in the Dark ages, forced conversions and deportations. It's like claiming they never had black slave problems, they just don't ever talk about the 12th Century massacres of all black slaves during a revolt, and after that the full frontal castrations of black male slaves imported in and the routine murders of black slaves when they were no longer useful. Two thirds to 3 quarters of the population were Jewish and Christian in Medina alone at the time Mo stated his looney bandit cult, which is why they plagarized Moses and 'revised' the OT books.

Nonsense.
Mohammad when to Medina because he sought the protection of Jewish tribes there.
Moslems never forced conversion or deported Jews or Christians.
The Quran is clear that all 3 monotheistic, Abrahamic religions, were brothers of the book, meaning the Old Testament.
Jews were the first allies that Moslems had, and there was never any conflict until European Jews started stealing land in Palestine, around 1930 or so.

Not that you have to censor half of the Quran for that bs to fly,
is that what Muslims call "protection"?

cb7ntrwki6141.jpg

The Book of Jihad and Expiditions - Chapter 21 -
Expulsion of Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula | SUNNAH.COM


Wrong.
{...

Omar ((/ˈoʊmɑːr/), also spelled Umar /ˈuːmɑːr/; Arabic: عمر بن الخطاب‎ ʻUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb [ˈʕomɑr-, ˈʕʊmɑr ɪbn alxɑtˤˈtˤɑːb], "Umar, Son of Al-Khattab"; c. 584 CE – 3 November 644 CE), was one of the most powerful and influential Muslim caliphs in history.[8] He was a senior companion of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. He succeeded Abu Bakr (632–634) as the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate on 23 August 634. He was an expert Muslim jurist known for his pious and just nature, which earned him the epithet Al-Farooq ("the one who distinguishes (between right and wrong)"). He is sometimes referred to as Omar I by historians of early Islam, since a later Umayyad caliph, Umar II, also bore that name.

Under Omar, the caliphate expanded at an unprecedented rate, ruling the Sasanian Empire and more than two-thirds of the Byzantine Empire.[9] His attacks against the Sasanian Empire resulted in the conquest of Persia in less than two years (642–644). According to Jewish tradition, Omar set aside the Christian ban on Jews and allowed them into Jerusalem and to worship.[10] Omar was eventually killed by the Persian Piruz Nahavandi (known as ’Abū Lu’lu’ah in Arabic) in 644 CE.

Omar is revered in the Sunni tradition as a great ruler and paragon of Islamic virtues,[11] and some hadiths identify him as the second greatest of the Sahabah after Abu Bakr.[12][13] He is viewed negatively in the Shia tradition.[14]

...}
 
RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ et al,

BLUF: The conflicts, in the Near East (North Africa and the Middle East)(MENA) Regions, are NOT about religion. Religion is a primary tool of exploitation that amplifies differences and ferments distrust; but, it is NOT the reason for or motive behind the conflict(s). In fact, religion can be used to foster peace and promote human development.

(COMMENT)

I do not have to know anything about any of the practicing or influential religions of the greater MENA Region. Religion has elements of inclusivity – as well as – exclusivity – used and manipulated by prominent state actors and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), – to mount convincing arguments and supporting positions in any political direction. We see one of the greatest examples of manipulation by the United Nations and the subsidiary activities.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ et al,

BLUF: The conflicts, in the Near East (North Africa and the Middle East)(MENA) Regions, are NOT about religion. Religion is a primary tool of exploitation that amplifies differences and ferments distrust; but, it is NOT the reason for or motive behind the conflict(s). In fact, religion can be used to foster peace and promote human development.

(COMMENT)

I do not have to know anything about any of the practicing or influential religions of the greater MENA Region. Religion has elements of inclusivity – as well as – exclusivity – used and manipulated by prominent state actors and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), – to mount convincing arguments and supporting positions in any political direction. We see one of the greatest examples of manipulation by the United Nations and the subsidiary activities.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R


I agree that the conflicts are not really over religion.
Both Judaism and Islam are montheistic, Abrahamic religions using the same Old Testament.

The conflict is over European Zionist immigrants attempting to take land without paying for it, and attempting to destroy indigenous cultures and populations.
 
The conflict is over European Zionist immigrants attempting to take land without paying for it

Who are they trying to take it from?

The Arabs who have traditionally owned the land for 8,000 years, like the Chaldeans, Amorites, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Urites, Nabateans, etc.
The Hebrew invaders had no presence there until the 1000 BC invasion, and they were quickly kicked back out by Assyrians, Babylonians, Romans, etc.
 
The conflict is over European Zionist immigrants attempting to take land without paying for it

Who are they trying to take it from?

The Arabs who have traditionally owned the land for 8,000 years, like the Chaldeans, Amorites, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Urites, Nabateans, etc.
The Hebrew invaders had no presence there until the 1000 BC invasion, and they were quickly kicked back out by Assyrians, Babylonians, Romans, etc.

The Arabs who have traditionally owned the land for 8,000 years,

Arabs? Why aren't they all in Saudi Arabia?
Is it because they were invading and stealing?
 
This is a bit different - countries like UAE, Bahrain and Oman
don't have a history of violence and expulsion of the Jewish community.

They took care of that demographic issue in the Dark ages, forced conversions and deportations. It's like claiming they never had black slave problems, they just don't ever talk about the 12th Century massacres of all black slaves during a revolt, and after that the full frontal castrations of black male slaves imported in and the routine murders of black slaves when they were no longer useful. Two thirds to 3 quarters of the population were Jewish and Christian in Medina alone at the time Mo stated his looney bandit cult, which is why they plagarized Moses and 'revised' the OT books.

Nonsense.
Mohammad when to Medina because he sought the protection of Jewish tribes there.
Moslems never forced conversion or deported Jews or Christians.
The Quran is clear that all 3 monotheistic, Abrahamic religions, were brothers of the book, meaning the Old Testament.
Jews were the first allies that Moslems had, and there was never any conflict until European Jews started stealing land in Palestine, around 1930 or so.

Not that you have to censor half of the Quran for that bs to fly,
is that what Muslims call "protection"?

cb7ntrwki6141.jpg

The Book of Jihad and Expiditions - Chapter 21 -
Expulsion of Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula | SUNNAH.COM


Wrong.
{...

Omar ((/ˈoʊmɑːr/), also spelled Umar /ˈuːmɑːr/; Arabic: عمر بن الخطاب‎ ʻUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb [ˈʕomɑr-, ˈʕʊmɑr ɪbn alxɑtˤˈtˤɑːb], "Umar, Son of Al-Khattab"; c. 584 CE – 3 November 644 CE), was one of the most powerful and influential Muslim caliphs in history.[8] He was a senior companion of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. He succeeded Abu Bakr (632–634) as the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate on 23 August 634. He was an expert Muslim jurist known for his pious and just nature, which earned him the epithet Al-Farooq ("the one who distinguishes (between right and wrong)"). He is sometimes referred to as Omar I by historians of early Islam, since a later Umayyad caliph, Umar II, also bore that name.

Under Omar, the caliphate expanded at an unprecedented rate, ruling the Sasanian Empire and more than two-thirds of the Byzantine Empire.[9] His attacks against the Sasanian Empire resulted in the conquest of Persia in less than two years (642–644). According to Jewish tradition, Omar set aside the Christian ban on Jews and allowed them into Jerusalem and to worship.[10] Omar was eventually killed by the Persian Piruz Nahavandi (known as ’Abū Lu’lu’ah in Arabic) in 644 CE.

Omar is revered in the Sunni tradition as a great ruler and paragon of Islamic virtues,[11] and some hadiths identify him as the second greatest of the Sahabah after Abu Bakr.[12][13] He is viewed negatively in the Shia tradition.[14]

...}

Priceless.

So your proof that "Moslems never forced conversion or deported anyone",
is the Caliph who himself expelled Jews and Christians from the Arabian peninsula?



There were three main Jewish tribes in Medina, forming the most important Hejazi community before the rise of Islam in Arabia. These were the Banu Nadir, the Banu Qainuqa and the Banu Qurayza. Banu Nadir, the Banu Qainuqa, and the Banu Qurayza lived in northern Arabia, at the oasis of Yathribu until the 7th century, when the men were sentenced to death and women and children enslaved after betraying the pact made with the Muslims[25] following the Invasion of Banu Qurayza by Muslim forces under Muhammad.[26][27]

"In year 20 of the Muslim era, or the year 641 AD, Muhammad's successor the Caliph Umar decreed that Jews and Christians should be removed from all but the southern and eastern fringes of Arabia—a decree based on the uttering of the Prophet: "Let there not be two religions in Arabia". "


 
Last edited:
Will the Egyptian people rise up whenever a picture of an Egyptian citizen appears with an Israeli in Dubai or Manama? Or is the sword of suspension and punishment only for the well-known people whose moral assassination is?

Is the rejection of normalization really in support of the Palestinian cause, or is it an absurd weapon aimed at satisfying Egyptian pride and easing our shortcomings?

Unfortunately, we are living like cavemen, prisoners of outdated beliefs and concepts that are not in line with the reality in which we live.

The reality says that the Jews are people whether they carry Israeli citizenship or not, just like other peoples, including the good and the bad, the polite and the impolite, the one who loves peace, and the one who rejects it. And that the personality characteristics of any Jew have no relationship to his nationality, whether Israeli or other.

The Egyptian illusion, on the other hand, insists on demonizing the Jews and exaggerates the importance and impact of the Egyptian rejection of normalization, although this is the last concern of the Israelis, especially after the breakthrough in relations with many Gulf states.

I hope that Egyptians will see how the Emirati people deal with maturity and reason with their cause of peace with Israel, and how their wise leadership left the freedom for individuals to deal with the Israelis or avoid them if they wanted.

The Egyptian people are not a herd of sheep who follow a guide.

The Egyptian people are made up of individuals, each of whom has the right to agree or disagree in his convictions, as long as it does not harm the interests of the nation.

(full article online)

 
An anti-Israel Canadian group, "Independent Jewish Voices," published a series of memes to "prove" that "Israel is a racist endeavor," in an attempt to disprove the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism which uses that phrase as an example of antisemitism.

Their examples are ridiculous, but instead of arguing and putting ourselves on the defensive, I decided to use their own rules as to what "proves" that Zionism is racism to prove that Palestinian nationalism, or Palestinianism, has been suffused with antisemitism since it began.

I very quickly found 16 examples, and I'm sure I can find hundreds more. But these should make the point.

Feel free to tweet these and use them liberally.

(full article online)

 
Ahmed originally came to the Israeli hospital with what appeared to be a tumor in his abdomen that was too large to remove, so he was prepared for chemotherapy. However, within a few days the child became very ill and it was found that the tumor was massively bleeding. In a series of complex operations, surgeons catheterized the many blood vessels that were connected to it while Ahmed was on a heart bypass.

Now his parents need to pay for the Ahmed's hospitalization - but the Palestinian Authority refuses to pay for any medical procedures that happen in Israel.

So the hospital set up an account for Israelis to help pay for Ahmad's medical expenses.

One would think that with all the supposed pride that Palestinians have, they would be embarrassed that Jews are paying for the medical expenses of a Palestinian. But honor is a weird thing - to Palestinian leaders, the bigger shame is to pay Israelis to help cure Palestinian kids.

It is a perverted culture.

One must wonder, though, how come none of the tens of millions of dollars that pour from European countries and NGOs to fund anti-Israel organizations can be used to help people like Ahmad Abu Halima.

(full article online)

 
RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Ahmed's Hospitalization - Palestinian Authority
⁜→ et al,

BLUF: Sometimes the obvious is not the reason. This is more of a comparison between the two cultures than it is on the value of life within the Arab Palestinian Culture.

Being pro-Palestinian seems to have little to do with actually caring about Palestinian lives.
...............................................................................................................................Elder of Ziyon

Screen Shot 2020-12-10 at 10.13.54 AM.png
Now his parents need to pay for the Ahmed's hospitalization - but the Palestinian Authority refuses to pay for any medical procedures that happen in Israel.

So the hospital set up an account for Israelis to help pay for Ahmad's medical expenses.

One would think that with all the supposed pride that Palestinians have, they would be embarrassed that Jews are paying for the medical expenses of a Palestinian. But honor is a weird thing - to Palestinian leaders, the bigger shame is to pay Israelis to help cure Palestinian kids.

It is a perverted culture.
(COMMENT)

Actually, I don't think the parents will have to pay for anything they cannot afford; the debt is actually owed by the Palestinian Authority. That is just how the Jewish Culture works. The obligation and payment on a debt is almost a law stemming from religious belief But by the same token, the Jewish culture does not really have a concept of legal persecution over a debt.

(AN OUTSIDE OBSERVER'S VIEW)

In the Jewish Culture, the Israelis assume some of the responsibility for the care they provided. It is a moral dilemma for them. Once they take the child into their care, they have a responsibility to provide the best care they can, without regard to payment.

Conversely, the Arab Palestinian
(while Muslim) does not feel an obligation to help those in need (the family) or those owed a debt (the Hospital and Staff) for care provided. The concern for life is not the same.

◈ The Arab Palestinian have no objection to using men, women, or children as cannon fodder or shields.
◈ The Arab Palestinian immortalize those that kill men, women, or children in the name of the Arab Palestinian cause.
The life of a child, in the Menu of Death, for the Arab Palestinian does not incur an obligation. They have a very cavalier, callous, and depraved disregard for life. That is their culture. They only raise the issue if the death is to their benefit.

SIGIL PAIR.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Ahmed's Hospitalization - Palestinian Authority
⁜→ et al,

BLUF: Sometimes the obvious is not the reason. This is more of a comparison between the two cultures than it is on the value of life within the Arab Palestinian Culture.

Being pro-Palestinian seems to have little to do with actually caring about Palestinian lives.
...............................................................................................................................Elder of Ziyon

View attachment 427367
Now his parents need to pay for the Ahmed's hospitalization - but the Palestinian Authority refuses to pay for any medical procedures that happen in Israel.

So the hospital set up an account for Israelis to help pay for Ahmad's medical expenses.

One would think that with all the supposed pride that Palestinians have, they would be embarrassed that Jews are paying for the medical expenses of a Palestinian. But honor is a weird thing - to Palestinian leaders, the bigger shame is to pay Israelis to help cure Palestinian kids.

It is a perverted culture.
(COMMENT)

Actually, I don't think the parents will have to pay for anything they cannot afford; the debt is actually owed by the Palestinian Authority. That is just how the Jewish Culture works. The obligation and payment on a debt is almost a law stemming from religious belief But by the same token, the Jewish culture does not really have a concept of legal persecution over a debt.

(AN OUTSIDE OBSERVER'S VIEW)

In the Jewish Culture, the Israelis assume some of the responsibility for the care they provided. It is a moral dilemma for them. Once they take the child into their care, they have a responsibility to provide the best care they can, without regard to payment.

Conversely, the Arab Palestinian
(while Muslim) does not feel an obligation to help those in need (the family) or those owed a debt (the Hospital and Staff) for care provided. The concern for life is not the same.

◈ The Arab Palestinian have no objection to using men, women, or children as cannon fodder or shields.
◈ The Arab Palestinian immortalize those that kill men, women, or children in the name of the Arab Palestinian cause.
The life of a child, in the Menu of Death, for the Arab Palestinian does not incur an obligation. They have a very cavalier, callous, and depraved disregard for life. That is their culture. They only raise the issue if the death is to their benefit.

SIGIL PAIR.png

Most Respectfully,
R
Israel does everything it can to close down charities and to throttle economic activity and trade. Everything they can to keep the Palestinians broke.

Girls at the Hebron Orphanage were terrified when the Israeli army broke into their home in the middle of the night and stole all the equipment from the dressmaking workshop

 
RE: All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Ahmed's Hospitalization - Palestinian Authority
⁜→ et al,

BLUF: Sometimes the obvious is not the reason. This is more of a comparison between the two cultures than it is on the value of life within the Arab Palestinian Culture.

Being pro-Palestinian seems to have little to do with actually caring about Palestinian lives.
...............................................................................................................................Elder of Ziyon

View attachment 427367
Now his parents need to pay for the Ahmed's hospitalization - but the Palestinian Authority refuses to pay for any medical procedures that happen in Israel.

So the hospital set up an account for Israelis to help pay for Ahmad's medical expenses.

One would think that with all the supposed pride that Palestinians have, they would be embarrassed that Jews are paying for the medical expenses of a Palestinian. But honor is a weird thing - to Palestinian leaders, the bigger shame is to pay Israelis to help cure Palestinian kids.

It is a perverted culture.
(COMMENT)

Actually, I don't think the parents will have to pay for anything they cannot afford; the debt is actually owed by the Palestinian Authority. That is just how the Jewish Culture works. The obligation and payment on a debt is almost a law stemming from religious belief But by the same token, the Jewish culture does not really have a concept of legal persecution over a debt.

(AN OUTSIDE OBSERVER'S VIEW)

In the Jewish Culture, the Israelis assume some of the responsibility for the care they provided. It is a moral dilemma for them. Once they take the child into their care, they have a responsibility to provide the best care they can, without regard to payment.

Conversely, the Arab Palestinian
(while Muslim) does not feel an obligation to help those in need (the family) or those owed a debt (the Hospital and Staff) for care provided. The concern for life is not the same.

◈ The Arab Palestinian have no objection to using men, women, or children as cannon fodder or shields.
◈ The Arab Palestinian immortalize those that kill men, women, or children in the name of the Arab Palestinian cause.
The life of a child, in the Menu of Death, for the Arab Palestinian does not incur an obligation. They have a very cavalier, callous, and depraved disregard for life. That is their culture. They only raise the issue if the death is to their benefit.

SIGIL PAIR.png

Most Respectfully,
R
Israel does everything it can to close down charities and to throttle economic activity and trade. Everything they can to keep the Palestinians broke.

Girls at the Hebron Orphanage were terrified when the Israeli army broke into their home in the middle of the night and stole all the equipment from the dressmaking workshop
looks like a manipulated piece of Pallywood propaganda.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top