All Of Paraguay’s Temperature Record Has Been Tampered With

IanC

Gold Member
Sep 22, 2009
11,061
1,344
245
a few days ago I posted up some temp stations from Paraquay to show that the hotspot in south america that is part of the 'hottest year evah' were in fact warmer only because of adjustments.

Paul Homewood has investigated all of the stations in Paraquay now, and they all follow the same pattern.

a few more examples -

pilar_thumb.gif
juan_thumb.gif
concepcion_thumb.gif



GISS and NOAA have yet to respond. what do you think is more likely? an open and transparent explanation of the 'correction'? or a disappearance of the past data? judging how past information and intermediate calculation steps have been vanishing over the last few years I am betting that even more stonewalling is about to occur.

hopefully some influential media outlets will give this story enough public exposure that this problem will have to be investigated.

All Of Paraguay rsquo s Temperature Record Has Been Tampered With NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
 
Really? No one gives a shit about the changes being arbitrarily enacted on temperature records? Dozens of pages discussing whether 0.01C is a new record but no one notices when a thermometer reading from 50 years ago has a few degrees lopped off?
 
a few days ago I posted up some temp stations from Paraquay to show that the hotspot in south america that is part of the 'hottest year evah' were in fact warmer only because of adjustments.

Paul Homewood has investigated all of the stations in Paraquay now, and they all follow the same pattern.

a few more examples -

pilar_thumb.gif
juan_thumb.gif
concepcion_thumb.gif



GISS and NOAA have yet to respond. what do you think is more likely? an open and transparent explanation of the 'correction'? or a disappearance of the past data? judging how past information and intermediate calculation steps have been vanishing over the last few years I am betting that even more stonewalling is about to occur.

hopefully some influential media outlets will give this story enough public exposure that this problem will have to be investigated.

All Of Paraguay rsquo s Temperature Record Has Been Tampered With NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT





Wow. How totally unsurprising. So far every data set that has been checked, has been falsified.
 
Obviously, NASA and NOAA need to jump every time some denier kook mangles the data.

If they don't, it's further proof of the conspiracy.

That's how it things work now in the denier conspiracy nutter kingdom.

Good luck with that, deniers. And good luck with howling at the moon on message boards. You can see how well that's working for you.
 
a few days ago I posted up some temp stations from Paraquay to show that the hotspot in south america that is part of the 'hottest year evah' were in fact warmer only because of adjustments.

Paul Homewood has investigated all of the stations in Paraquay now, and they all follow the same pattern.

a few more examples -

pilar_thumb.gif
juan_thumb.gif
concepcion_thumb.gif



GISS and NOAA have yet to respond. what do you think is more likely? an open and transparent explanation of the 'correction'? or a disappearance of the past data? judging how past information and intermediate calculation steps have been vanishing over the last few years I am betting that even more stonewalling is about to occur.

hopefully some influential media outlets will give this story enough public exposure that this problem will have to be investigated.

All Of Paraguay rsquo s Temperature Record Has Been Tampered With NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT


Reminds me of the Michael Mann Song.. HIDE THE DECLINE..

 
fabrication of data to support the failed hypothesis is paramount. Even the EPA is now changing their tune and its now about the "children and asthma" even though there is NO EVIDENCE to support this lie.

The alarmist, communist, socialist pieces of crap are scrambling to keep the curtain up around their lies. A system wide audit of all data is warranted. Look fast because just like the EAU it will vanish once the "better" data is created.
 
a few days ago I posted up some temp stations from Paraquay to show that the hotspot in south america that is part of the 'hottest year evah' were in fact warmer only because of adjustments.

Paul Homewood has investigated all of the stations in Paraquay now, and they all follow the same pattern.

a few more examples -

pilar_thumb.gif
juan_thumb.gif
concepcion_thumb.gif



GISS and NOAA have yet to respond. what do you think is more likely? an open and transparent explanation of the 'correction'? or a disappearance of the past data? judging how past information and intermediate calculation steps have been vanishing over the last few years I am betting that even more stonewalling is about to occur.

hopefully some influential media outlets will give this story enough public exposure that this problem will have to be investigated.

All Of Paraguay rsquo s Temperature Record Has Been Tampered With NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT


Reminds me of the Michael Mann Song.. HIDE THE DECLINE..



I love that video. I showed it to my stepson, and he laughed his ass off.
 
Really? No one gives a shit about the changes being arbitrarily enacted on temperature records? Dozens of pages discussing whether 0.01C is a new record but no one notices when a thermometer reading from 50 years ago has a few degrees lopped off?

This is the new behind the scenes fabrications the left is doing to facilitate the continuance of the lie and reasoning for the theft from hard working Americans who are struggling under the tyranny of the left.
 
Sure. I may be wasting my time. But sooner or later someone close enough to the actual data is going to get pissed off at how the public is being given the run around and he'll blow the whistle.

My guess it will be someone like John Nielson-Gammon. In charge of his state's records, already been under suspicion for under commitment to the 'Noble Cause', and a pretty strong belief in science over politics. It may not be him but sooner or later it will happen. Either in the US or elsewhere. Its a house of cards that's getting more unstable by the day.
 
I just visited SkS and found a video that supposedly explains the Paraguay fiasco. What a sad joke. No discussion of the types or sizes of the adjustments other than to say there may have been station moves. It actually says that other countries show warming so the Paraguay changes must be right! Another example of talking without saying anything. Politics over substance. They had an opportunity to show the public how this works but all it was was an appeal to authority.

I'll post up the video when I have a chance.
 
Why? Why not just post a link to the original? Like this:

http://www.skepticalscience.com/kevin-cowtan-debunks-christopher-booker-temp-conspiracy-theory.html

I find the explanations and arguments presented quite convincing. Your characterization of the tests the results are put to are flawed and I think you know that to be the case.

The thing is only a few minutes long and is completely understandable. I encourage everyone to watch the thing and make up your own minds.
 
Last edited:
Kevin Cowtan Debunks Christopher Booker s Temperature Conspiracy Theory

In The Telegraph, Christopher Booker accused climate scientists of falsifying the global surface temperature data, claiming trends have been "falsified" through a "wholesale corruption of proper science." Booker's argument focuses on adjustments made to raw data from temperature stations in Paraguay. In the video below, Kevin Cowtan examines the data and explains why the adjustments in question are clearly justified and necessary, revealing the baselessness of Booker's conspiracy theory.

The video features a prototype tool for investigating the global temperature record. This tool will be made available with the upcoming MOOC, Making Sense of Climate Science Denial, where we will interactively debunk myths regarding surface temperature records.

Interesting, on redirect, the page could not be found. But got it right away by putting it on a search engine.
 
And, for now, I go immediatly to the Skeptical Science site on my post, but still get 'cannot be found' on Crick's post. Very interesting.
 
And, for now, I go immediatly to the Skeptical Science site on my post, but still get 'cannot be found' on Crick's post. Very interesting.





Yep. I can't get if from cricks either. Yours seems to work fine however.
 
Kevin Cowtan Debunks Christopher Booker s Temperature Conspiracy Theory

In The Telegraph, Christopher Booker accused climate scientists of falsifying the global surface temperature data, claiming trends have been "falsified" through a "wholesale corruption of proper science." Booker's argument focuses on adjustments made to raw data from temperature stations in Paraguay. In the video below, Kevin Cowtan examines the data and explains why the adjustments in question are clearly justified and necessary, revealing the baselessness of Booker's conspiracy theory.

The video features a prototype tool for investigating the global temperature record. This tool will be made available with the upcoming MOOC, Making Sense of Climate Science Denial, where we will interactively debunk myths regarding surface temperature records.

Interesting, on redirect, the page could not be found. But got it right away by putting it on a search engine.







So, he admits that the records are correct. Then states that the weather station workers never calibrated their instruments so NOAA has to go back and alter the records. He gives no proof that it was necessary. He merely says that because the stations in other places didn't conform then they had to change Paraguay to match.

He then says that if they compare the new with the original EVEN with their new data still shows that the warming isn't happening as fast as the AGW supporters claim it is. 10% less to be exact. And all of that is based on calcs based on algorithms that can be changed at whim.

He doesn't actually answer anything. He merely trots out yet another unsubstantiated excuse for data falsification. And then tries to rationalize it with data from other points.
 
Ah yes, the whole of the scientific structure in the world is fraudulent, and we can only trust anonymous posters on the internet to tell the truth. Need a donation for more tinfoil for your hats?
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top