Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to Fox anyway.
Well, somebody's fired.
Wonkette : All 193% of Republicans Support Palin, Romney and Huckabee
Can I get an equivalency ruling on MSNBS with Olbermann and Maddow? Are they blindly adhering to a wingnut philosophy? Is intelligence and sense a requirement, benefit or detriment to working at that no longer cellar dwelling network (having just been bumped by CNN off the bottom by their sheer failure not any accomplishment on MSNBC's part).Fox hires based on blind adherence to wingnut philosophy, intelligence and sense are not a requirement for working there. LOL
Can I get an equivalency ruling on MSNBS with Olbermann and Maddow? Are they blindly adhering to a wingnut philosophy? Is intelligence and sense a requirement, benefit or detriment to working at that no longer cellar dwelling network (having just been bumped by CNN off the bottom by their sheer failure not any accomplishment on MSNBC's part).Fox hires based on blind adherence to wingnut philosophy, intelligence and sense are not a requirement for working there. LOL
If you're going to basically try to play gotcha with this... you should be prepared to acknowledge the failures of the paragons of the State Controlled Media.
Just trying to help alert people to rampant hypocrisy wherever I go. Consider it one of the many services. Thank you for the sarcasm, though. It was entertaining in it's attempt at refutation. But really. Are we going to apply the same standard of criticism to MSNBC, or stick with a double standard as is the norm in the State Controlled Media and it's acolytes?Can I get an equivalency ruling on MSNBS with Olbermann and Maddow? Are they blindly adhering to a wingnut philosophy? Is intelligence and sense a requirement, benefit or detriment to working at that no longer cellar dwelling network (having just been bumped by CNN off the bottom by their sheer failure not any accomplishment on MSNBC's part).Fox hires based on blind adherence to wingnut philosophy, intelligence and sense are not a requirement for working there. LOL
If you're going to basically try to play gotcha with this... you should be prepared to acknowledge the failures of the paragons of the State Controlled Media.
you sir, get the deflection award. please learn logic 101 and then trying posting again
LOL
wonkette
what an unbiased source
this would depend on the story behind the graphic
it COULD have been how many would support which candidate and been multiple choice
which the fucking moron wonkette didnt explain
yes, it was a stupid graphicLOL
wonkette
what an unbiased source
this would depend on the story behind the graphic
it COULD have been how many would support which candidate and been multiple choice
which the fucking moron wonkette didnt explain
Fun Fact: They used favorability ratings, which shouldn't be expressed in a pie chart.
yes, it was a stupid graphic
and this is somehow news that a news org used a stupid or error filled graphic?
LOL
what the fuck are you talking aboutyes, it was a stupid graphic
and this is somehow news that a news org used a stupid or error filled graphic?
LOL
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/112009_palin.pdf
Now that I have confirmed the validity, you move the goal posts like a fool, don't do so. It was on the web and posted.
Seriously, look at some of the threads those on your side of the table post as so called news, then come back and tell me what is considered news.
what the fuck are you talking about
i moved NOTHING
"god damned what the fuck is your problem?
No goal posts were moved. You are high.yes, it was a stupid graphic
and this is somehow news that a news org used a stupid or error filled graphic?
LOL
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/112009_palin.pdf
Now that I have confirmed the validity, you move the goal posts like a fool, don't do so. It was on the web and posted.
Seriously, look at some of the threads those on your side of the table post as so called news, then come back and tell me what is considered news.
Oh thank God! I was wondering if I was the one high. I didn't see any goalposts either. So ummm... were they moved before we got here or are we at the wrong place?No goal posts were moved. You are high.yes, it was a stupid graphic
and this is somehow news that a news org used a stupid or error filled graphic?
LOL
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/112009_palin.pdf
Now that I have confirmed the validity, you move the goal posts like a fool, don't do so. It was on the web and posted.
Seriously, look at some of the threads those on your side of the table post as so called news, then come back and tell me what is considered news.
yes, it was a stupid graphicLOL
wonkette
what an unbiased source
this would depend on the story behind the graphic
it COULD have been how many would support which candidate and been multiple choice
which the fucking moron wonkette didnt explain
Fun Fact: They used favorability ratings, which shouldn't be expressed in a pie chart.
and this is somehow news that a news org used a stupid or error filled graphic?
LOL
"Have already showed"? LMAO. And you link me to a moving the goal posts definition at an English site?If some people want to act snarky, be my guest. However, I have already showed exactly what that is. Time to find another thread to try and troll folks.
wonkette is a well know far left MOONBAT sitewhat the fuck are you talking about
i moved NOTHING
"god damned what the fuck is your problem?
First you attacked the source. Then you questioned it's existence or validity. I proved it was real.
Then you questioned whether it was news.
That is moving the goal posts.
