Academics called breastfeeding 'ethically problematic' because it endorses 'gender roles.' Their view is gaining traction.

[excalibur]

The insanity is getting worse, aided and abetted by the Democratic Party.

​

Hospitals in the United Kingdom have begun using the term “chestfeeding” instead of “breastfeeding,” just years after U.S. academics published a study in which they argued that the promotion of breastfeeding as the "natural" way to feed a child has many negative societal effects.​

​

In early 2021, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals in the United Kingdom drew international criticism for swapping the word “breastfeeding” for “chestfeeding” in an attempt to be more inclusive of transgender individuals.​

​

Likewise, Harvard Medical School referred to women as “birthing people” in an effort to “include those who identify as non-binary or transgender," as Campus Reform previously reported. ​

​

“We are concerned about breastfeeding promotion that praises breastfeeding as the ‘natural’ way to feed infants,” wrote Jessica Martucci of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Anne Barnhill of Johns Hopkins University in the journal Pediatrics. “Promoting breastfeeding as ‘natural’ may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that ‘natural’ approaches are presumptively healthier."​

​

...​

Academics called breastfeeding 'ethically problematic' because it endorses 'gender roles.' Their view is gaining traction.

U.S. academics wrote in study published in 2016 that the promotion of breastfeeding as the "natural" way to feed infants is "ethically problematic."

www.campusreform.org

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

The insanity is getting worse, aided and abetted by the Democratic Party.

​

Hospitals in the United Kingdom have begun using the term “chestfeeding” instead of “breastfeeding,” just years after U.S. academics published a study in which they argued that the promotion of breastfeeding as the "natural" way to feed a child has many negative societal effects.​

​

In early 2021, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals in the United Kingdom drew international criticism for swapping the word “breastfeeding” for “chestfeeding” in an attempt to be more inclusive of transgender individuals.​

​

Likewise, Harvard Medical School referred to women as “birthing people” in an effort to “include those who identify as non-binary or transgender," as Campus Reform previously reported. ​

​

“We are concerned about breastfeeding promotion that praises breastfeeding as the ‘natural’ way to feed infants,” wrote Jessica Martucci of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Anne Barnhill of Johns Hopkins University in the journal Pediatrics. “Promoting breastfeeding as ‘natural’ may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that ‘natural’ approaches are presumptively healthier."​

​

...​

Academics called breastfeeding 'ethically problematic' because it endorses 'gender roles.' Their view is gaining traction.

U.S. academics wrote in study published in 2016 that the promotion of breastfeeding as the "natural" way to feed infants is "ethically problematic."

www.campusreform.org

This is just a joke you are playng on us right?

 

[daveman]

I call academics retarded because they're retarded.

 

[ViewFromAbove]

The insanity is getting worse, aided and abetted by the Democratic Party.

​

Hospitals in the United Kingdom have begun using the term “chestfeeding” instead of “breastfeeding,” just years after U.S. academics published a study in which they argued that the promotion of breastfeeding as the "natural" way to feed a child has many negative societal effects.​

​

In early 2021, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals in the United Kingdom drew international criticism for swapping the word “breastfeeding” for “chestfeeding” in an attempt to be more inclusive of transgender individuals.​

​

Likewise, Harvard Medical School referred to women as “birthing people” in an effort to “include those who identify as non-binary or transgender," as Campus Reform previously reported. ​

​

“We are concerned about breastfeeding promotion that praises breastfeeding as the ‘natural’ way to feed infants,” wrote Jessica Martucci of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Anne Barnhill of Johns Hopkins University in the journal Pediatrics. “Promoting breastfeeding as ‘natural’ may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that ‘natural’ approaches are presumptively healthier."​

​

...​

Academics called breastfeeding 'ethically problematic' because it endorses 'gender roles.' Their view is gaining traction.

U.S. academics wrote in study published in 2016 that the promotion of breastfeeding as the "natural" way to feed infants is "ethically problematic."

www.campusreform.org

How is the Democratic Party involved?

 

[Muhammed]

The insanity is getting worse, aided and abetted by the Democratic Party.

​

Hospitals in the United Kingdom have begun using the term “chestfeeding” instead of “breastfeeding,” just years after U.S. academics published a study in which they argued that the promotion of breastfeeding as the "natural" way to feed a child has many negative societal effects.​

​

In early 2021, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals in the United Kingdom drew international criticism for swapping the word “breastfeeding” for “chestfeeding” in an attempt to be more inclusive of transgender individuals.​

​

Likewise, Harvard Medical School referred to women as “birthing people” in an effort to “include those who identify as non-binary or transgender," as Campus Reform previously reported. ​

​

“We are concerned about breastfeeding promotion that praises breastfeeding as the ‘natural’ way to feed infants,” wrote Jessica Martucci of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Anne Barnhill of Johns Hopkins University in the journal Pediatrics. “Promoting breastfeeding as ‘natural’ may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that ‘natural’ approaches are presumptively healthier."​

​

...​

Academics called breastfeeding 'ethically problematic' because it endorses 'gender roles.' Their view is gaining traction.

U.S. academics wrote in study published in 2016 that the promotion of breastfeeding as the "natural" way to feed infants is "ethically problematic."

www.campusreform.org

That's some serious moonbattery right there.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Good grief

 

[JOSweetHeart]

Perhaps this is the reason why a breast pump was eventually invented.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

 

[Sunsettommy]

Men have breasts too

Boom there goes the stupid gender identification crap.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Men have breasts too

Boom there goes the stupid gender identification crap.

Any dude wanting a baby to suckle his breast needs reported to child services. Fact

 

[Vikrant]

It is a very interesting news

 

[OldLady]

The insanity is getting worse, aided and abetted by the Democratic Party.

​

Hospitals in the United Kingdom have begun using the term “chestfeeding” instead of “breastfeeding,” just years after U.S. academics published a study in which they argued that the promotion of breastfeeding as the "natural" way to feed a child has many negative societal effects.​

​

In early 2021, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals in the United Kingdom drew international criticism for swapping the word “breastfeeding” for “chestfeeding” in an attempt to be more inclusive of transgender individuals.​

​

Likewise, Harvard Medical School referred to women as “birthing people” in an effort to “include those who identify as non-binary or transgender," as Campus Reform previously reported. ​

​

“We are concerned about breastfeeding promotion that praises breastfeeding as the ‘natural’ way to feed infants,” wrote Jessica Martucci of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and Anne Barnhill of Johns Hopkins University in the journal Pediatrics. “Promoting breastfeeding as ‘natural’ may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that ‘natural’ approaches are presumptively healthier."​

​

...​

Academics called breastfeeding 'ethically problematic' because it endorses 'gender roles.' Their view is gaining traction.

U.S. academics wrote in study published in 2016 that the promotion of breastfeeding as the "natural" way to feed infants is "ethically problematic."

www.campusreform.org

Breastfeeding is supposed to be better for baby, they say, but it hasn't always been that way. In 1970, only 22% of American women breastfed. Now it's weird if they don't. I'm all for not putting moral judgments on it, though.