Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The left keep calling abortion a “reproductive right”, and any restriction on abortion an attack on “reproductive rights”.
The definition of reproduction is as follows:
Definition of reproduction
1: the act or process of reproducingspecifically : the process by which plants and animals give rise to offspring and which fundamentally consists of the segregation of a portion of the parental body by a sexual or an asexual process and its subsequent growth and differentiation into a new individual
2: something reproduced : COPY
3: young seedling trees in a forest
So as you can clearly see, reproduction is the act of making offspring.
Conception of a new human is reproduction, the creation of life is reproduction.
Abortion is the exact opposite of that. It is the intentional killing of the life that has already been created. Ending life is not reproduction. Thus, abortion is not a “reproductive right”.
No one is disputing that women have a “reproductive rights”. In other words, no one is outlawing or persecuting women for creating life. But abortion is not a reproductive act, thus it is not a “reproductive right”.
A woman who has gotten pregnant has already exercised her “reproductive rights”. She does not have “the right” to end that life.
People can and do find disreputable surgeons to amputate limbsYou can do with your body as you wish.
Abortion is a medical procedure... someone else is doing something to your body.
You couldn't have your health heart removed...and you can't have a healthy limb amputated.
How is this any different from that?
Fetus is merely a POTENTIAL human beingYou are absolutely right, and that's what I say all the time!
It irks the hell out of me when I see those disingenuous ghouls call it "reproductive rights" when the reality is that once you're pregnant, you have already reproduced! Therefore abortion is not "reproductive rights" its about "killing rights", and we all know there is no right to kill an innocent human being.
Fetus is merely a POTENTIAL human being
You cannot be so barbaric as to force a woman to carry an unwanted child to term
A fetus isn't human? You've been having some unnatural sex?Fetus is merely a POTENTIAL human being
You cannot be so barbaric as to force a woman to carry an unwanted child to term
I see that as truth in advertising, myself.The issue is not that the unborn are not the same as what the mother is, the question is, is the mother human?
For many on the Left, they are just animals, not human. They even admit as much
View attachment 662918
Of course to many on the right the mother is not human, she’s an incubator who’s primary function is to grow new life.The issue is not that the unborn are not the same as what the mother is, the question is, is the mother human?
For many on the Left, they are just animals, not human. They even admit as much
View attachment 662918
Who is forcing them to get pregnant?
I‘ve noticed the usual suspects on social media blaming men for all their pregnancies. As if they had no choice in having sex? As if the woman doesn’t have the ability to use birth control?
Yet you can have healthy fat liposuctioned, perfectly good noses surgically modified…You can do with your body as you wish.
Abortion is a medical procedure... someone else is doing something to your body.
You couldn't have your health heart removed...and you can't have a healthy limb amputated.
How is this any different from that?
"According to ONE religion"It's not two bodies until the baby is born according to one major religion.
Do women own their own bodies or does the Nanny State own part of their bodies now. Forcing women to be baby factories against their will. Help! It's the Nanny State.
Potential beings that actually physically exist. . .Fetus is merely a POTENTIAL human being
You cannot be so barbaric as to force a woman to carry an unwanted child to term
"According to ONE religion"
Cherry picking to the extreme and ... let's just say "fuck you" to the (secular) biological facts. Right?
DERP.Is a fertilized egg a human being? Can a 21 week old fetus survive outside the womb?
DERP.
A human being is a human being.
A HUMAN "fertilized egg" is indeed "HUMAN" being/ organism - once the fertilization is successful and it results in a "HUMAN" being "conceived.
Are YOU a "HUMAN being?"
Were YOU not "conceived?"
I am and I was.
Now, as to whether a HUMAN BEING in the 21st week (fetal stage ) of THEIR life can survive or not - outside the womb?
Whether they can or can't does not change what they ARE.
"A human being is a human being. "
Even if they are a human being that "can't survive" in any particular environment.
I bolded HUMAN to make the point that YOU failed to specify what species of "fetus" you were asking about.Since you bolded human you must think there is a distinction between a single cell of unique human DNA and a fully functional human being baby.
Sure ... But does that end a life?Yet you can have healthy fat liposuctioned, perfectly good noses surgically modified…
I'm resisting the temptation (not very well) to make a comment about certain posters undergoing brain removal, here.Sure ... But does that end a life?
Try having your healthy lungs removed.
Can you actually find a quote?Of course to many on the right the mother is not human, she’s an incubator who’s primary function is to grow new life.
