Abortion and the Constitution

" Terms Per Son Should Be Replaced With Individual In Constitutions "

* Per Son Movement Denies Countable By Census And Male *

I wonder what legal document establishes the state's duty to define what a person is? Certainly there is nothing like that in the US Constitution, so the federal government has no such lawful duty. Where do you find that in a state constitution?
The term person appears in us 14th amendment as entitled to equal protection with a us citizen , which requires live birth , while title 1 section 8 of us code defines a person as a homo sapiens sapiens born alive at any stage of development .

Not only did the dumbfounded ruling of dobbs commit sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments , as the enumerated rite of equal protection with a citizen requires live birth , the dobbs court also committed malfeasance against the statutory definition of a person in title 1 section 8 of us code .

An etymology of the term person is deconstructed into per , as in countable by census , and son , as in male .

An inference from the term person in us 14th amendment implies that , as females are not sons then females are not citizens , else see suffrage of women .
 
Last edited:
I was married for 31 years. And Humans are not Insects who go by "Instinct". Humans are supposed to be reasoning beings. Promiscuous sex is pure animal. Good for spreading AIDS and VD. And getting knocked up.
Yes, we're supposed to be reasoning beings, yet 2 out of 3 humans joined the herd and became crash test dummies for Pharma.

We're supposed to be honest too, but oh the web we weave when first we practice to deceive.
 

Forum List

Back
Top