Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 3,696
- 915
- 140
" Terms Per Son Should Be Replaced With Individual In Constitutions "
* Per Son Movement Denies Countable By Census And Male *
Not only did the dumbfounded ruling of dobbs commit sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments , as the enumerated rite of equal protection with a citizen requires live birth , the dobbs court also committed malfeasance against the statutory definition of a person in title 1 section 8 of us code .
An etymology of the term person is deconstructed into per , as in countable by census , and son , as in male .
An inference from the term person in us 14th amendment implies that , as females are not sons then females are not citizens , else see suffrage of women .
* Per Son Movement Denies Countable By Census And Male *
The term person appears in us 14th amendment as entitled to equal protection with a us citizen , which requires live birth , while title 1 section 8 of us code defines a person as a homo sapiens sapiens born alive at any stage of development .I wonder what legal document establishes the state's duty to define what a person is? Certainly there is nothing like that in the US Constitution, so the federal government has no such lawful duty. Where do you find that in a state constitution?
Not only did the dumbfounded ruling of dobbs commit sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments , as the enumerated rite of equal protection with a citizen requires live birth , the dobbs court also committed malfeasance against the statutory definition of a person in title 1 section 8 of us code .
An etymology of the term person is deconstructed into per , as in countable by census , and son , as in male .
An inference from the term person in us 14th amendment implies that , as females are not sons then females are not citizens , else see suffrage of women .
Last edited: