A third of U.S. public believes 9/11 conspiracy theory

-Cp

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2004
2,911
362
48
Earth
More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll.

The national survey of 1,010 adults also found that anger against the federal government is at record levels, with 54 percent saying they "personally are more angry" at the government than they used to be.

Widespread resentment and alienation toward the national government appears to be fueling a growing acceptance of conspiracy theories about the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Suspicions that the 9/11 attacks were "an inside job" - the common phrase used by conspiracy theorists on the Internet - quickly have become nearly as popular as decades-old conspiracy theories that the federal government was responsible for President John F. Kennedy's assassination and that it has covered up proof of space aliens.

Seventy percent of people who give credence to these theories also say they've become angrier with the federal government than they used to be.

Thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them "because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East."

"One out of three sounds high, but that may very well be right," said Lee Hamilton, former vice chairman of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also called the 9/11 commission.) His congressionally appointed investigation concluded that federal officials bungled their attempts to prevent, but did not participate in, the attacks by al Qaeda five years ago.

"A lot of people I've encountered believe the U.S. government was involved," Hamilton said. "Many say the government planned the whole thing. Of course, we don't think the evidence leads that way at all."

The poll also found that 16 percent of Americans speculate that secretly planted explosives, not burning passenger jets, were the real reason the massive twin towers of the World Trade Center collapsed.

Conspiracy groups for at least two years have also questioned why the World Trade Center collapsed when fires that heavily damaged similar skyscrapers around the world did not cause such destruction. Sixteen percent said it's "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that "the collapse of the twin towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the two buildings."

Twelve percent suspect the Pentagon was struck by a military cruise missile in 2001 rather than by an airliner captured by terrorists.

That lower percentage may result from an effort by the conservative Washington-based Judicial Watch advocacy group to debunk the claim. The group filed claims under the Freedom of Information Act and got two fill loops released from Pentagon security cameras.

"Some people claim they can't see anything, but I see a plane hitting the Pentagon at incredibly high speed," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "I see the nose of the plane clearly entering the frame of one video and the tail of the plane entering the Pentagon in the other video."

Many conspiracy Web sites have posted the video loops and report the films are inconclusive or were manipulated by the government.

"Some folks will never be convinced," Fitton said. "But I'm hoping that these videos will dissuade reasonable people from falling into a trap with these conspiracy theories."

University of Florida law professor Mark Fenster, author of the book "Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture," said the poll's findings reflect public anger at the unpopular Iraq war, realization that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction and growing doubts of the veracity of the Bush administration.

"What has amazed me is not that there are conspiracy theories, but that they didn't seem to be getting any purchase among the American public until the last year or so," Fenster said. "Although the Iraq war was not directly related to the 9/11 attacks, people are now looking back at 9/11 with much more skepticism than they used to."

Conspiracy-believing participants in the poll agree their suspicions are recent.

"I certainly didn't think of conspiracies when 9/11 first happened," said Elaine Tripp, 62, of Tabernacle, N.J. "I don't know if President Bush was aware of the exact time it was going to happen. But he certainly didn't do enough to stop it. Bush was so intent on having his own little war."

Garrett Johnson, 19, of Manassas, Va., said it was "well after the fact" before he started questioning the official explanation of the attacks. "But then people I know started talking about it. And the Internet had a lot to do with this. After reading all of the different articles there, I started to think we weren't being told the truth."

The Scripps Survey Research Center at Ohio University has tracked the level of resentment people feel toward the federal government since 1995, starting shortly after Timothy McVeigh bombed the federal building in Oklahoma City. Forty-seven percent then said they, personally, feel "more angry at the federal government" than they used to. That percentage dropped to 42 percent in 1997, 34 percent in 1998 and only 12 percent shortly after 9/11 during the groundswell of patriotism and support for the government after the attacks.

But the new survey found that 77 percent say their friends and acquaintances have become angrier with government recently and 54 percent say they, themselves, have become angrier - both record levels.

The survey also found that people who regularly use the Internet but who do not regularly use so-called "mainstream" media are significantly more likely to believe in 9/11 conspiracies. People who regularly read daily newspapers or listen to radio newscasts were especially unlikely to believe in the conspiracies.

"We know that there are a lot of people now asking questions," said Janice Matthews, executive director of 911Truth.org, one of the most sophisticated Internet sites raising doubts about official explanations of the attacks. "We didn't have the Internet after Pearl Harbor, the Gulf of Tonkin or the Kennedy assassination. But we live in different times now."

Matthews' Web site averaged 4,000 "hits" a day last year, but currently has at least 12,000 visits every 24 hours. The site, according to its online policy statement, is dedicated to showing the public that "elements within the U.S. government must have orchestrated or participated in the execution of the attacks for these to have happened the way in which they did."

Participants in the poll were asked to respond to "several serious accusations that some people have made against the federal government in recent years." Five conspiracy theories were described and participants were asked if each was "very likely, somewhat likely or unlikely."

The level of suspicion of U.S. official involvement in a 9/11 conspiracy was only slightly behind the 40 percent who suspect "officials in the federal government were directly responsible for the assassination of President Kennedy" and the 38 percent who believe "the federal government is withholding proof of the existence of intelligent life from other planets."

The poll found that a majority of young adults give at least some credence to a 9/11 conspiracy compared to less than a fourth of people 65 or older. Members of racial and ethnic minorities, people with only a high school education and Democrats were especially likely to suspect federal involvement in 9/11.

The survey was conducted by telephone from July 6-24 at the Scripps Survey Research Center at the University of Ohio under a grant from the Scripps Howard Foundation. The poll has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.


http://www.knoxnews.com/kns/national/article/0,1406,KNS_350_4888448,00.html
 
-Cp said:
More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll.

Doesn't that just about cover the number of people who voted for Kerry?
 
Well let's see here!

OK, 9% of Americans are supposedly queer.

5% are unemployed

About 5 to 8% are illegal aliens

1 or 2 % are homeless or one check away from it

6% are college students and subjected to folks like Ward Churchill for their guidance

Alot of folks are just fucking stupid.

So, the question is, why did so many Democrats say they DID NOT believe that the government conspired to plan the attacks?
 
manu1959 said:
lets say....the feds did blow up the wtc.....why?

It would be a good excuse for bigger budgets and/or a war that was already being discussed during the Clinton years.
 
Emmett said:
Too deep! Requires an answer not just speculative rhetoric, I predict you WILL NOT get an answer to that question!

lets play ..... you tell me .....

we blew it up so we could: have our pupet osama claim that they did it so we could invade afganistan and take over the opium trade?
 
BaronVonBigmeat said:
It would be a good excuse for bigger budgets and/or a war that was already being discussed during the Clinton years.

why not just go to war.....why do we need an excuse?.....we invaded ..... vietnam....korea.....somalia.....grenada...bosnia....didn't blow anything up to do that
 
The plan actually originated in a Washington pier house next to the river and involved two mid level opium dealers who were unsatisfied with their current market share. Given their connections in the 1998 White House they convinced Billy NOT to get Osama so they could hash out this plan to blow up shit and lead to your version of the rest of it.
 
manu1959 said:
why not just go to war.....why do we need an excuse?.....we invaded ..... vietnam....korea.....somalia.....grenada...bosnia....didn't blow anything up to do that

You don't have to have an excuse, but without one you will be much more likely to lose votes; whereas with an attack, the voters rally around you and your poll numbers are invincible, for a time. Vietnam had the Gulf of Tonkin incident. Somalia, Grenada, Bosnia were all minor shitholes so it didn't matter. Korea was a major war which didn't have a major excuse, thus it was fairly unpopular.
 
GunnyL said:
Doesn't that just about cover the number of people who voted for Kerry?

Actually, it's Chimpy's base. :D

And given his administration's propensity for lying, it's no wonder people believe the conspiracy theories over government explanation.
 
Bullypulpit said:
Actually, it's Chimpy's base. :D

And given his administration's propensity for lying, it's no wonder people believe the conspiracy theories over government explanation.


Can you tell us what the administration has lied about?
 
conspiracy theorists should not be allowed to vote.

Maybe we should spin a conspiracy about how voting gets you on the CIA death list. :tinfoil:
 
Bullypulpit said:
It would be far simpler to tell what they haven't lied about.

Well since you obviously follow what they say so closely - do tell...
 

Forum List

Back
Top