A Serious Question For A Serious Issue

[Flanders]

Let me begin by saying that a little research will provide tons of material written by Americans who oppose the United Nations as well as fear a Secretary General Bill Clinton. You won’t find it in the mainstream media, but you will find countless articles written by reputable journalists who do the best they can do without jeopardizing their careers (incomes). I, along with many others, have no such restraints preventing us from exposing the United Nations in plain English.

Politicians always claim they want to talk about the issues. If Republicans are telling the truth they should not mind answering a question that is so important all others pale by comparison:

Will you veto Bill Clinton, or Barack Obama, before he is offered up for a vote in the General Assembly?

In light of what the Clintons and Taqiyya the Liar did to this country to date, I do not see how any Republican can answer the question with a NO.

Let me go back to my first message board in 2000 while Hillary was campaigning for the US senate. I posted this brief warning:

Try this disaster on for size: President Mrs. Clinton in the White House and Secretary General William J. Clinton in the U.N.

Eulogy: Farewell freedom from government. Farewell you poor, tired, worn-out, old ideal; there was a time when Americans loved thee.​

Since that first message on the issue, I posted many more about the Clinton dream; President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton saving the world together. Here are some of the things I said for anybody who is interested. I put them in chronological order as they appear in my INCOMPLETE records. In the early years I never imagined I would be posting messages 16 years later; so my records from my first three or four message boards did not include dates.

NOTE: My messages were stored on a floppy disc for a few years. Those records were eventually transferred to CDs. Those records were finally transferred to a flash-drive. Needles to say, I lost a lot of files along the way.

My focus is on the Clintons; so the text leading up to, and following, my samples is not included:

Mrs. Clinton only ran in NY because the U.N. is there. Had U.N. headquarters been located in Alaska, that is where she would have ran for a seat in the U.S. Senate. Prior to the 2000 elections, I mistakenly believed that she would chair the Foreign Relations Committee if she won, and if the Democrats ever took back the senate. My mistaken assessment on that score does not change what is happening in the senate. Senator Clinton, and by extension former President Clinton, are calling the shots where the U.N. is concerned. Even putting the U.N. money laundering scheme aside, the Clintons are the Democratic party’s most effective big time fund raisers; so any Democrat not presently supporting the Clinton agenda who expects help at reelection time will dance to the Clinton tune — — or else go it alone with no help from the Democratic National Committee. Rather than talk about the Clinton legacy take a look at the Clinton fantasy: Secretary General William J. Clinton and President Hillary Clinton. My God! if that prospect doesn’t scare the hell out of freedom-lovin’ Americans, I don’t know what it will take to get Americans to take the international socialist/communist threat seriously.

NOTE: When the General Assembly is ready to payoff Clinton for services rendered by electing him secretary-general, the only way to stop it will be for the United States to exercise its Security Council veto. That certainly won’t happen if Hillary, or any Democrat, is president at the time. In fact, can anyone see an American president of any persuasion using a Security Council veto to stop a former American president from becoming secretary-general? A politician with the orbs it will take to stand up to that kind of media crucifixion isn’t even in the pipeline yet.

XXXXX ​

The more the UN spends, the more the American people pay. Can you imagine what a big spender like Secretary General Clinton would spend on foreign welfare programs knowing that Communists in the US Congress would protect UN funding while the mainstream press shielded them? I've always thought of Clinton as an institutional snake. I was wrong. He's half fox.

XXXXX​

One of the reasons that Clinton so desperately wants the secretary-general’s job is to obscure the enemy factor justifiably associated with the office itself. Clinton is counting on not being seen as an enemy in the American public’s eye. After all, he is “we.” The mainstream propaganda machinery will report any warnings about Secretary General Clinton as “The Clinton-haters are at it again.” Then, hopefully, Clinton can make the theft of American sovereignty easier for himself, and easier for every secretary-general that comes after him.

XXXXX​

4. If Gore somehow beats Bush, Billy Boy’s additional bonus for his loyalty is Goofy Annan’s job when the ol’ Goofer steps down on December 31, 2006. Putting him in at the UN has always been as important as is putting her in White House.

5. Secretary General Clinton and Vice President Clinton coordinate the efforts of Washington quislings in a way that previous secretaries-general only dreamed about. That’s not as good as having her in the top spot, but it’s better than an empty sack with a hole in it. In one sense she will be able to do quisling business much more freely — and quietly — than she could as president.

6. Why don’t the Clintons just bide their time until 2008? First answer: Because Senator Clinton is desperate to avoid the dreaded senate reelection race in 2006. The only thing the Clintons get if she loses in 2006 is pair of bus tickets back to Pumpkin Creek. Second answer: Every Democrat has a slight chance of upsetting Bush in ‘04. ...If that happens she will be out until 2012 even if she is returned to the senate in 2006.

XXXXX​

Clinton’s dealings with the UN while he was president gives them every reason to believe that he is the guy that can deliver American sovereignty to the international community.

The charity hustlers working for all of those UN bureaucracies will see Secretary General Clinton, and any Administration that spawns him, as a potential cash cow unparalleled in UN history.

XXXXX​

Their “shared interest in foreign affairs” is Beltway-speak for “How can we betray the country for the glory of the UN and get away with it?” President Kerry and Secretary General Clinton will be a form of hari-kari for American independence just as surely as it would be under President Hillary Clinton.

XXXXX​

DATED: 10/22/2004 4:37 AM Eastern Standard Time

Wow! Clinton wants Kofi’s job. What an October surprise of sorts. A Clinton insider and a senior U.N. source let the least best kept secret in the world out of the bag just before the election. The hope is that the official announcement will electrify global villagers; propelling them toward heroic deeds on November 2. More than likely the prospect of Clinton as secretary-general will terrify those eligible voters who don’t usually vote; prompting them to vote for Bush in record numbers.

If Kerry should somehow pull an up upset you know that Clinton will claim a piece of the credit. A big enough piece for Secretary General Clinton to claim a partnership with Kerry rather than Kerry pulling Clinton’s strings from the White House. Both men are UN loyalists; so the only conflict I can see arising between them as they work to destroy America’s independence is: “Who’s the boss?” I may be stretching it thin, but those two remind me of Lenin and Stalin. I just can’t decide which one is Stalin.

As for me: I’ll be upset if it happens; however, at my age Secretary General Clinton isn’t going to annoy me that much nor for that long. On the other hand, young voters, and children too young to vote, will pay a terrible price somewhere down the road if Clinton’s plans come to fruition.

XXXXX​

DATED: 2/28/2005 10:22 AM Eastern Standard Time

I’m now guessing that Bill Clinton won’t get Kofi Annan’s job next year because some resistance is forming within the ranks of influential conservatives led by former senator Jesse Helms. However, if Senator Clinton wins in 2008 her husband could still end up as the UN’s secretary general in 2011, or sooner if some misfortune should befall the man replacing Kofi in 2006. Secretary General Clinton working against America’s independence arm in arm with President Clinton will be no less of a tragedy for America in 2011 than it would have been had she been in a position to install Bill at the UN in 2006.

XXXXX​

DATED: 6/10/06 12:45 AM

Last year Clinton finally admitted in an interview that he would like the job. He let the cat out of the bag as though the idea had just occurred to him. If the prospect of a President Hillary Clinton and a Secretary General Bill Clinton doesn’t scare the apathy out of you —— you have to be brain dead.

Let’s first look at how one becomes secretary-general. The UN General Assembly votes on a nominee. Any member of the SC (Security Council) can veto a candidate before they are offered up for a vote in the General Assembly. In that case another nominee is found. President Clinton vetoed a second term for Boutros Boutros Galli so Kofi Annan could keep the seat warm for Clinton.

It is important to understand why four of the five permanent SC members won’t veto Clinton. Those four are France, Great Britain, Russia, and Clinton’s old pals in China. Clinton has long demonstrated that he wants to abolish sovereign nations; including the independence of his own country. Clinton’s track record has earned him the trust of the international community. He will do the right thing because the UN is his first loyalty after socialism. That’s what counts to UN member states, and that’s why Clinton will not be vetoed by the four I listed.

The SC understands how much the majority of Americans despise the UN. They also know that the only hope of turning Americans around is for the vast propaganda apparatus to sell the UN as mankind’s only hope of avoiding nuclear war, global warming, poverty, HIV/AIDS, and God only knows what else. To make the sale an American secretary-general is absolutely essential in order to kickoff a media propaganda campaign like you never thought possible. Every time Secretary General Clinton utters a word the press will report it around the clock as though utopia has finally arrived. Clinton is a cinch to get the required votes in the General Assembly.

The US is the fifth SC member and the only possible member that might veto Clinton. Does Bush have the guts for it? I doubt it. The media would go ballistic if Bush dares to veto their boy. To be fair to Bush, I don’t know if any president could standup to the media venom that is sure to spew out after such a veto.

Why not Secretary General Clinton? Where’s the harm?

1. Secretary General Clinton stands the best chance of moving America closer to accepting a global government. That government will be totalitarian. Clinton would not be for it if it is anything less.

2. The UN’s Declaration of Human Rights is a blueprint for a global welfare state paid for with taxes levied on the wealth producers in First World countries. Clinton’s knowledge of how Washington works will go a long way towards instituting that welfare state.

3. Clinton is not alone in his betrayal. There are a lot of influential Beltway insiders who will help Clinton abolish America’s sovereignty. They include a few Republicans as well as a majority of elected Democrats.

4. Secretary General Clinton, working with President Hillary Clinton, has the political savvy to finally put some kind of an international tax like the Tobin Tax in place. Even Senator Hillary Clinton in a Democrat-controlled senate offers Secretary General Clinton limitless opportunities to advance the socialist agenda. Just think of the UN treaties they will bring up for ratification!

XXXXX​

DATED: 3/27/2007 6:04 AM Eastern Standard Time

I always maintained that Bill becoming secretary-general was a key component in the Clinton agenda while the Clintons were still in the White House. The Clinton world looked rosier than ever after Mrs. Clinton won a senate seat and then was reelected in 2006. The bloom began to fade from the rose when Ban Ki-Moon took over after Kofi Annan departed.

Until a year or two ago the MSM kept Clinton’s designs on the job a secret from the general public. Even when Clinton did allude to the job he spoke as though it was an intriguing possibility that he would be interested in if he wasn’t doing anything else. She never talked about it at all until now.

Over the years my opposites scoffed every time I warned that a President Hillary Clinton and a Secretary General Bill Clinton would kill America’s independence as sure as night follows day. Many said that he would never get the job because the General Assembly would not vote for him. Others said that China and Russia would oppose Clinton with a Security Council veto when, in fact, those governments would have welcomed him with open arms as would the General Assembly. Ask yourself why?

XXXXX​

DATED: July 18, 2008

The Clintons have to be as bitter as a tree full of lemons. The Clinton Administration salvaged socialism’s infrastructure so that Hillary could reap the benefits. Not only did Obama ease on in, he killed the dream of President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton leading mankind in socialism’s triumphant return to importance in global politics. Clinton may, or may not, have been the first black president, but Obama is definitely the first black Clinton and they don’t like it one little bit.

XXXXX​

DATED: November 24, 2008

President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Secretary General Bill Clinton will be more damaging to this country than President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton would have been because Obama gets unconditional support from blacks worldwide. With the MSM covering for them there’s no telling what that unholy trinity will accomplish by way of betraying this country.

XXXXX​

DATED: Feb. 1, 2013

Now that her lies are in the public domain, now that the scandals are behind her, most Americans will say: WHO CARES.

Unfortunately, Socialists care. The global government crowd cares. They all know that 2016 is the last chance for President Hillary Clinton and UN Secretary General Bill Clinton to rule the world together. Nobody in the government media will report that those two will finish off America as a sovereign nation if Hussein does not beat them to it.

XXXXX​

DATED: June 24, 2014

I have to admit that I never thought Taqiyya the Liar was in the running for the top UN job. I knew the Clintons had their eye on the Secretary General’s job for a long time. The Clinton dream has long been President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton saving the world together. Barack Taqiyya and the Clintons after the same job triggers a monumental struggle in the dark corners of the New World Order; a struggle the public will never hear about until it is too late.

President Hillary Clinton’s Choice: Bill or Barack | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

This article is dated today:

Word has it is that Obama wants to be Secretary-General of the United Nations. Ban Ki-Moon’s term concludes at the end of 2016 and it just so happens that Obama is available. (It would be interesting if Obama resigned on New Year’s Day 2017 and let Joe Biden become President for the final 20 days of his term.)

Obama Could Become President of the Whole World
Now there’s talk he’ll be the next UN Secretary-General — just what Israel needs to hear.
By Aaron Goldstein – 1.11.16

Obama Could Become President of the Whole World​

I posted many more messages about President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton, as well as a ton of messages about the danger of remaining in the anti-America United Nations. Think about this picture if you watch that piece of garbage deliver his final State of the Union address tomorrow night:

​

http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2016-01/195896_5_.jpg

Bill, Hillary, and Taqiyya the Liar wiping their asses with the Constitution is the only picture that would more effectively expose their hatred for this country.

 

[saveliberty]

Serious reply: You think the UN means something?

 

[baileyn45]

Let me begin by saying that a little research will provide tons of material written by Americans who oppose the United Nations as well as fear a Secretary General Bill Clinton. You won’t find it in the mainstream media, but you will find countless articles written by reputable journalists who do the best they can do without jeopardizing their careers (incomes). I, along with many others, have no such restraints preventing us from exposing the United Nations in plain English.

Politicians always claim they want to talk about the issues. If Republicans are telling the truth they should not mind answering a question that is so important all others pale by comparison:

Will you veto Bill Clinton, or Barack Obama, before he is offered up for a vote in the General Assembly?

In light of what the Clintons and Taqiyya the Liar did to this country to date, I do not see how any Republican can answer the question with a NO.

Let me go back to my first message board in 2000 while Hillary was campaigning for the US senate. I posted this brief warning:

Try this disaster on for size: President Mrs. Clinton in the White House and Secretary General William J. Clinton in the U.N.

Eulogy: Farewell freedom from government. Farewell you poor, tired, worn-out, old ideal; there was a time when Americans loved thee.​

Since that first message on the issue, I posted many more about the Clinton dream; President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton saving the world together. Here are some of the things I said for anybody who is interested. I put them in chronological order as they appear in my INCOMPLETE records. In the early years I never imagined I would be posting messages 16 years later; so my records from my first three or four message boards did not include dates.

NOTE: My messages were stored on a floppy disc for a few years. Those records were eventually transferred to CDs. Those records were finally transferred to a flash-drive. Needles to say, I lost a lot of files along the way.

My focus is on the Clintons; so the text leading up to, and following, my samples is not included:

Mrs. Clinton only ran in NY because the U.N. is there. Had U.N. headquarters been located in Alaska, that is where she would have ran for a seat in the U.S. Senate. Prior to the 2000 elections, I mistakenly believed that she would chair the Foreign Relations Committee if she won, and if the Democrats ever took back the senate. My mistaken assessment on that score does not change what is happening in the senate. Senator Clinton, and by extension former President Clinton, are calling the shots where the U.N. is concerned. Even putting the U.N. money laundering scheme aside, the Clintons are the Democratic party’s most effective big time fund raisers; so any Democrat not presently supporting the Clinton agenda who expects help at reelection time will dance to the Clinton tune — — or else go it alone with no help from the Democratic National Committee. Rather than talk about the Clinton legacy take a look at the Clinton fantasy: Secretary General William J. Clinton and President Hillary Clinton. My God! if that prospect doesn’t scare the hell out of freedom-lovin’ Americans, I don’t know what it will take to get Americans to take the international socialist/communist threat seriously.

NOTE: When the General Assembly is ready to payoff Clinton for services rendered by electing him secretary-general, the only way to stop it will be for the United States to exercise its Security Council veto. That certainly won’t happen if Hillary, or any Democrat, is president at the time. In fact, can anyone see an American president of any persuasion using a Security Council veto to stop a former American president from becoming secretary-general? A politician with the orbs it will take to stand up to that kind of media crucifixion isn’t even in the pipeline yet.

XXXXX ​

The more the UN spends, the more the American people pay. Can you imagine what a big spender like Secretary General Clinton would spend on foreign welfare programs knowing that Communists in the US Congress would protect UN funding while the mainstream press shielded them? I've always thought of Clinton as an institutional snake. I was wrong. He's half fox.

XXXXX​

One of the reasons that Clinton so desperately wants the secretary-general’s job is to obscure the enemy factor justifiably associated with the office itself. Clinton is counting on not being seen as an enemy in the American public’s eye. After all, he is “we.” The mainstream propaganda machinery will report any warnings about Secretary General Clinton as “The Clinton-haters are at it again.” Then, hopefully, Clinton can make the theft of American sovereignty easier for himself, and easier for every secretary-general that comes after him.

XXXXX​

4. If Gore somehow beats Bush, Billy Boy’s additional bonus for his loyalty is Goofy Annan’s job when the ol’ Goofer steps down on December 31, 2006. Putting him in at the UN has always been as important as is putting her in White House.

5. Secretary General Clinton and Vice President Clinton coordinate the efforts of Washington quislings in a way that previous secretaries-general only dreamed about. That’s not as good as having her in the top spot, but it’s better than an empty sack with a hole in it. In one sense she will be able to do quisling business much more freely — and quietly — than she could as president.

6. Why don’t the Clintons just bide their time until 2008? First answer: Because Senator Clinton is desperate to avoid the dreaded senate reelection race in 2006. The only thing the Clintons get if she loses in 2006 is pair of bus tickets back to Pumpkin Creek. Second answer: Every Democrat has a slight chance of upsetting Bush in ‘04. ...If that happens she will be out until 2012 even if she is returned to the senate in 2006.

XXXXX​

Clinton’s dealings with the UN while he was president gives them every reason to believe that he is the guy that can deliver American sovereignty to the international community.

The charity hustlers working for all of those UN bureaucracies will see Secretary General Clinton, and any Administration that spawns him, as a potential cash cow unparalleled in UN history.

XXXXX​

Their “shared interest in foreign affairs” is Beltway-speak for “How can we betray the country for the glory of the UN and get away with it?” President Kerry and Secretary General Clinton will be a form of hari-kari for American independence just as surely as it would be under President Hillary Clinton.

XXXXX​

DATED: 10/22/2004 4:37 AM Eastern Standard Time

Wow! Clinton wants Kofi’s job. What an October surprise of sorts. A Clinton insider and a senior U.N. source let the least best kept secret in the world out of the bag just before the election. The hope is that the official announcement will electrify global villagers; propelling them toward heroic deeds on November 2. More than likely the prospect of Clinton as secretary-general will terrify those eligible voters who don’t usually vote; prompting them to vote for Bush in record numbers.

If Kerry should somehow pull an up upset you know that Clinton will claim a piece of the credit. A big enough piece for Secretary General Clinton to claim a partnership with Kerry rather than Kerry pulling Clinton’s strings from the White House. Both men are UN loyalists; so the only conflict I can see arising between them as they work to destroy America’s independence is: “Who’s the boss?” I may be stretching it thin, but those two remind me of Lenin and Stalin. I just can’t decide which one is Stalin.

As for me: I’ll be upset if it happens; however, at my age Secretary General Clinton isn’t going to annoy me that much nor for that long. On the other hand, young voters, and children too young to vote, will pay a terrible price somewhere down the road if Clinton’s plans come to fruition.

XXXXX​

DATED: 2/28/2005 10:22 AM Eastern Standard Time

I’m now guessing that Bill Clinton won’t get Kofi Annan’s job next year because some resistance is forming within the ranks of influential conservatives led by former senator Jesse Helms. However, if Senator Clinton wins in 2008 her husband could still end up as the UN’s secretary general in 2011, or sooner if some misfortune should befall the man replacing Kofi in 2006. Secretary General Clinton working against America’s independence arm in arm with President Clinton will be no less of a tragedy for America in 2011 than it would have been had she been in a position to install Bill at the UN in 2006.

XXXXX​

DATED: 6/10/06 12:45 AM

Last year Clinton finally admitted in an interview that he would like the job. He let the cat out of the bag as though the idea had just occurred to him. If the prospect of a President Hillary Clinton and a Secretary General Bill Clinton doesn’t scare the apathy out of you —— you have to be brain dead.

Let’s first look at how one becomes secretary-general. The UN General Assembly votes on a nominee. Any member of the SC (Security Council) can veto a candidate before they are offered up for a vote in the General Assembly. In that case another nominee is found. President Clinton vetoed a second term for Boutros Boutros Galli so Kofi Annan could keep the seat warm for Clinton.

It is important to understand why four of the five permanent SC members won’t veto Clinton. Those four are France, Great Britain, Russia, and Clinton’s old pals in China. Clinton has long demonstrated that he wants to abolish sovereign nations; including the independence of his own country. Clinton’s track record has earned him the trust of the international community. He will do the right thing because the UN is his first loyalty after socialism. That’s what counts to UN member states, and that’s why Clinton will not be vetoed by the four I listed.

The SC understands how much the majority of Americans despise the UN. They also know that the only hope of turning Americans around is for the vast propaganda apparatus to sell the UN as mankind’s only hope of avoiding nuclear war, global warming, poverty, HIV/AIDS, and God only knows what else. To make the sale an American secretary-general is absolutely essential in order to kickoff a media propaganda campaign like you never thought possible. Every time Secretary General Clinton utters a word the press will report it around the clock as though utopia has finally arrived. Clinton is a cinch to get the required votes in the General Assembly.

The US is the fifth SC member and the only possible member that might veto Clinton. Does Bush have the guts for it? I doubt it. The media would go ballistic if Bush dares to veto their boy. To be fair to Bush, I don’t know if any president could standup to the media venom that is sure to spew out after such a veto.

Why not Secretary General Clinton? Where’s the harm?

1. Secretary General Clinton stands the best chance of moving America closer to accepting a global government. That government will be totalitarian. Clinton would not be for it if it is anything less.

2. The UN’s Declaration of Human Rights is a blueprint for a global welfare state paid for with taxes levied on the wealth producers in First World countries. Clinton’s knowledge of how Washington works will go a long way towards instituting that welfare state.

3. Clinton is not alone in his betrayal. There are a lot of influential Beltway insiders who will help Clinton abolish America’s sovereignty. They include a few Republicans as well as a majority of elected Democrats.

4. Secretary General Clinton, working with President Hillary Clinton, has the political savvy to finally put some kind of an international tax like the Tobin Tax in place. Even Senator Hillary Clinton in a Democrat-controlled senate offers Secretary General Clinton limitless opportunities to advance the socialist agenda. Just think of the UN treaties they will bring up for ratification!

XXXXX​

DATED: 3/27/2007 6:04 AM Eastern Standard Time

I always maintained that Bill becoming secretary-general was a key component in the Clinton agenda while the Clintons were still in the White House. The Clinton world looked rosier than ever after Mrs. Clinton won a senate seat and then was reelected in 2006. The bloom began to fade from the rose when Ban Ki-Moon took over after Kofi Annan departed.

Until a year or two ago the MSM kept Clinton’s designs on the job a secret from the general public. Even when Clinton did allude to the job he spoke as though it was an intriguing possibility that he would be interested in if he wasn’t doing anything else. She never talked about it at all until now.

Over the years my opposites scoffed every time I warned that a President Hillary Clinton and a Secretary General Bill Clinton would kill America’s independence as sure as night follows day. Many said that he would never get the job because the General Assembly would not vote for him. Others said that China and Russia would oppose Clinton with a Security Council veto when, in fact, those governments would have welcomed him with open arms as would the General Assembly. Ask yourself why?

XXXXX​

DATED: July 18, 2008

The Clintons have to be as bitter as a tree full of lemons. The Clinton Administration salvaged socialism’s infrastructure so that Hillary could reap the benefits. Not only did Obama ease on in, he killed the dream of President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton leading mankind in socialism’s triumphant return to importance in global politics. Clinton may, or may not, have been the first black president, but Obama is definitely the first black Clinton and they don’t like it one little bit.

XXXXX​

DATED: November 24, 2008

President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Secretary General Bill Clinton will be more damaging to this country than President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton would have been because Obama gets unconditional support from blacks worldwide. With the MSM covering for them there’s no telling what that unholy trinity will accomplish by way of betraying this country.

XXXXX​

DATED: Feb. 1, 2013

Now that her lies are in the public domain, now that the scandals are behind her, most Americans will say: WHO CARES.

Unfortunately, Socialists care. The global government crowd cares. They all know that 2016 is the last chance for President Hillary Clinton and UN Secretary General Bill Clinton to rule the world together. Nobody in the government media will report that those two will finish off America as a sovereign nation if Hussein does not beat them to it.

XXXXX​

DATED: June 24, 2014

I have to admit that I never thought Taqiyya the Liar was in the running for the top UN job. I knew the Clintons had their eye on the Secretary General’s job for a long time. The Clinton dream has long been President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton saving the world together. Barack Taqiyya and the Clintons after the same job triggers a monumental struggle in the dark corners of the New World Order; a struggle the public will never hear about until it is too late.

President Hillary Clinton’s Choice: Bill or Barack | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

This article is dated today:

Word has it is that Obama wants to be Secretary-General of the United Nations. Ban Ki-Moon’s term concludes at the end of 2016 and it just so happens that Obama is available. (It would be interesting if Obama resigned on New Year’s Day 2017 and let Joe Biden become President for the final 20 days of his term.)

Obama Could Become President of the Whole World
Now there’s talk he’ll be the next UN Secretary-General — just what Israel needs to hear.
By Aaron Goldstein – 1.11.16

Obama Could Become President of the Whole World​

I posted many more messages about President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton, as well as a ton of messages about the danger of remaining in the anti-America United Nations. Think about this picture if you watch that piece of garbage deliver his final State of the Union address tomorrow night:

​

http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2016-01/195896_5_.jpg

Bill, Hillary, and Taqiyya the Liar wiping their asses with the Constitution is the only picture that would more effectively expose their hatred for this country.

Interesting. I haven't heard anything about BO wanting the UN position. I believe at this point in time the saving grace would be Russia who I don't think would ever consider an American for the position. China as well.
God I hope hillary doesn't win. I don't ever want to hear the names clinton or bush again, ever.

 

[BULLDOG]

As always, you worked really hard to present a long intricately woven example of what you truly believe. It's a shame that it's all conspiracy theories and rehashed fears forwarded by right wing radio.

 

[Flanders]

Serious reply: You think the UN means something?

To saveliberty: It means EVERYTHING to The New World Order crowd. If it did not they is no reason to have hid their treason and dirty dealings since 1945. See this thread for a bit more:

Ruling Class Globalists | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

I believe at this point in time the saving grace would be Russia who I don't think would ever consider an American for the position. China as well.

To baileyn45: Russia is the one country that would welcome an American traitor with open arms. Most especially Taqiyya the Liar:

​

Then there is this involving the Clintons and Taqiyya the Liar:

This is what Obama’s hand-picked Secretary of State was doing to feather the nest for her one-day presidential bid while she was in office: not just benefiting from but actually starting a cash flow to the Clinton Foundation—amid a controversial Russian Uranium Deal—she oversaw as SOS.

We may never have known about that deal were it not for Pravda online doing the cheer leading in a January 2013 article outlining the facts how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. When completed, the deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Vladimir Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

Hillary Clinton’s Clinton Foundation mega millions not born in the USA
By Judi McLeod
January 11, 2016

Hillary Clinton’s Clinton Foundation mega millions not born in the USA​

And nobody did more to hand America’s ICBM technology to China than did President Clinton when he authorized the sale of a Loral-made satellite to China. Justice Department prosecutors opposed the sale. The whole thing was a huge scandal in 1998. After nearly twenty years passed by it is all but forgotten as the Clintons close in on another bite out of the apple.

Never forget that United Nations is headquarters for ruling class globalists. See the thread I posted for saveliberty.

Every ruling class in every UN member state considers the American people a stumbling block to global government. They all know this:

1. Secretary General Clinton stands the best chance of moving America closer to accepting a global government. That government will be totalitarian. Clinton would not be for it if it is anything less.

If not Clinton than an American equally as reliable. See this brief video:

Walter Cronkite receives "Global Governance Award" from WFA

 

[saveliberty]

So...they waited 70 years already and most of them are dead. Pretty bad plan if you ask me.

 

[baileyn45]

Serious reply: You think the UN means something?

To saveliberty: It means EVERYTHING to The New World Order crowd. If it did not they is no reason to have hid their treason and dirty dealings since 1945. See this thread for a bit more:

Ruling Class Globalists | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

I believe at this point in time the saving grace would be Russia who I don't think would ever consider an American for the position. China as well.

To baileyn45: Russia is the one country that would welcome an American traitor with open arms. Most especially Taqiyya the Liar:

​

Then there is this involving the Clintons and Taqiyya the Liar:

This is what Obama’s hand-picked Secretary of State was doing to feather the nest for her one-day presidential bid while she was in office: not just benefiting from but actually starting a cash flow to the Clinton Foundation—amid a controversial Russian Uranium Deal—she oversaw as SOS.

We may never have known about that deal were it not for Pravda online doing the cheer leading in a January 2013 article outlining the facts how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. When completed, the deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Vladimir Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

Hillary Clinton’s Clinton Foundation mega millions not born in the USA
By Judi McLeod
January 11, 2016

Hillary Clinton’s Clinton Foundation mega millions not born in the USA​

And nobody did more to hand America’s ICBM technology to China than did President Clinton when he authorized the sale of a Loral-made satellite to China. Justice Department prosecutors opposed the sale. The whole thing was a huge scandal in 1998. After nearly twenty years passed by it is all but forgotten as the Clintons close in on another bite out of the apple.

Never forget that United Nations is headquarters for ruling class globalists. See the thread I posted for saveliberty.

Every ruling class in every UN member state considers the American people a stumbling block to global government. They all know this:

1. Secretary General Clinton stands the best chance of moving America closer to accepting a global government. That government will be totalitarian. Clinton would not be for it if it is anything less.

If not Clinton than an American equally as reliable. See this brief video:

Walter Cronkite receives "Global Governance Award" from WFA

I don't know. I think Putin would balk at an American at the top of the UN. He seems determined to go his own way and throw a wrench into the neocon plans. An american at the top would most certainly put him in the second row and I don't think Putin sees Russia not being on the same level with the US. I believe he would only accept a third party, at least giving the appearance of parity with us.

 

[baileyn45]

So...they waited 70 years already and most of them are dead. Pretty bad plan if you ask me.

Nah they're still alive inhabiting different bodies, you know alien dna and all.

 

[baileyn45]

Every ruling class in every UN member state considers the American people a stumbling block to global government. They all know this:

Nice to know we're good for something!

 

[Flanders]

I don't know. I think Putin would balk at an American at the top of the UN. He seems determined to go his own way and throw a wrench into the neocon plans. An american at the top would most certainly put him in the second row and I don't think Putin sees Russia not being on the same level with the US. I believe he would only accept a third party, at least giving the appearance of parity with us.

To baileyn45: Russia’s veto on the Security Council already gives Putin everything he wants. Ditto China.

 

[saveliberty]

The only serious question here is why has this been moved to the conspiracy theory section yet?

 

[Flanders]

The only serious question here is why has this been moved to the conspiracy theory section yet?

To saveliberty: Analyzing where the United Nations is trying to go comes under the heading of protected political speech —— not conspiracy theory. Americans interpreting the words and actions of government officials are simply trying to determine where they are heading. According to the federal government such recalcitrance must stop because the global government crowd dare not defend, cannot defend, their treasonous agenda under the harsh light of free speech. Bottom line: When the order of business is indefensible all opposition must be silenced.

If you do not agree you can always define the conspiracy as you see it, or are you another asshole shouting conspiracy theory when they have nothing to say?

In recent years, everything Democrats objected to became a conspiracy theory. Every criticism of the welfare state, and government officials, would be outlawed as conspiracy theories if the federal government has its way. Read this article and you will see that old-fashioned censorship is not good enough to silence free speech —— it has to be criminalized:

Obama czar proposed government ‘infiltrate’ social network sites
Sunstein wants agents to 'undermine' talk in chat rooms, message boards
by Aaron Klein

Obama czar proposed government ‘infiltrate’ social network sites​

To message board liberals, every conservative opinion, every interpretation, every prediction, amounts to conspiracy theorizing. Then-First Lady Hillary Clinton’s first attack on free speech set today’s conspiracy crapola in motion:

​

Look how far the vast right-wing has come since 1998. I fully expect Hillary to accuse the FBI of engaging in a conspiracy against her. In less than one generation every objection that offends a Democrat became a conspiracy theory!

Finally, I always called it doublespeak, while Bill O’Reilly calls it “re-branding.” His observation primarily addresses propaganda while I am concerned with free speech. (Government liars also have free speech.) Listen to Charles Krauthammer explain how Democrats re-brand everything:

Bill O'Reilly: The O'Reilly Factor - Monday, January 11, 2016

My point. It is easier to pooh-pooh anything on a message board by calling it a conspiracy theory than it is to pooh-pooh United Nations propaganda on television 24-7.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"A Serious Question For A Serious Issue"

There's nothing "serious" about this partisan lunacy.

 

[Flanders]

Think about this picture if you watch that piece of garbage deliver his final State of the Union address

​

There's nothing "serious" about this partisan lunacy.

To C_Clayton_Jones: How about this?:

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/bg011216dAPR20160111104523.jpg

 

[Granny]

I think the bottom line is that no other organization in the world is more proof positive that 100% peace will never be anything other than a pipe dream than is the UN. It's corrupt to the core, nobody gets along with everybody, there are deep-seated issues of hatred among many nations and each member holds the best interests of the country they represent foremost in any decision making. The UN should just close its doors and send everybody back to wherever they came from. Failing that, maybe US withdrawal could force closure of the doors ... we're the biggest financial supporter of the whole organization ... and we get the least thanks from all these countries we've helped rebuild after wars, funds we've donated to help feed, clothe, provide medical assistance to, or any disaster relief we've provided.

 

[Flanders]

I think the bottom line is that no other organization in the world is more proof positive that 100% peace will never be anything other than a pipe dream than is the UN. It's corrupt to the core, nobody gets along with everybody, there are deep-seated issues of hatred among many nations and each member holds the best interests of the country they represent foremost in any decision making. The UN should just close its doors and send everybody back to wherever they came from. Failing that, maybe US withdrawal could force closure of the doors ... we're the biggest financial supporter of the whole organization ... and we get the least thanks from all these countries we've helped rebuild after wars, funds we've donated to help feed, clothe, provide medical assistance to, or any disaster relief we've provided.

To Granny: You are right about everything. Sad to say, the global government crowd is less than one percent of the population, but they have so much political power, and wealth, there is not a chance H.R. 75 will ever get a vote in Congress. Even if it made it to a vote in the House, I am convinced there are enough traitors in the US Senate to defeat it.

Incidentally, there is no doubt every Democrat opposes withdrawing from the United Nations, but did any of the probable Republican candidates ever say how they stand?

Text of H.R. 75 (113th): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2013 (Introduced version) - GovTrack.us

NOTE: H.R. 75 succeeded H.R. 1146.

I believe that Ron Paul authored H.R. 1146 in 1997 and reintroduced it in every new Congress before he retired. When he ran for the presidency he never mentioned it.

Under Bush the Younger, Republicans had the presidency, and both chambers of Congress, yet H.R. 1146 could not get out of committee. That should tell you how much control the United Nations exercises over our wonderful legislators.

 

[Flanders]

I fully expect Hillary to accuse the FBI of engaging in a conspiracy against her.

Take your pick on this one should the FBI nail her: ​

When Hillary Clinton famously blamed her husband’s bimbo eruption troubles on a “vast right wing conspiracy,” she revealed, via projection, her own approach to getting things done. Covertly pulling strings behind the scenes, mobilizing forces to act while maintaining personal deniability to foment events and determine outcomes is the very definition of conspiracy, and now also is revealed to be the way Hillary’s staff has been conditioned to think about action for the SecState in the latest trove of Hillary emails.

XXXXX​

Pickering insists that there must be no U.S. fingerprints on the demonstrations – the conspiracy must be protected:

XXXXX​

Can we call this a “vast anti-Israel conspiracy”?​

January 12, 2016
Emails reveal Hillary vetted plans to undermine Israel with covert ops
By Thomas Lifson

Blog: Emails reveal Hillary vetted plans to undermine Israel with covert ops​

1. The wheel comes around.

2. Chickens coming home to roost.

3. Déjà vu all over again.

4. The shoe is on the other foot.

5. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

6. No bad deed goes unpunished.

7. Poetic justice has an elephant’s memory.

 

[Flanders]

http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2016-01/195896_5_.jpg

Thank you Steve:

“He took his oath of office twice on how to protect and preserve the Constitution of the United States and he’s done everything but even when he knew he was wrong.”​

Breaking: Rep. Steve King Walks Out on Obama SOTU – Didn’t Want to be ‘Lectured to’
Jim Hoft
Jan 12th, 2016 10:23 pm​

See the video:

Breaking: Rep. Steve King Walks Out on Obama SOTU - Didn't Want to be 'Lectured to' - The Gateway Pundit

 

[BULLDOG]

http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2016-01/195896_5_.jpg

Thank you Steve:

“He took his oath of office twice on how to protect and preserve the Constitution of the United States and he’s done everything but even when he knew he was wrong.”​

Breaking: Rep. Steve King Walks Out on Obama SOTU – Didn’t Want to be ‘Lectured to’
Jim Hoft
Jan 12th, 2016 10:23 pm​

See the video:

Breaking: Rep. Steve King Walks Out on Obama SOTU - Didn't Want to be 'Lectured to' - The Gateway Pundit

Steve King needs to realize that childish behavior sometimes deserves a lecture. In his case, he really should listen.

 

[Flanders]

The Democrat that asked this question gave Clinton a worthless negotiating chip:

Democrat front-runner Hillary Clinton has a “great idea” that will make conservatives across America shudder if she becomes president: Nominate President Obama to the Supreme Court.

At a campaign rally in Decorah, Iowa, Tuesday, Clinton was asked about the possibility of nominating the 44th president to the high court.

“The next president will probably appoint several members of the Supreme Court. Would you consider appointing Obama?” a man asked.

“Wow, what a great idea!” she declared as her face lit up and her mouth dropped wide open. “Nobody has ever suggested that to me. Wow! I love that! Wow!”

Clinton continued, “He may have a few other things to do. But, I’ll tell ya, that’s a great idea. … I would certainly take that under advisement. He’s brilliant. And he can set forth an argument. And he was a law professor, so he’s got all the credentials.”​

Hillary: Justice Obama 'a great idea'
Posted By Chelsea Schilling On 01/26/2016 @ 7:48 pm

Hillary: Justice Obama ‘a great idea’​

He sure is brilliant —— at abolishing the Constitution.

If Hillary wants Taqiyya the Liar to openly endorse her for the nomination, as well as nobble AG Loretta Lynch, she has to offer more than a judgeship albeit a spot on the Supreme Court. The Liar sees more than a judgeship in his future.

Word has it is that Obama wants to be Secretary-General of the United Nations. Ban Ki-Moon’s term concludes at the end of 2016 and it just so happens that Obama is available. (It would be interesting if Obama resigned on New Year’s Day 2017 and let Joe Biden become President for the final 20 days of his term.)

I’m pretty sure that the sewer rat will tell her to shove the judgeship. Why take a hot dog when he can get a seven course meal? The question is this: Will Hillary dump THE DREAM and give the UN job to the sewer rat?

Since that first message on the issue, I posted many more about the Clinton dream; President Hillary Clinton and Secretary General Bill Clinton saving the world together.

Can you imagine two accomplished liars negotiating against each other?

Hillary opens with a judgeship knowing the odds of a Republican senate confirming him are slim and zero, and Slim just left town. Republicans putting Taqiyya the Liar on the Supreme Court would be akin to making Hannibal Lecter head chef in a concentration camp.

The sewer rat counters by demanding the UN job in the unlikely event she becomes president. She comes back with a Security Council veto. He points out she dare not. She cackles and replies with an evil glint in her eye “My skirts are clean if one of the other permanent members on the security council vetoes you.” And around and around they go.

Frankly, I think it is a Mexican Standoff. One guy is on his way out the door, while the other guy cannot find the door in.

Jokes notwithstanding, Democrats had better give some serious thought to unintended consequences if another Democrat liar replaces the current liar. Instead of listening to media mouths never-ending reporting polling results, every American should be looking at continuing attacks coming from the United Nations crowd, and the type of people the Senate has been confirming in recent decades. John Kerry —— 97 to 0 —— is a glaring example of unintended consequences. Did even one of the 97 know that Kerry was a United Nations stooge in all of the years he was in Congress! I knew it from his public statements. I shudder thinking what I would have known about him had I been in the Senate all of those years.