A question?

[RetiredGySgt]

If you were presented with the smoking wreckage of the Pentagon, within the wreckage you found the remains of crew and passengers of a jet liner along with parts and pieces of said Jet Liner, and were told someone had called and reported the flight had been hijacked. Upon further investigation you discovered the remains of 4 known terrorists in the wreckage.

Would you say " There is no conclusive evidence that the flight was hijacked"?

 

[candycorn]

If you were presented with the smoking wreckage of the Pentagon, within the wreckage you found the remains of crew and passengers of a jet liner along with parts and pieces of said Jet Liner, and were told someone had called and reported the flight had been hijacked. Upon further investigation you discovered the remains of 4 known terrorists in the wreckage.

Would you say " There is no conclusive evidence that the flight was hijacked"?

No. I would not say that. However,

I would look at the wreckage to make sure it was a 757. They did that.
I would collect the remains and compare them to baseline DNA. They did that.
I would segregate the remains of the hijackers from the others on the plane. They did that.
I would check the veracity of the calls. They did that.

The investigation, from all points of view, was complete.

So, the statement "There is no conclusive evidence that the flight was hijacked" is the utterance of somebody either of very low IQ, starved for media attention, or someone not in control of their mind.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Clearly, there was a gas leak. This is why we don't l;et people smoke within 20 feet of the windows.

 

[Toro]

No.

I would disregard all that evidence, and pretty obvious questions such as "What happened to all the people that were on the plane that colleagues, friends and loved ones said good-bye to mere minutes before?" and "Where did the plane go?," the hundreds of eye witnesses, and instead concoct a theory about a missile that nobody saw, that no radar picked up, and is completely inconsistent with the narrative of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists (why have planes slam into the WTC but a missile into the Pentagon?)

That seems perfectly reasonable to me.

 

[random3434]

I would post youtube video after youtube video to prove my point.

 

[Fizz]

no. i would try to distract people by showing people a hole full of airplane parts and claiming it was empty.

 

[rdean]

If you were presented with the smoking wreckage of the Pentagon, within the wreckage you found the remains of crew and passengers of a jet liner along with parts and pieces of said Jet Liner, and were told someone had called and reported the flight had been hijacked. Upon further investigation you discovered the remains of 4 known terrorists in the wreckage.

Would you say " There is no conclusive evidence that the flight was hijacked"?

"IF"

That game is the favorite past time of Republicans. The game of "If". Usually, as part of the game, they offer an "either/or" answer and you are supposed to "pick one" and then that "answer" should become part of US foreign policy. You see, the great thing about "either/or" answers is they are always slanted so one answer is the only one that is really acceptable.

If a woman, at 8 months went in to get an abortion, should she be allowed, "yes or no"?

Should Obama be allowed to let terrorists go free on the streets of New York or should he keep them in prison because otherwise, they will kill you daughter? "Free or imprison"?

So OK, I'll play.

Even though, in this day and age, no plane would be allowed to get that close to the Pentagon and even though the first hijackers only used box cutters and even though you are thoroughly searched when you get on a plane and aren't even allowed to carry fingernail clippers and even though a plane crash into a building wouldn't leave anyone recognizable and even though id check wouldn't let "known terrorists" as far as the boarding line and even though American citizens are so fed up with anyone acting the least bit unruly and when someone does, they pile on the person "acting up", then the answer is "Yes" they probably were terrorists. How did I do? Did I give the right answer?

Now do you see why Republicans hate me? I consider it a badge of honor.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If you were presented with the smoking wreckage of the Pentagon, within the wreckage you found the remains of crew and passengers of a jet liner along with parts and pieces of said Jet Liner, and were told someone had called and reported the flight had been hijacked. Upon further investigation you discovered the remains of 4 known terrorists in the wreckage.

Would you say " There is no conclusive evidence that the flight was hijacked"?

"IF"

That game is the favorite past time of Republicans. The game of "If". Usually, as part of the game, they offer an "either/or" answer and you are supposed to "pick one" and then that "answer" should become part of US foreign policy. You see, the great thing about "either/or" answers is they are always slanted so one answer is the only one that is really acceptable.

If a woman, at 8 months went in to get an abortion, should she be allowed, "yes or no"?

Should Obama be allowed to let terrorists go free on the streets of New York or should he keep them in prison because otherwise, they will kill you daughter? "Free or imprison"?

So OK, I'll play.

Even though, in this day and age, no plane would be allowed to get that close to the Pentagon and even though the first hijackers only used box cutters and even though you are thoroughly searched when you get on a plane and aren't even allowed to carry fingernail clippers and even though a plane crash into a building wouldn't leave anyone recognizable and even though id check wouldn't let "known terrorists" as far as the boarding line and even though American citizens are so fed up with anyone acting the least bit unruly and when someone does, they pile on the person "acting up", then the answer is "Yes" they probably were terrorists. How did I do? Did I give the right answer?

Now do you see why Republicans hate me? I consider it a badge of honor.

Look we have another retarded troofer. Or someone that is so politically biased that they will argue the opposite just to be opposite.

 

[Liability]

If you were presented with the smoking wreckage of the Pentagon, within the wreckage you found the remains of crew and passengers of a jet liner along with parts and pieces of said Jet Liner, and were told someone had called and reported the flight had been hijacked. Upon further investigation you discovered the remains of 4 known terrorists in the wreckage.

Would you say " There is no conclusive evidence that the flight was hijacked"?

It was a self-inflicted missle strike!

(Sorry, I was just channeling id-eots there for a second!)

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If you were presented with the smoking wreckage of the Pentagon, within the wreckage you found the remains of crew and passengers of a jet liner along with parts and pieces of said Jet Liner, and were told someone had called and reported the flight had been hijacked. Upon further investigation you discovered the remains of 4 known terrorists in the wreckage.

Would you say " There is no conclusive evidence that the flight was hijacked"?

"IF"

That game is the favorite past time of Republicans. The game of "If". Usually, as part of the game, they offer an "either/or" answer and you are supposed to "pick one" and then that "answer" should become part of US foreign policy. You see, the great thing about "either/or" answers is they are always slanted so one answer is the only one that is really acceptable.

If a woman, at 8 months went in to get an abortion, should she be allowed, "yes or no"?

Should Obama be allowed to let terrorists go free on the streets of New York or should he keep them in prison because otherwise, they will kill you daughter? "Free or imprison"?

So OK, I'll play.

Even though, in this day and age, no plane would be allowed to get that close to the Pentagon

Unbelievable, Exactly HOW does the US stop a plane from reaching the Pentagon in this day and age?

and even though the first hijackers only used box cutters and even though you are thoroughly searched when you get on a plane and aren't even allowed to carry fingernail clippers and even though a plane crash into a building wouldn't leave anyone recognizable and even though id check wouldn't let "known terrorists" as far as the boarding line and even though American citizens are so fed up with anyone acting the least bit unruly and when someone does, they pile on the person "acting up", then the answer is "Yes" they probably were terrorists. How did I do? Did I give the right answer?

Now do you see why Republicans hate me? I consider it a badge of honor.

The idea that before 9/11 anyone actually searched people that thoroughly or actually had lists of terrorists on file is hilarious.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Even though, in this day and age, no plane would be allowed to get that close to the Pentagon and even though the first hijackers only used box cutters and even though you are thoroughly searched when you get on a plane and aren't even allowed to carry fingernail clippers and...

do you know when those policies went into effect?

 

[rdean]

Even though, in this day and age, no plane would be allowed to get that close to the Pentagon and even though the first hijackers only used box cutters and even though you are thoroughly searched when you get on a plane and aren't even allowed to carry fingernail clippers and...

do you know when those policies went into effect?

I know that I just went to Reno for Thanksgiving and they made me take off my shoes and belt and empty my pockets. They went nuts over the magnifying glass in my case because they couldn't tell what it was (for reading - gettin old you see), the guy in front of me, they took his nail clippers. AND they randomly pulled people out of line for an ID check. So I would suspect that they are in place, when, I suspect some time after 9/11.

 

[rdean]

If you were presented with the smoking wreckage of the Pentagon, within the wreckage you found the remains of crew and passengers of a jet liner along with parts and pieces of said Jet Liner, and were told someone had called and reported the flight had been hijacked. Upon further investigation you discovered the remains of 4 known terrorists in the wreckage.

Would you say " There is no conclusive evidence that the flight was hijacked"?

"IF"

That game is the favorite past time of Republicans. The game of "If". Usually, as part of the game, they offer an "either/or" answer and you are supposed to "pick one" and then that "answer" should become part of US foreign policy. You see, the great thing about "either/or" answers is they are always slanted so one answer is the only one that is really acceptable.

If a woman, at 8 months went in to get an abortion, should she be allowed, "yes or no"?

Should Obama be allowed to let terrorists go free on the streets of New York or should he keep them in prison because otherwise, they will kill you daughter? "Free or imprison"?

So OK, I'll play.

Even though, in this day and age, no plane would be allowed to get that close to the Pentagon

Unbelievable, Exactly HOW does the US stop a plane from reaching the Pentagon in this day and age?

and even though the first hijackers only used box cutters and even though you are thoroughly searched when you get on a plane and aren't even allowed to carry fingernail clippers and even though a plane crash into a building wouldn't leave anyone recognizable and even though id check wouldn't let "known terrorists" as far as the boarding line and even though American citizens are so fed up with anyone acting the least bit unruly and when someone does, they pile on the person "acting up", then the answer is "Yes" they probably were terrorists. How did I do? Did I give the right answer?

Now do you see why Republicans hate me? I consider it a badge of honor.

The idea that before 9/11 anyone actually searched people that thoroughly or actually had lists of terrorists on file is hilarious.

I didn't see where he mentioned 9/11 in his question. Would you highlight it please?

 

[Zoom-boing]

Even though, in this day and age, no plane would be allowed to get that close to the Pentagon and even though the first hijackers only used box cutters and even though you are thoroughly searched when you get on a plane and aren't even allowed to carry fingernail clippers and even though a plane crash into a building wouldn't leave anyone recognizable and even though id check wouldn't let "known terrorists" as far as the boarding line and even though American citizens are so fed up with anyone acting the least bit unruly and when someone does, they pile on the person "acting up", then the answer is "Yes" they probably were terrorists. How did I do? Did I give the right answer?

Now do you see why Republicans hate me? I consider it a badge of honor.

You can't make this shit up. Thanks for the laugh.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

"IF"

That game is the favorite past time of Republicans. The game of "If". Usually, as part of the game, they offer an "either/or" answer and you are supposed to "pick one" and then that "answer" should become part of US foreign policy. You see, the great thing about "either/or" answers is they are always slanted so one answer is the only one that is really acceptable.

If a woman, at 8 months went in to get an abortion, should she be allowed, "yes or no"?

Should Obama be allowed to let terrorists go free on the streets of New York or should he keep them in prison because otherwise, they will kill you daughter? "Free or imprison"?

So OK, I'll play.

Even though, in this day and age, no plane would be allowed to get that close to the Pentagon and even though the first hijackers only used box cutters and even though you are thoroughly searched when you get on a plane and aren't even allowed to carry fingernail clippers and even though a plane crash into a building wouldn't leave anyone recognizable and even though id check wouldn't let "known terrorists" as far as the boarding line and even though American citizens are so fed up with anyone acting the least bit unruly and when someone does, they pile on the person "acting up", then the answer is "Yes" they probably were terrorists. How did I do? Did I give the right answer?

Now do you see why Republicans hate me? I consider it a badge of honor.

The idea that before 9/11 anyone actually searched people that thoroughly or actually had lists of terrorists on file is hilarious.

I didn't see where he mentioned 9/11 in his question. Would you highlight it please?

Are you more then 9 years old? When did a plane hit the Pentagon?

 

[Zoom-boing]

The idea that before 9/11 anyone actually searched people that thoroughly or actually had lists of terrorists on file is hilarious.

I didn't see where he mentioned 9/11 in his question. Would you highlight it please?

Are you more then 9 years old? When did a plane hit the Pentagon?

Shhhh, he's just trying to figure a way out of the corner he's painted himself into.

 

[xotoxi]

If you were presented with the smoking wreckage of the Pentagon, within the wreckage you found the remains of crew and passengers of a jet liner along with parts and pieces of said Jet Liner, and were told someone had called and reported the flight had been hijacked. Upon further investigation you discovered the remains of 4 known terrorists in the wreckage.

Would you say " There is no conclusive evidence that the flight was hijacked"?

If all the above is true, I would have to conclude that a missle painted like the airplane in question and containing assorted parts of said plane hit the Pentagon, and then members of a rogue element drove to the wreckage site and carefully placed burnt bodies and body parts of the would be passengers (who were all executed elsewhere earlier that morning) all around the wreckage site.

That would be the only logical explanation.

 

[Samson]

I would look at the wreckage to make sure it was a 757. They did that.
I would collect the remains and compare them to baseline DNA. They did that.
I would segregate the remains of the hijackers from the others on the plane. They did that.
I would check the veracity of the calls. They did that.

The investigation, from all points of view, was complete.

"They? Them?"

BAH!

YOU, candycorn, YOU personnally should have looked at the wreckage to make sure it was a 757, collected the remains and compare them to baseline DNA, segregated the remains of the hijackers from the others on the plane, and checked the veracity of the calls!!

SHEEZE, you'll believe ANYTHING!!!!

 

[rdean]

I didn't see where he mentioned 9/11 in his question. Would you highlight it please?

Are you more then 9 years old? When did a plane hit the Pentagon?

Shhhh, he's just trying to figure a way out of the corner he's painted himself into.

How many corners on a Pentagon?

I love the way Republicans number count.

Two
Ten
Eleven

Eyes
Fingers
Toes

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Are you more then 9 years old? When did a plane hit the Pentagon?

Shhhh, he's just trying to figure a way out of the corner he's painted himself into.

How many corners on a Pentagon?

I love the way Republicans number count.

Two
Ten
Eleven

Eyes
Fingers
Toes

You are aware, I hope, that not just Republicans believe that on 9/11 2001 flight 77 slammed into the Pentagon? In fact the only people that don't believe that are delusional loons.