A Masturbatory ‘Homage’ to My Family

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
17,946
33,990
2,290
Such an atrocious piece of... something. And completely unnecessary as well.



By now, I’m sure you’ve seen it. The new Boston sculpture “honoring” Dr. Martin Luther King and his wife, Coretta Scott King, looks more like a pair of hands hugging a beefy penis than a special moment shared by the iconic couple. Created by the organization Embrace Boston, the sculpture has inspired mad jokes on Twitter, and rightly so. But for my family, it’s rather insulting. You see, Coretta was my first cousin, my grandfather’s niece, and the daughter of my great uncle Obediah Scott.

Martin married up. Coretta came from a distinguished family, with a significant legacy in her own right. There is a reason she kept the Scott name. We were a black family that owned land, lots of it. Martin knew what he was doing when he pursued her, signaling intentions to marry from the outset. After his assassination, Coretta created a legacy of her own, fighting for health-care workers and against Apartheid in South Africa.

“The Boston debacle … exposes the insidiousness of astroturfed woke movements.”
Ten million dollars were wasted to create a masturbatory metal homage to my legendary family members—one of the all-time greatest American families. Still, the Boston debacle could be a blessing in disguise, by exposing the insidiousness of astroturfed woke movements that have come to dominate black America: How could anyone fail to see that this was a major dick move (pun intended) that brings very few, if any, tangible benefits to struggling black families?

“Consider this our Declaration of Interdependence,” declares the Embrace Boston website. What does that even mean? Black families in America who need help don’t care for more woke slogans. They need jobs that pay the bills and keep up with food and energy costs that are rising faster than ever before for most of us. Building expensive, stupid new statues with no faces on them—and tearing down others for no good reason—are part of the same performative altruism and purity pageants that are mainstays of the woke left.

So now Boston has a big bronze penis statue that’s supposed to represent black love at its purest and most devotional. This is no accident. The woke algorithm is racist and classist. Therefore, its programming will always produce things that harm black and poor people. This sculpture is an especially egregious example of the woke machine’s callousness and vanity. Hopefully, it will show more black people that these progressives just aren’t in this for our benefit.


 
And ...

2e219b35786dfa140402e5209e4ef84beb333da8-1000x667.jpg
 
Such an atrocious piece of... something. And completely unnecessary as well.


By now, I’m sure you’ve seen it. The new Boston sculpture “honoring” Dr. Martin Luther King and his wife, Coretta Scott King, looks more like a pair of hands hugging a beefy penis than a special moment shared by the iconic couple. Created by the organization Embrace Boston, the sculpture has inspired mad jokes on Twitter, and rightly so. But for my family, it’s rather insulting. You see, Coretta was my first cousin, my grandfather’s niece, and the daughter of my great uncle Obediah Scott.
Martin married up. Coretta came from a distinguished family, with a significant legacy in her own right. There is a reason she kept the Scott name. We were a black family that owned land, lots of it. Martin knew what he was doing when he pursued her, signaling intentions to marry from the outset. After his assassination, Coretta created a legacy of her own, fighting for health-care workers and against Apartheid in South Africa.
“The Boston debacle … exposes the insidiousness of astroturfed woke movements.”
Ten million dollars were wasted to create a masturbatory metal homage to my legendary family members—one of the all-time greatest American families. Still, the Boston debacle could be a blessing in disguise, by exposing the insidiousness of astroturfed woke movements that have come to dominate black America: How could anyone fail to see that this was a major dick move (pun intended) that brings very few, if any, tangible benefits to struggling black families?
“Consider this our Declaration of Interdependence,” declares the Embrace Boston website. What does that even mean? Black families in America who need help don’t care for more woke slogans. They need jobs that pay the bills and keep up with food and energy costs that are rising faster than ever before for most of us. Building expensive, stupid new statues with no faces on them—and tearing down others for no good reason—are part of the same performative altruism and purity pageants that are mainstays of the woke left.
So now Boston has a big bronze penis statue that’s supposed to represent black love at its purest and most devotional. This is no accident. The woke algorithm is racist and classist. Therefore, its programming will always produce things that harm black and poor people. This sculpture is an especially egregious example of the woke machine’s callousness and vanity. Hopefully, it will show more black people that these progressives just aren’t in this for our benefit.


We saw it from a weird angle on TV, today. PJ said "Is that some couple having oral sex"?
 
Aw ... that's cute. But, you know better than that.

What offends YOU doesn't matter ... it's only what offends THEM.

No, certain statues offended the left, they demanded they be removed and they were

Fair is fair...a statue of a womanizing so called minister offends me. It has to go

Stick it in a warehouse or museum. ....sound familiar?
 
I guess you'll be quite neutral about things like this, then.

I don't find the physical buildings and gates of Auschwitz offensive. I find what went on there to be quite offensive. What one group of humans did to another, over their "high-minded" ideals was monstrous in the extreme. The buildings and gates where it took place are bricks and mortar. Bricks and mortar can be used to build a museum or a murder factory. The bricks have so say and have no ideals.

Iconoclasts like The Taliban or the Byzantines felt anger and violence over depictions of people and ideas that they didn't like or understand. They destroyed works and even killed people over these depictions.

I'd like to think that any thinking person can tell the difference between an offensive act and a piece of art.

But, perhaps they can't always do that.

P.S. I would find it offensive if anyone advocated the destruction of the remaining buildings of Auschwitz. I believe that in it's current capacity as a vivid reminder of the cruelty that occurred there is redeeming the site that was once used most heinously.

Tearing it down would be an effort to erase the crimes that occurred there and, subsequently, prepare the world for a repetition.
 
P.S. I would find it offensive if anyone advocated the destruction of the remaining buildings of Auschwitz. I believe that in it's current capacity as a vivid reminder of the cruelty that occurred there is redeeming the site that was once used most heinously.
So, you'd be offended by a lack of inanimate objects.

Kinky...
 

Forum List

Back
Top