90 cities hit record high temperature

Chris

Gold Member
May 30, 2008
23,154
1,967
205
More than 90 record-high temperatures were recorded in the Midwest and Great Lakes yesterday.

And perhaps an even better record came for the residents of Minneapolis-St. Paul in Minnesota - for only the third time in recorded history there was no snow measured during the month of March. (Records date back to 1859).

Rochester, Minnesota, shattered its old record high of 71 degrees when the temperature soared to 83 degrees yesterday. Chicago also recorded a record high temperature for April 1 of 83.

More than 90 record-high temperatures broken – This Just In - CNN.com Blogs
 
and it doesn't mean a Goddamned thing, you piece of shit partisan hack.
 
Hey Global Warming is back. Ya know maybe he was just on vacation, the libs have been riding him pretty hard for a long time.

Probably down in Rio where he would fit in without being noticed.
 
Actually I'm relieved because it sort of cancels out all the record cold reported in Europe, Cuba, Alaska, Belize, the U.S. midwest and Gulf coast, New Mexico, Cuba, and other points in the Carribbean over the last few months.

It is good to be reassured that we probably aren't about to be overwhelmed by another ice age quite yet.
 
If the record cold and snow doesn't mean global cooling then one day of heat does not equal global warming.

And further the free world has been monitoring weather for a very VERY short time in the history of civilization, and the ability to accurately read the ancient records are tentative at best and of late been more like trying to follow a moving crap game.

It is a given that on any given day there will be record heat AND record cold reported somewhere on the planet and we can expect that trend to continue for some time into the future until we have a lot more history of accurately reporting temperatures.
 
The Sun is at its lowest level of activity in 80 years, and yet we have record high temperatures.

Why?
 
The Sun is at its lowest level of activity in 80 years, and yet we have record high temperatures.

Why?

Record high temperatures in some place. Record cold temperatures in others. The climate is and has never been static. The Earth will be warming or cooling on any given day. The CO2 levels have continued to rise unabated for the last several years while median Earth temperatures have leveled off or even cooled at bit.

Why?
 
I wonder what the goal really is. If the stated goal is reached, of greatly reducing CO2 in the atmosphere, this is bad for plant life. Let's say what -- 200ppm is acceptable? Lower than that?

Or, is it simply just wanting to TAX pollution, rather than reduce it?

Cap and trade hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried, not if you're talking reduction of carbon. What it has done is the actual goal, global redistribution of wealth.

When will the sycophants stop pretending it's about saving the earth, and just be straight?
 
When will the sycophants stop pretending it's about saving the earth, and just be straight?

They'll be straight once they have us all the way over the designated barrel with no way out.

Of course it isn't about global warming. If anthropogenic CO2 was the problem and they truly believed that, they would be demanding rigid reductions from everybody with no exceptions. Instead they are trading it around with no serious effort to reduce overall emissions at all.

So of course its all about control, especailly putting the giants like the USA under world government authority where it can be better exploited and controlled. Unfortunately, we seem to have leadership who is quite eager to aid and abet that outcome.
 
You mean to tell me that the weather is unpredictable? WFT!!!?? Somebody better tell those TV weather people!!!

Not only is weather unpredictable, but climate is 100% predictable that at any given time the Earth will be warming or cooling. We do have evidence that this has happened again and again and again.
 
More than 90 record-high temperatures were recorded in the Midwest and Great Lakes yesterday.

And perhaps an even better record came for the residents of Minneapolis-St. Paul in Minnesota - for only the third time in recorded history there was no snow measured during the month of March. (Records date back to 1859).

Rochester, Minnesota, shattered its old record high of 71 degrees when the temperature soared to 83 degrees yesterday. Chicago also recorded a record high temperature for April 1 of 83.

More than 90 record-high temperatures broken – This Just In - CNN.com Blogs


1) Learn the difference between climate and weather before making another idiotic thread like this.

2) Eat a dick, faggot ......
 
I wonder what the goal really is. If the stated goal is reached, of greatly reducing CO2 in the atmosphere, this is bad for plant life. Let's say what -- 200ppm is acceptable? Lower than that?

Or, is it simply just wanting to TAX pollution, rather than reduce it?

Cap and trade hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried, not if you're talking reduction of carbon. What it has done is the actual goal, global redistribution of wealth.

When will the sycophants stop pretending it's about saving the earth, and just be straight?

Well, Midnight old sot, if you do not know the levels of GHGs for the interglacial and glacial periods, then you have failed to do even the slightest research.

Cap and trade worked very well on sulphate emissions. They can work equally well for GHG emissions. The problem is that they are too slow in working.

When will you get a brain, Midnight?:lol:
 
One of the predictions of climate change is weather swings that are wider and wilder, with an overall warming trend.

Of course, we have seen no unuassal weather at all this winter and spring, have we.
 
I wonder what the goal really is. If the stated goal is reached, of greatly reducing CO2 in the atmosphere, this is bad for plant life. Let's say what -- 200ppm is acceptable? Lower than that?

Or, is it simply just wanting to TAX pollution, rather than reduce it?

Cap and trade hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried, not if you're talking reduction of carbon. What it has done is the actual goal, global redistribution of wealth.

When will the sycophants stop pretending it's about saving the earth, and just be straight?

Well, Midnight old sot, if you do not know the levels of GHGs for the interglacial and glacial periods, then you have failed to do even the slightest research.

Cap and trade worked very well on sulphate emissions. They can work equally well for GHG emissions. The problem is that they are too slow in working.

When will you get a brain, Midnight?:lol:
Tells us all how greatly reduced CO2 is going to HELP the planet.

I'll wait.
 
More than 90 record-high temperatures were recorded in the Midwest and Great Lakes yesterday.

And perhaps an even better record came for the residents of Minneapolis-St. Paul in Minnesota - for only the third time in recorded history there was no snow measured during the month of March. (Records date back to 1859).

Rochester, Minnesota, shattered its old record high of 71 degrees when the temperature soared to 83 degrees yesterday. Chicago also recorded a record high temperature for April 1 of 83.

More than 90 record-high temperatures broken – This Just In - CNN.com Blogs

you're confusing weather with climate, kirky.
tsk, tsk
 
I wonder what the goal really is. If the stated goal is reached, of greatly reducing CO2 in the atmosphere, this is bad for plant life. Let's say what -- 200ppm is acceptable? Lower than that?

Or, is it simply just wanting to TAX pollution, rather than reduce it?

Cap and trade hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried, not if you're talking reduction of carbon. What it has done is the actual goal, global redistribution of wealth.

When will the sycophants stop pretending it's about saving the earth, and just be straight?

Well, Midnight old sot, if you do not know the levels of GHGs for the interglacial and glacial periods, then you have failed to do even the slightest research.

Cap and trade worked very well on sulphate emissions. They can work equally well for GHG emissions. The problem is that they are too slow in working.

When will you get a brain, Midnight?:lol:

maybe he can have yours seeing as it's never been used?

reuse, recycle, conserve, right?
 
I wonder what the goal really is. If the stated goal is reached, of greatly reducing CO2 in the atmosphere, this is bad for plant life. Let's say what -- 200ppm is acceptable? Lower than that?

Or, is it simply just wanting to TAX pollution, rather than reduce it?

Cap and trade hasn't worked anywhere it's been tried, not if you're talking reduction of carbon. What it has done is the actual goal, global redistribution of wealth.

When will the sycophants stop pretending it's about saving the earth, and just be straight?

Well, Midnight old sot, if you do not know the levels of GHGs for the interglacial and glacial periods, then you have failed to do even the slightest research.

Cap and trade worked very well on sulphate emissions. They can work equally well for GHG emissions. The problem is that they are too slow in working.

When will you get a brain, Midnight?:lol:

maybe he can have yours seeing as it's never been used?

reuse, recycle, conserve, right?
I wouldn't want his atrophied and drug-addled brain! I like my healthy and sharp one!
 

Forum List

Back
Top