What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

6 Jan Committee Was a 1-sided Partisan 'Get Trump 3.0' Shite Show By Design to Intentionally Leave Out Alot

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
64,597
Reaction score
20,155
Points
2,260
Some Republicans boycotted the committee. If it's one sided...that is their fault.

They "boycotted" because Pelosi refused to seat the Republicans selected for the committee, a breach of protocol.

Then she got a Quisling to sit under HER appointment.

Sorry, but you can't refuse to sit the selected minority party members then blame said minority party for not participating.
 

berg80

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
8,440
Reaction score
5,212
Points
970
They "boycotted" because Pelosi refused to seat the Republicans selected for the committee, a breach of protocol.
She rightly refused to seat Jordan and Banks because she understood why McCarthy picked them.

What has The Following's shorts in a bunch is despite displaying extreme cowardice by not coming forth earlier, former members of the admin are now telling their first hand accounts of what happened in the days leading up to 1/6. All their sworn testimony is burying the dishonest Trump narrative and The Following is struggling to cope.
 

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
64,597
Reaction score
20,155
Points
2,260
She rightly refused to seat Jordan and Banks because she understood why McCarthy picked them.

What has The Following's shorts in a bunch is despite displaying extreme cowardice by not coming forth earlier, former members of the admin are now telling their first hand accounts of what happened in the days leading up to 1/6. All their sworn testimony is burying the dishonest Trump narrative and The Following is struggling to cope.

She ignored centuries of precedent so only her hacks were on the panel.

It just shows this was all politics and TDS.
 

candycorn

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
87,998
Reaction score
25,295
Points
2,180
They "boycotted" because Pelosi refused to seat the Republicans selected for the committee, a breach of protocol.

Then she got a Quisling to sit under HER appointment.

Sorry, but you can't refuse to sit the selected minority party members then blame said minority party for not participating.
Sure we can...because that is what happened.
 

berg80

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
8,440
Reaction score
5,212
Points
970
She ignored centuries of precedent so only her hacks were on the panel.
Let's pretend your baseless accusation is true (which it isn't). What specifically about the way the committee has conducted itself is your objection? Cuz I have a feeling your major objection is to the evidence, COMING FROM FORMER MEMBERS OF THE ADMIN, it has revealed.
 

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
64,597
Reaction score
20,155
Points
2,260
Let's pretend your baseless accusation is true (which it isn't). What specifically about the way the committee has conducted itself is your objection? Cuz I have a feeling your major objection is to the evidence, COMING FROM FORMER MEMBERS OF THE ADMIN, it has revealed.

It's a dog and pony show, just like the "impeachments".

The Republicans rightly did not participate because they were not allowed to select their representatives, which is the way it is normally done. All Dems got were quislings, Dems in Republican clothing that will not be in congress after 2022 elections are over.
 

badbob85037

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2018
Messages
2,458
Reaction score
1,682
Points
1,938
Nancy Pelosi carefully picked her 'Select' committee members carefully. They consisted of Trump-obsessed, Impeachment proven criminals, and Democrats posing as Republicans.

This was a partisan, 1-sided committee from the start by design to hide the truth and make false accusations and narratives without any opposing interference.

For instance, Democrats attempted to make it seem that Trump and Republicans challenging election results is Illegal, Un-Constitutional, a threat to our Drmocracy ... while not bringing up the fact that Democrats have challenged 3 times more election results than Republicans. Democrats even attempted to disenfranchise voters - entire states.

Let's take a look at what Democrats did NOT want brought up today in their committee hearing:


2000

In 2000 over a dozen Democratic House members objected to the allocation of Florida’s Electoral College votes to Bush. Rep. Alcee L. Hastings (D-FL) called Florida’s result into question, citing the alleged “overwhelming evidence of official misconduct” in his state.

Al Gore called for an entire new vote in Florida. When he was told this could not be done because overseas absentee votes (heavily mikitary who HEAVILY vote Republican) coud not be recast and returned in time, Gore suggested NOT allowing overseas votes to count in the 3nd Florida vote he demanded.

GORE PLED FOR A SECOND FLORIDA ELECTION IN WHICH OVERSEAS VOTERS, TO INCLUDE HEAVILY REPUBLICAN-VOTING MILITARY MEMBERS,
BE DISENFRANCHISED.

____________

2004

In 2004, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH) stopped the counting of electoral votes with a formal objection. Boxer sought to disenfranchise every voter in Ohio.

No other Democratic senator voted in favor of Boxer’s objection, leading the motion to fail in the Senate by a 74-1 vote.

______________

2016

In 2016, a tense electoral process saw some raise the possibility of faithless electors; the idea failed to gain necessary support, however, as some at the time predicted. On Jan. 6, several Democratic House members raised objections to the electoral vote count, citing voter suppression, among other things. However, as in 2000, the objectors were unable to gain the support from the Senate, dooming their efforts.

_____________

2000

in 2000, it was the outgoing Democratic Vice President, Joe Biden, who put a stop to Democrat election objections. Biden refused to allow additional House members to explain their objections, conclusively stating, “It is over.”

Of course few Americans know anything about these instances when Democrats challenged elections and even attempted to disenfranchise entire states' voters by seeking to throw out their entire election.

The fake news pro-Democrat media were not going to make a big thing of it, and the 6 Jan Committee, who stacked the court and tossed any and all opposition party and anyone who would attempt to bring up both sides, was not going to tell Americans not only challenged elections but did so 3 times as much.
I think you gave that committee way to much credit which would have not been any more than a very short rope and a do over if the first one fails.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
28,206
Reaction score
16,269
Points
1,445
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
They "boycotted" because Pelosi refused to seat the Republicans selected for the committee, a breach of protocol.

Then she got a Quisling to sit under HER appointment.

Sorry, but you can't refuse to sit the selected minority party members then blame said minority party for not participating.
You're trying to explain commonsense to an idiot partisan... it won't work..
 

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
64,597
Reaction score
20,155
Points
2,260
You're trying to explain commonsense to an idiot partisan... it won't work..

But idiocy has to be countered or it can be accepted as fact.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
28,206
Reaction score
16,269
Points
1,445
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
But idiocy has to be countered or it can be accepted as fact.
I agree... I am now very alert to those who will spin in circles just to keep you from moving forward and teaching. IT gets old after the 500th time of explaining it and they still continue to spin... We have three or four of these individuals who try to stifle the debate by running in circles with scissors.
 

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
64,597
Reaction score
20,155
Points
2,260
I agree... I am now very alert to those who will spin in circles just to keep you from moving forward and teaching. IT gets old after the 500th time of explaining it and they still continue to spin... We have three or four of these individuals who try to stifle the debate by running in circles with scissors.

They aren't trusted with real scissors, they get the plastic kindergarten ones.
 

woodwork201

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
4,284
Reaction score
2,650
Points
1,938
Yeah, I remember how Pelosi likes to micromanage her witvh hunts, not allowing GOP reps who would poke holes in the Democrats lies, no witnesses of their own, no cross-examinations, no bringing up massive hypocritical, damaging facts on the Democrats, etc... like I pointed out above.

Again, Candy, this was a 1-sided, heavily orchestrated 'Get Trump' shit show, a waste of tax dollars, and we are no closer to finding out what happened before, during, or after 6 Jan at the Capitol, what obvious role the FBI, what was the breakdown in security, and who was responsible for the many failures in decisions and avtions. Pelosi and Democrats made it all about Trump, Trump, Trump...which was her intent from the start.

Of course, that's great if you are a crazed, obsessed, TDS-suffering netball who still wants to take down Trump after 6 years, despite the real problems going on 1.5 years into another President's term....like you.

You'd rather focus on Pelosi's 2022 DEMOCRAT campaign infomercial - 'Orange Man Still Bad' - and attempted distraction from dementia Joe burning down the country.

Luckily the 6 Jan Committee's piss-poor ratings show there aren't many moreTrump-obsessed nutbags, that Americans have moved on and are focused on the pain and struggle Biden is causing them every day.
Mostly the most anti-Trump and the most pro-Trump voters are watching. No one is getting their minds changed. You're absolutely right that Pelosi thought this was going to be must-see-TV and that it was going to get the left excited in the way they were in the 2020 election - because they need that excitement to provide cover for the coming voter fraud.

If the left is unexcited and stays home then having 84 million votes for leftist candidates is hard to explain. And the only thing that's really inspired the left in the last 50 years is their hatred for Trump.
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
99,808
Reaction score
43,436
Points
2,320
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
Let's pretend your baseless accusation is true (which it isn't). What specifically about the way the committee has conducted itself is your objection? Cuz I have a feeling your major objection is to the evidence, COMING FROM FORMER MEMBERS OF THE ADMIN, it has revealed.
Yep. This hasn't exactly been a parade of commies up there under oath.

Meanwhile, the cult leaders are all hiding from saying anything under oath.

I suspect that's what has the rubes so cranky.
 

woodwork201

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
4,284
Reaction score
2,650
Points
1,938
She rightly refused to seat Jordan and Banks because she understood why McCarthy picked them.

What has The Following's shorts in a bunch is despite displaying extreme cowardice by not coming forth earlier, former members of the admin are now telling their first hand accounts of what happened in the days leading up to 1/6. All their sworn testimony is burying the dishonest Trump narrative and The Following is struggling to cope.
How is the show trial burying Trump? There hasn't been a single new bit of evidence. The show trial is purely a Soviet-style attempt to marginalize all Trump supporters, all conservatives, and, potentially, give Merrick Garland cover to actually charge a former president as an enemy of the state.
 

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
28,206
Reaction score
16,269
Points
1,445
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
How is the show trial burying Trump? There hasn't been a single new bit of evidence. The show trial is purely a Soviet-style attempt to marginalize all Trump supporters, all conservatives, and, potentially, give Merrick Garland cover to actually charge a former president as an enemy of the state.
This is a blatant attempt to frame Trump... nothing more... and now its failing horribly... From day one, when Cheney stated that Pelosi had recieved the smae briefings as Trump but refused to take apporiate protective posture and that a Schumer staffer failed to give the CHP that briefing information, it became perfctly clear this was a set up.

Cheney laid out what Pelosi knew.... but then failed to ask any furhter investigative questions as to how she acted... From then on it was clearly an ochestrated event by Pelosi.
 
Last edited:
OP
easyt65

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
80,013
Reaction score
45,896
Points
2,645
Thought Cheney was going to go ballistic when the Chairman said they would refer no one for criminal prosecution - he knew there was nothing to this shit show and didn't want to embarrass Democrats with another nothingburger Political Theater 'Get Trump' failure.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$45.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top