300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data

Freewill

Platinum Member
Oct 26, 2011
31,158
5,072
1,130
Actually, the opposite is more likely to be true. The "300 scientists" are demanding that NOAA admit that their data was cherry-picked to eliminate the apparent "pause" in warming, in order to support the President's political agenda. They want all of the relevant data to be released, so that interested people can assess for themselves whether there has been a "pause."
 
ISKCON7.PNG


Settled science
science settled

Global warming
warming global
 
300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data

“We, the undersigned, scientists, engineers, economists and others, who have looked carefully into the effects of carbon dioxide released by human activities, wish to record our support for the efforts of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology to ensure that federal agencies complied with federal guidelines that implemented the Data Quality Act,” some 300 scientists, engineers and other experts wrote to Chairman of the House Science Committee, Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith.

Truly amazing how 300 'scientists, engineers, economists, and others' become 300 credentialed scientists. Probably a couple of senile old bats with credentials, and 298 'others'.

300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data


“As has been acknowledged by numerous scientists, the engine intake data are clearly contaminated by heat conduction from the structure, and as such, never intended for scientific use,” wrote climate scientists Dr. Patrick J. Michaels and Dr. Richard S. Lindzen of the libertarian Cato Institute on the in the science blog Watts Up With That. “Adjusting good data upward to match bad data seems questionable.”


Ah yes, Lindzen again. The fellow that took tobacco company money to testify in front of Congress as to the harmlessness of cigarettes.
 
300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data

“We, the undersigned, scientists, engineers, economists and others, who have looked carefully into the effects of carbon dioxide released by human activities, wish to record our support for the efforts of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology to ensure that federal agencies complied with federal guidelines that implemented the Data Quality Act,” some 300 scientists, engineers and other experts wrote to Chairman of the House Science Committee, Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith.

Truly amazing how 300 'scientists, engineers, economists, and others' become 300 credentialed scientists. Probably a couple of senile old bats with credentials, and 298 'others'.

300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data


“As has been acknowledged by numerous scientists, the engine intake data are clearly contaminated by heat conduction from the structure, and as such, never intended for scientific use,” wrote climate scientists Dr. Patrick J. Michaels and Dr. Richard S. Lindzen of the libertarian Cato Institute on the in the science blog Watts Up With That. “Adjusting good data upward to match bad data seems questionable.”


Ah yes, Lindzen again. The fellow that took tobacco company money to testify in front of Congress as to the harmlessness of cigarettes.


Come on old rocks post your list again so I can make fun of It. :)
 
300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data

“We, the undersigned, scientists, engineers, economists and others, who have looked carefully into the effects of carbon dioxide released by human activities, wish to record our support for the efforts of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology to ensure that federal agencies complied with federal guidelines that implemented the Data Quality Act,” some 300 scientists, engineers and other experts wrote to Chairman of the House Science Committee, Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith.

Truly amazing how 300 'scientists, engineers, economists, and others' become 300 credentialed scientists. Probably a couple of senile old bats with credentials, and 298 'others'.

300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data


“As has been acknowledged by numerous scientists, the engine intake data are clearly contaminated by heat conduction from the structure, and as such, never intended for scientific use,” wrote climate scientists Dr. Patrick J. Michaels and Dr. Richard S. Lindzen of the libertarian Cato Institute on the in the science blog Watts Up With That. “Adjusting good data upward to match bad data seems questionable.”


Ah yes, Lindzen again. The fellow that took tobacco company money to testify in front of Congress as to the harmlessness of cigarettes.


Come on old rocks post your list again so I can make fun of It. :)
List? Don't need a list. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And then we have the GOP and the 'Conservatives', the only large group in the world that denies global warming. Even your hero Putin states that it is real and a problem.
 
300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data

“We, the undersigned, scientists, engineers, economists and others, who have looked carefully into the effects of carbon dioxide released by human activities, wish to record our support for the efforts of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology to ensure that federal agencies complied with federal guidelines that implemented the Data Quality Act,” some 300 scientists, engineers and other experts wrote to Chairman of the House Science Committee, Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith.

Truly amazing how 300 'scientists, engineers, economists, and others' become 300 credentialed scientists. Probably a couple of senile old bats with credentials, and 298 'others'.

300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data


“As has been acknowledged by numerous scientists, the engine intake data are clearly contaminated by heat conduction from the structure, and as such, never intended for scientific use,” wrote climate scientists Dr. Patrick J. Michaels and Dr. Richard S. Lindzen of the libertarian Cato Institute on the in the science blog Watts Up With That. “Adjusting good data upward to match bad data seems questionable.”


Ah yes, Lindzen again. The fellow that took tobacco company money to testify in front of Congress as to the harmlessness of cigarettes.

So why is NOAA hiding the data?
 
Three months till Global Warming season in the middle of the USA when the left will blame global warming on all of the tornadoes.
Having not finished my first cup of coffee this morning, I just read that as "blame global warming on all of the tomatoes"
it really made more sense when I read it the second time and saw tornadoes.
I was worried at first, I thought they were going to try and figure out how to turn corn into tomatoes next.
 
300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data

“We, the undersigned, scientists, engineers, economists and others, who have looked carefully into the effects of carbon dioxide released by human activities, wish to record our support for the efforts of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology to ensure that federal agencies complied with federal guidelines that implemented the Data Quality Act,” some 300 scientists, engineers and other experts wrote to Chairman of the House Science Committee, Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith.

Truly amazing how 300 'scientists, engineers, economists, and others' become 300 credentialed scientists. Probably a couple of senile old bats with credentials, and 298 'others'.

300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data


“As has been acknowledged by numerous scientists, the engine intake data are clearly contaminated by heat conduction from the structure, and as such, never intended for scientific use,” wrote climate scientists Dr. Patrick J. Michaels and Dr. Richard S. Lindzen of the libertarian Cato Institute on the in the science blog Watts Up With That. “Adjusting good data upward to match bad data seems questionable.”


Ah yes, Lindzen again. The fellow that took tobacco company money to testify in front of Congress as to the harmlessness of cigarettes.


Come on old rocks post your list again so I can make fun of It. :)
List? Don't need a list. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. And then we have the GOP and the 'Conservatives', the only large group in the world that denies global warming. Even your hero Putin states that it is real and a problem.

Guess you are having amnesia now..just like a data fudge packer


Deny

Deny

Deny!!!!!!
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top