Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Right. More bullets flying around the public would no doubt lead to a much safer situation.Right.....
No! The vast majority of the killing is being done by people already restricted from owning and or carrying a firearm. Further infringement of the rights of a law abiding gun owner would do nothing, zip zero nada to prevent such a shooting.
However, had there been a few dozen licensed gun owners there with their weapons, the damage may have been limited.
After all, each gun carrier is Annie Oakley.
Obviously the mall owners must be prosecuted for failing to make the "no guns" signs sufficiently large and too few in number.
It was a "gun free zone". The mall restricted weapons to security and police.Right.....
No! The vast majority of the killing is being done by people already restricted from owning and or carrying a firearm. Further infringement of the rights of a law abiding gun owner would do nothing, zip zero nada to prevent such a shooting.
However, had there been a few dozen licensed gun owners there with their weapons, the damage may have been limited.
There were a few dozen licensed gun owners there. They were the security guards.
I can't remember the source, but another article said that all the security officers are armed since the December flash mob incident. Nobody said it was a gun free zone. Guns were restricted for customers.
It was a "gun free zone". The mall restricted weapons to security and police.Right.....
No! The vast majority of the killing is being done by people already restricted from owning and or carrying a firearm. Further infringement of the rights of a law abiding gun owner would do nothing, zip zero nada to prevent such a shooting.
However, had there been a few dozen licensed gun owners there with their weapons, the damage may have been limited.
There were a few dozen licensed gun owners there. They were the security guards.
I can't remember the source, but another article said that all the security officers are armed since the December flash mob incident. Nobody said it was a gun free zone. Guns were restricted for customers.
It is a gun free zone when normal people can't carry guns......there aren't enough security in any mall to stop targeted shootings like this......the guards would help in a general attack...but it is still a gun free zone for the law abiding...just not for killers.....
It was a "gun free zone". The mall restricted weapons to security and police.Right.....
No! The vast majority of the killing is being done by people already restricted from owning and or carrying a firearm. Further infringement of the rights of a law abiding gun owner would do nothing, zip zero nada to prevent such a shooting.
However, had there been a few dozen licensed gun owners there with their weapons, the damage may have been limited.
There were a few dozen licensed gun owners there. They were the security guards.
I can't remember the source, but another article said that all the security officers are armed since the December flash mob incident. Nobody said it was a gun free zone. Guns were restricted for customers.
It is a gun free zone when normal people can't carry guns......there aren't enough security in any mall to stop targeted shootings like this......the guards would help in a general attack...but it is still a gun free zone for the law abiding...just not for killers.....
Are you bored? Because you are wasting time talking sense to a gun grabber.
It was a "gun free zone". The mall restricted weapons to security and police.Right.....
No! The vast majority of the killing is being done by people already restricted from owning and or carrying a firearm. Further infringement of the rights of a law abiding gun owner would do nothing, zip zero nada to prevent such a shooting.
However, had there been a few dozen licensed gun owners there with their weapons, the damage may have been limited.
There were a few dozen licensed gun owners there. They were the security guards.
I can't remember the source, but another article said that all the security officers are armed since the December flash mob incident. Nobody said it was a gun free zone. Guns were restricted for customers.
It is a gun free zone when normal people can't carry guns......there aren't enough security in any mall to stop targeted shootings like this......the guards would help in a general attack...but it is still a gun free zone for the law abiding...just not for killers.....
Are you bored? Because you are wasting time talking sense to a gun grabber.
It was a "gun free zone". The mall restricted weapons to security and police.There were a few dozen licensed gun owners there. They were the security guards.
I can't remember the source, but another article said that all the security officers are armed since the December flash mob incident. Nobody said it was a gun free zone. Guns were restricted for customers.
It is a gun free zone when normal people can't carry guns......there aren't enough security in any mall to stop targeted shootings like this......the guards would help in a general attack...but it is still a gun free zone for the law abiding...just not for killers.....
Are you bored? Because you are wasting time talking sense to a gun grabber.
Gun grabber? I'm a strong supporter of gun rights, and think "gun free zones" are pointless. All I stated was that the mall wasn't technically what people refer to as gun free zones. This is more the equivalent of any business that requests people not bring weapons in with them.
