+18 Video

[ekrem]

+18 Video

 

[ekrem]

Thank you for having made children's future better.
Thank you for bringing Democracy.
Thank you for bringing 9/11 bombers within Iraq to justice.
Thank you for having removed the WMD's that threatened the world back in 2002, and were launchable within 45 minutes.

 

[Madeline]

ekrem, what could the US have possibly used that would cause genetic damage?

 

[ekrem]

ekrem, what could the US have possibly used that would cause genetic damage?

I am no scientific doctor.
But, Fallujah is Sunnite. When US vs Fallujah citizens fighting reached its peak, within the media they talked about the Sunnite triangle, which Fallujah is part of:
Sunni Triangle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Most guys from Saddam regime were of this area, which means, that possibly and very likely the available ressources within Saddam's Iraq benefited those residents most. The genetic defects are likely not caused by inhumane and dirty living conditions in this area.

 

[ekrem]

"Fallujah was declared a ‘free-fire zone' in November 2004 and we told the civilian population that they had to leave because the entire city was going to be deemed hostile territory," explains Zollie Goodman, a former U.S. Navy petty officer who served in Fallujah
Foreign Policy In Focus | Fallujah Fall Guy

Illegal invasion, collective punishment.
BBC video is just colateral damage.
"Who talks of the Fallujinians?" will ask the next crazy leader anywhere in world anywhere in future, by that trying to ridiculate his advisors morale opposition to the kind of weapons being proposed for the attack.

 

[Madeline]

Are you suggesting the genetic damage was done by weapons used against the US? What, exactly, do you suspect? Some sort of germ warfare?

 

[logical4u]

+18 Video

When we first went into Iraq, there was stories about chemicals (for weapons) being dumped in the rivers. Our guys tested the water and found small amounts (but nothing that could trace it or say what amount had been dumped). Sadam did use chemical weapons on the Kurds; the chemicals were there.

 

[ekrem]

When we first went into Iraq, there was stories about chemicals (for weapons) being dumped in the rivers. Our guys tested the water and found small amounts (but nothing that could trace it or say what amount had been dumped). Sadam did use chemical weapons on the Kurds; the chemicals were there.

The same story-writers that wrote speech of Powell's UN Security Speech?
Probably they should write, that the chemicals in addition to nuclear material has flowed though the river into Iran and now are in the hands of the Mullahs-

 

[Madeline]

This is horrible, ekrec. What can be done to help?

 

[ekrem]

(...) What can be done to help?

I don't know which options there are, but if all options fail, there is still the option to send them to Abu Guantanamo, as Al Qaeda's recruitment agency probably will look out for 12-finger humans as they are better with coordination in engineering a bomb under time pressure.
Everyday something evil with those Muslims, now they show up even with 6 finger hand.

 

[ekrem]

BBC said, that some were too dreadful to even show on TV.

 

[ekrem]

too dreadfull to show on TV

probably they meant such case

 

[ekrem]

You dont give a fuck, and you are no friends of the Muslims.
Look, what you do. We dont want you, we dont like you.
Best thing of all is, you play morale compass and pretend you do for world peace.
You fool noone.

 

[ekrem]

Hope/Change, my ass.

 

[hipeter924]

Hope/Change, my ass.

One thing you can say for Bush is that he was more honest with his policy. I am sure you have noticed the Obama flip flop over the Armenian Genocide (in difference to Bush who admitted upon election he wouldn't be able to recognize it). Then there is how he and his administration made a rant about Israel and then ended up going back to aunt Israel and trying to make up. But can you expect any different from a popularist President, do you really think he cares about anyone (even the Palestinians he claims he wants to help)? He's in for the votes, and as much power as he can lay his hands on.

 

[asterism]

too dreadfull to show on TV

probably they meant such case

I saw that much and worse in Zakhu, Iraq in 1991. So?

 

[Jos]

ekrem, what could the US have possibly used that would cause genetic damage?

The use of DU in munitions is controversial because of questions about potential long-term health effects.[4][5] Normal functioning of the kidney, brain, liver, heart, and numerous other systems can be affected by uranium exposure, because in addition to being weakly radioactive, uranium is a toxic metal.[6] It is weakly radioactive and remains so because of its long physical half-life (4.468 billion years for uranium-238), but has a considerably shorter biological half-life. The aerosol produced during impact and combustion of depleted uranium munitions can potentially contaminate wide areas around the impact sites or can be inhaled by civilians and military personnel.[7] During a three week period of conflict in 2003 in Iraq, 1,000 to 2,000 tonnes of DU munitions were used, mostly in cities.[8]

The actual acute and chronic toxicity of DU is also a point of medical controversy. Multiple studies using cultured cells and laboratory rodents suggest the possibility of leukemogenic, genetic, reproductive, and neurological effects from chronic exposure.[4] A 2005 epidemiology review concluded: "In aggregate the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to DU

Depleted uranium - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Kalam]

ekrem, what could the US have possibly used that would cause genetic damage?

Depleted uranium, I think.

 

[Kalam]

too dreadfull to show on TV

probably they meant such case

I saw that much and worse in Zakhu, Iraq in 1991. So?

...Well I guess that means this is no big deal after all! Thanks!

 

[asterism]

probably they meant such case

I saw that much and worse in Zakhu, Iraq in 1991. So?

...Well I guess that means this is no big deal after all! Thanks!

No, it means that there has been a problem in Iraq with this sort of thing long before the US invaded.