Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, depending on the jurisdiction, it might not be “murder.”
But we can always count on you to deliberately misframe the issue.
That's right. I am. A vote for ANYBODY other than Trump is a vote for Biden. And any Patriot who stays home and doesn't vote in this election has cast his/her vote for Biden
Thsts fin. I’ll deal with the DA while his family is dealing with the coroner. My issue is temporary. Theirs is permanent.Those of you who reflexively argue the Homeowner should have shot the dolt stealing from the car. You are wrong. The homeowner would face murder charges
That depends on the family member versus the stuff. I’ve got a lot of family members I’d love to see die and even more stuff I’d kill over.,Losing a loved one is a pain that far surpasses the pain of losing stuff
No shit, Sherlock. Of course, as you should know, that’s beside the point.Uh, guy, even if the shooting is justified (which they rarely, rarely are) the consequences are still horrific in terms of civil suits.
I neither know nor care. Also irrelevant.How many cops are cleared in shooting incidents but still lose their jobs, and the city they work for ends up paying huge settlements?
Not necessarily. You making shit up isn’t much of an argument, little feller.Sure you can shoot a car thief, and his family will sue. Even if you prevail in civil court, it still ends up costing you more than the fucking car.
Obviously, the points went over your head, so there's no point in explaining them to you.No shit, Sherlock. Of course, as you should know, that’s beside the point.
I neither know nor care. Also irrelevant.
Not necessarily. You making shit up isn’t much of an argument, little feller.
Obviously, the points went over your head, so there's no point in explaining them to you.
It's just a fucking car. It's not worth risking anyone's life over.
YOUR opinion.It's just a fucking car. It's not worth risking anyone's life over.
Well, depending on the jurisdiction, it might not be “murder.”
But we can always count on you to deliberately misframe the issue.
What’s obvious, chump, is that you’re a biased droning hack.Obviously, the points went over your head, so there's no point in explaining them to you.
It's just a fucking car. It's not worth risking anyone's life over.
You mean they don't think things through about why having a shootout in the middle of the street might be a terrible idea?YOUR opinion.
a lot of people don't have your robotic outlook.
Yiur counsel is that since life is more important than a possession (like a car), car theft victims should simply and meekly permit the theft to take place. While that may be a reasonable POV in some instances, in others it makes no sense whatsoever.
You mean they don't think things through about why having a shootout in the middle of the street might be a terrible idea?
They could be killed, a third party could be killed. Maybe the thief might be killed, but what if it was a kid just out for a harmless joy ride? (which is why 46% of stolen cars are recovered.)
no.You mean they don't think things through about why having a shootout in the middle of the street might be a terrible idea?
Risk/benefit analysis, it never makes sense to risk lives over a car.
As much as you gun wanks like to fantasize over "shooting a bad guy", that never works out well. Just ask Zimmerman and Rittenhouse.
you should change your avatar.Risk/benefit analysis, it never makes sense to risk lives over a car.
You mean they don't think things through about why having a shootout in the middle of the street might be a terrible idea?
They could be killed, a third party could be killed. Maybe the thief might be killed, but what if it was a kid just out for a harmless joy ride? (which is why 46% of stolen cars are recovered.)
Yet he was usually the guy who solved the problem of the week!
ZzzzzRisk/benefit analysis, it never makes sense to risk lives over a car.
As much as you gun wanks like to fantasize over "shooting a bad guy", that never works out well. Just ask Zimmerman and Rittenhouse.
Risk/benefit analysis, it never makes sense to risk lives over a car.
As much as you gun wanks like to fantasize over "shooting a bad guy", that never works out well. Just ask Zimmerman and Rittenhouse.
ask them what?Just ask Zimmerman and Rittenhouse.
Neither of them was in any lethal danger and they initiated the confrontations that led to their lives being ruined.ask them what?
are you alive?
Did you successfully defend yourself?
would you rather be dead?
again, YOUR opinion.Neither of them was in any lethal danger and they initiated the confrontations that led to their lives being ruined.
And so what?again, YOUR opinion.
Courts decided otherwise.
they were in more danger than the cop that killed Babbitt, your side, and congress, gave him a pass.
