Tommy Tuberville admits he went to NYC to help trump break his gag order.

The proven liar was the guy Trump chose to Fix his problems, he was Trump's right hand man, for 10 years.

Prosecutors didn't choose him as their witness.... Trump did by having him do his dirty work, the past ten years.
So what? You can’t convict someone for what you THINK they were thinking.
 
No they don't. They lock you up for failing to obey Court Orders, just like they do in the USA.

Trump and the MAGA Cult funded a protest of lockdowns that ended BEFORE the truckers left home to go to Ottawa. They kept going and spent weeks getting drunk, partying all night, and pissing on national monuments. The NAZI, Confederate and Trump flags they were all flying didn't go over well either.

After two years in lockdown the citizens of Ottawa couldn't go out of their homes because the streets were full of drunk, unemployed, hosers, who threatened them for wearing masks.


Citizens groups took the truckers to Court, to end the disruption to their lives, and the Courts ordered the truckers to go home.


THE PEOPLE OF OTTAWA SENT THESE FUCKING ASSHOLE HOME. THE TRUDEAU GOVERNMENT SEIZED ALL OF THE FUNDS RAISED AND RETURNED THEM TO THEIR AMERICAN DONORS.

Keep voting for your Fascist cuck PM, Simp.
 
Yes, when they're related to "personal expenses" being falsely claimed as "business expenses".

Who owns the company?

Paying "hush money" to your mistress isn't a tax deductible personal expense,

NDAs are tax deductible.

nor is it illegal.

I agree, deducting an NDA is not illegal.

It's called "falsifying business records" and "tax evasion".

How were taxes evaded? Walk through the steps.
You are wasting your time trying to educate that one…..but doing a great job of exposing her ignorance.
 
Trump paid less in taxes because the checks were inflated. But the point of these crimes was to conceal EMI's illegal campaign contributions, and the "catch and kill" schemes they were carrying out.

As a SOP for Trump to deal with unflattering publicity, nothing in the "catch and kill scheme" was illegal UNTIL Trump started running for office, and even then, if Trump had paid off the women from his own resources and his own pocket, it wouldn't have been illegal. It was having others pay off the women, and having Pecker lie about his opposition, that turned the whole matter into an election crime, and it was Trump's attempts to write the whole thing off as a business expense that got him arrested.

The testimony of Pecker, Hope Hicks, and other Trump Corporation and White House staffers - Trump was obsessed with details, especially about payments. Trump was trying to avoid paying anyone until after the election because if he lost, he was never going to pay anyone. Trump scrutinized every single check he signed and demanded discounts for everything - except those payments to Cohen.

The notes with Weisselberg's handwriting. The tape recording. The invoices. The checks - all personally signed by Donald Trump. Trump's attempts to force Cohen not to write a book - threatening to send him back to prison unless he agreed not to talk to the press. All indications of Trump's intentions, and his guilt.
Once again, you can pack more lies in one post than anyone in history.
 
NDA's are only tax deductible when they relate to business. If you buy someone's silence about your proprietary information or processes, which they legally acquire, that's NDA is tax deductible.

If you pay off your mistress so your wife doesn't find out about the affair, that NDA is NOT tax deductible. If you pay off your mistress because you're running for election and you're lying to the American people, that's not tax deductible either.
Why didn’t the IRS get involved, Simp?
 
That was your reply to:
Nostra said:
How would you know about free speech? You live in KKKanada where they lock you up for disagreeing with the government.

###​

New Liberal 'online harms' bill to make online hate punishable up to life in prison

Bill C-63 aims to force social media, user-uploaded adult content and live-streaming services to reduce exposure to online content deemed harmful.

Author of the article:
Catherine Lévesque
Published Feb 26, 2024 • Last updated Feb 27, 2024 • 6-minute read

That is gonna leave a mark on Dragonlady
 
Cohen did not falsify trump org business records....he has no part in the organization to do that.

Allen Weisselberg falsified the repayment to Cohen, business records. The claim is he met with Trump to do so. He wrote in notes, how they would falsify the records, and what the amounts were for.... Weisselberg does nothing financially, without Trump approval. Trump signed 9 out of 12 of the over inflated reimbursement checks to Cohen.

is that enough to convict Trump? I dunno? That's up to the jury.
Weisselberg is or was in prison. I spoke to Cohen falsifying his records, not Trumps. Cohen said over and over prior to going to prison, he has nothing on Trump and then was sent to prison.

 
Cohen did not falsify trump org business records....he has no part in the organization to do that.

Allen Weisselberg falsified the repayment to Cohen, business records. The claim is he met with Trump to do so. He wrote in notes, how they would falsify the records, and what the amounts were for.... Weisselberg does nothing financially, without Trump approval. Trump signed 9 out of 12 of the over inflated reimbursement checks to Cohen.

is that enough to convict Trump? I dunno? That's up to the jury.
Let's deal with Trump first. Trump did not contact the women. They wanted money. They wanted to market stories. Cohen got involved. So records of payment would be his records. Trump should not be on trial. You assume the Accountant working for Trump did not do things on his own. Can you prove that? Even so the women extorted the funds. They should be on trial.
 
Let's deal with Trump first. Trump did not contact the women. They wanted money. They wanted to market stories. Cohen got involved. So records of payment would be his records. Trump should not be on trial. You assume the Accountant working for Trump did not do things on his own. Can you prove that? Even so the women extorted the funds. They should be on trial.
You don't know what is going on in this trial Robert. She extorted no funds. NDAs are NOT a crime, remember....that's what Trumpers keep saying.

Yes Cohen committed a crime. And the Trump Org committed 34 crimes falsifying their business records to reimburse that crime.

The trial presented evidence that "the accountant, Alan Weisselberg" ....did nothing without speaking with Trump first.... No one in the whole company made a decision of importance without trump....and any expenditure over $10,000 had to have Trump's okay, even if it was his son signing the check.

The checks to Cohen were $35,000 a month, for 12 months, for his reimbursement on the Stormy NDA

THAT comes to Cohen being paid $420,000 for the $130,000 hush money payment. They falsified business records on why they were paying Cohen, and for what services....

The trial showed Alan Weisselberg hand written notes on how and why they would shell out $420,000 for the $130,000.

Do you believe Alan Weisselberg, would make the decision himself to spend $420,000 of Trump's money to Cohen, instead of the $130,000 he owed Cohen for the hush money payment, without Trump being part of this decision? Really?
 
You don't know what is going on in this trial Robert. She extorted no funds. NDAs are NOT a crime, remember....that's what Trumpers keep saying.

Yes Cohen committed a crime. And the Trump Org committed 34 crimes falsifying their business records to reimburse that crime.

The trial presented evidence that "the accountant, Alan Weisselberg" ....did nothing without speaking with Trump first.... No one in the whole company made a decision of importance without trump....and any expenditure over $10,000 had to have Trump's okay, even if it was his son signing the check.

The checks to Cohen were $35,000 a month, for 12 months, for his reimbursement on the Stormy NDA

THAT comes to Cohen being paid $420,000 for the $130,000 hush money payment. They falsified business records on why they were paying Cohen, and for what services....

The trial showed Alan Weisselberg hand written notes on how and why they would shell out $420,000 for the $130,000.

Do you believe Alan Weisselberg, would make the decision himself to spend $420,000 of Trump's money to Cohen, instead of the $130,000 he owed Cohen for the hush money payment, without Trump being part of this decision? Really?
🥨 🥨 🥨
 
Let's deal with Trump first. Trump did not contact the women. They wanted money. They wanted to market stories. Cohen got involved. So records of payment would be his records. Trump should not be on trial. You assume the Accountant working for Trump did not do things on his own. Can you prove that? Even so the women extorted the funds. They should be on trial.
She didn't extort the funds.... Trump paid her off, to NOT sell HER STORY to a number of different magazines or papers willing to pay her for her story.

He was Catching and Killing the story..... That was to Trump's benefit, not hers....she could have gotten money from a tabloid paper or celebrity magazine or show like Access Hollywood.
 
She didn't extort the funds.... Trump paid her off, to NOT sell HER STORY to a number of different magazines or papers willing to pay her for her story.

He was Catching and Killing the story..... That was to Trump's benefit, not hers....she could have gotten money from a tabloid paper or celebrity magazine or show like Access Hollywood.
Ok, so what’s the crime?
 
Ok, so what’s the crime?
The crime you ask about, was Cohen's election campaign finance crimes....maximum donation for a political candidate was $2500, Cohen's $130,000 was over the amount. It was establish the payout to stormy was for Trump's campaign benefit as a candidate running. Falsifying the business records was to cover up Trump's reimbursement to Cohen for the hush money payment.
 
The crime you ask about, was Cohen's election campaign finance crimes....maximum donation for a political candidate was $2500, Cohen's $130,000 was over the amount. It was establish the payout to stormy was for Trump's campaign benefit as a candidate running. Falsifying the business records was to cover up Trump's reimbursement to Cohen for the hush money payment.
No I didn’t asked about Cohen or his crimes. What was the crime committed by trump
 

Forum List

Back
Top