Haha, I was wondering if that was you. You're writing style is very distinct we shall say.hey cawacko.
What's up my dude.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Haha, I was wondering if that was you. You're writing style is very distinct we shall say.hey cawacko.
Well then you're just disagreeing on what global trade should look like, not that we shouldn't have global trade. As for the fake monetary policy I don't know what that means. Deeds of ownership, governments, borders, these things are all ultimately fake as well but they're useful fictions that allows us to cooperate flexibly in a world of increasing complexity.but trade and cooperation don't require bad trade policy and fake money totalitarianism.
yes. but when I start talking about tariffs people start trying to say I support full autarky (no trade at all).Well then you're just disagreeing on what global trade should look like, not that we shouldn't have global trade. As for the fake monetary policy I don't know what that means. Deeds of ownership, governments, borders, these things are all ultimately fake as well but they're useful fictions that allows us to cooperate flexibly in a world of increasing complexity.
Well of course not.I suppose I could post all the data showing this but in the name of brevity it shows that tariffs caused U.S. job loss and slowed economic growth along with increasing the price of goods.
Unions exist to look out for their workers, not what's best for the economy or country overall (teachers unions are the best example but it works the same here).
I'm simply responding to your arguments. I don't do cosplay and I don't make up other people's arguments. I'm more than capable of addressing the things you actually say.yes. but when I start talking about tariffs people start trying to say I support full autarky (no trade at all).
Globalist zealot is a pejorative, not an argument. What's a bad deal? Give some context.but we should walk away from overall bad deals and stop villainizing tariffs.. globalist zealots will rarely agree with that.
I don't even know if I'm supposed to be offended by being called a Globalist and I haven't used the word isolationism once in this conversation. Who's pretending?bottom line is that YOU GLOBALISTS pretend adequate tariffs are isolationism. it's not me pretending. it;s you.
GLobalist zealot is an honest descriptor of someone who wants to keep with bad globalist policies in spite of obvious detriment.I'm simply responding to your arguments. I don't do cosplay and I don't make up other people's arguments. I'm more than capable of addressing the things you actually say.
Globalist zealot is a pejorative, not an argument. What's a bad deal? Give some context.
I don't even know if I'm supposed to be offended by being called a Globalist and I haven't used the word isolationism once in this conversation. Who's pretending?
Is bad here and objective determination or a subjective one? Bad for whom?GLobalist zealot is an honest descriptor of someone who wants to keep with bad globalist policies in spite of obvious detriment.
who matters?Is bad here and objective determination or a subjective one? Bad for whom?
Y'all are realizing he won't win?Not sure at this point, was going to be the LP nominee, but that is unlikely.
My vote for POTUS will have no effect whatsoever. In my state I will join the 2.4 million people that do not vote for Biden, knowing our vote is wasted.
Y'all are realizing he won't win?
Take your gaslighting BS elsewhere, dipshit.Do you enjoy being a peasant?
If something doesn’t make “no sense”, that means it makes sense. Learn English.That don't make no sense.
I think you should be free to barter Im just curious as to who you're going to exchange chickens with for the things you need.
You seem to think people only barter with chickens. That’s just ignorant, tbh.Tampa selling his motorcycle but he didn't want chickens, he wanted greenbacks.
I'll give them a listen. But if the leadership of the party is stroking Trump, I'm less than hopeful.Wait until there is a Libertarian Party nominee, and assess that person.
Clearly, we have a terrible choice right now.
Traitor Joe/homO - gunning for "worst ever Presidency"
Trump - still bragging he "saved millions" with Murderous Fraud Vax
RRFKjr - voice, heroin use
Stein - left of left
West - ditto Stein
The Libertarian Party nominee may very well be the only sane choice we have. None of the above are
FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE
Sharp, smart, in their prime
GOOD AT SCIENCE!!!
LP will have a nominee by the end of May.
I'll give them a listen. But if the leadership of the party is stroking Trump, I'm less than hopeful.
We have to reject that mentality. Not that I want to see Biden in office, but every time we say "Anybody but ...", things get worse. No one gets my vote unless I actually think they will be a good leader. I'm not wasting my vote on one douchebag, just because some other douchebag is supposedly worse. Just say "no" to douchebags.Trump can try. Hardly a "libertarian" approach on covid by Trump. Libertarians are smart and good at science and math. Trump goes in there and says he did a "great job" with covid and he'll get ZERO libertarian votes...
Getting rid of Biden by any means necessary... OK,
I'm not that fixated on how the government handled covid. I mean, they failed, pretty obviously, but it was a novel thing, and no one really knew what to do.but do we have to re-install the flop who enabled that by installing Chris Wray, Sessions, Milley etc.... and has clearly lost his mind trying to claim he did a "fantastic job" on covid, which was actually
no one really knew what to do.
Trump will take any adoration he can.