Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 63,573
- 57,183
- 3,600
See that title? That is a FACT. Nothing wrong with challenging an election. This challenge is not conspiracy it is completely out in the open.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See that title? That is a FACT. Nothing wrong with challenging an election. This challenge is not conspiracy it is completely out in the open.
See that title? That is a FACT. Nothing wrong with challenging an election. This challenge is not conspiracy it is completely out in the open.
Trump didn't do any of that.Nothing wrong with challenging an election using legal means. Forged election documents, threats against officials and an attempting to prevent an official election proceeding isn't legal.
Trump didn't do any of that.
What does that tell you? They do not want anyone to know Lake has a case. I cannot understand why Maricopa proving they did their job is so fucking difficult for them.Not seeing a whisper of this happening. And I'm search every media outlet in Arizona.
So? The congress has intervened in other close Presidential elections. You're ignorant of history. That's how this should have been handled, not in the courts.Which part? The forged election docs? Oh, Trump's co-conspirators are already signing like canaries that it was Trump's campaign that lead that effort. And NARA has them all. You can download and look at the forged and fraudulent election docs right now.
Threats against officials? The secretary of state of Georgia says otherwise.
And Trump's own attorney admitted that Trump chose to try and stop the elector counting in congress as his course of action.
"What President Trump said is: Let’s go with option D, let’s just halt, let’s just pause the voting and allow the state legislatures to take one last look and make a determination as to whether or not the elections were handled fairly."
So, um.......good luck with denying any of that happened.
LOL. So Kari Lake is tweeting about nothing hoping she'll be given an audience....that's not the way it works.What does that tell you? They do not want anyone to know Lake has a case. I cannot understand why Maricopa proving they did their job is so fucking difficult for them.
So? The congress has intervened in other close Presidential elections. You're ignorant of history. That's how this should have been handled, not in the courts.
The popular vote in many states were very close. What did President Trump say that was a threat?This wasn't close. Biden won by 74 electoral votes. It was a landslide victory.
The States had clearly made their selections: Biden's electors by a ratio of 306 to 232. The electoral college had ALREADY VOTED. Trump's campaign conspired to create forged and fraudulent election documents that falsely claimed that the people that signed that forged doc had been elected by the State as electors.
The States said otherwise.
Trump directly called and threatened the Secretary of State of Georgia. Says who? The Secretary of State of Georgia.
Trump's allies tracked down and threatened election workers. Says who? The election workers.
Trump's own attorney admitted that Trump explicitly chose to try and stop an official election proceeding.
None of that is legal.
The popular vote in many states were very close. What did President Trump say that was a threat?
79 of those electoral votes were stolen. True story.This wasn't close. Biden won by 74 electoral votes. It was a landslide victory.
The States had clearly made their selections: Biden's electors by a ratio of 306 to 232. The electoral college had ALREADY VOTED. Trump's campaign conspired to create forged and fraudulent election documents that falsely claimed that the people that signed that forged doc had been elected by the State as electors.
The States said otherwise.
Trump directly called and threatened the Secretary of State of Georgia. Says who? The Secretary of State of Georgia.
Trump's allies tracked down and threatened election workers. Says who? The election workers.
Trump's own attorney admitted that Trump explicitly chose to try and stop an official election proceeding.
None of that is legal.
The popular vote in many states were very close. What did President Trump say that was a threat?
How do you win the state? Not with electoral votes but the popular vote. Dum dum.The electoral vote was NOT.
And that was what Trump attempted to subvert with his forged and fraudulent election documents. His threates against officials. His allies threats against election workers. Trump's own attempt to halt an offficial election proceeding counting the ELECTORAL votes, even after the the electoral college had already met.
None of that was legal.
How do you win the state? Not with electoral votes but the popular vote. Dum dum.
You still haven't told us what was said that you claim is a threat. Go ahead.
Blah blah blah. Tell us what President Trump said that you claim is a threat.The States was already selected their electors. The electoral college had already voted.
Again, this was an attempt to use fraud, forgery, threats and deciept to try and halt an official election proceeding.
None of which is legal. And Trump's attorney already publicly admitted that Trump was trying to halt the official election proceeding.
Its a very strong case against Trump. Which is why the grand jury indicted.
And she still won’t be governor not to mention her antics have ruined any shot she would have at being elected a Senator next yearSee that title? That is a FACT. Nothing wrong with challenging an election. This challenge is not conspiracy it is completely out in the open.
Blah blah blah. Tell us what President Trump said that you claim is a threat.