Jan. 6th, The Law, and Nancy Pelosi's Dereliction of Duty

Very very interesting her communications weren't subject to the J6 investigation....even after Super Republican, Liz Cheney promised they would be.
We need Pelosi's communications, email, text, and phone calls. There is no reason not to record the politicians every move.

Jan. 6th was not a riot. Not even close. I am looking at these pictures and it is clear, they are not rioting. Sure, there are little pushing matches with the police. But it is not a riot.
 
Exactly. He’s so all over the place (intentionally) that it’s hard to figure out what he’s actually saying

That’s a strategy
No, the strategy is that you people cried like petulant children who basically had your baby rattlers taken when Trump became president in 2016. Then out of your mouths for 4 year's you Democrat's bragged and boasted about taking Trump down, and that he wasn't a legitimate president and on and on and on it went.

If anyone is guilty of sedition, the leftist Democrat's who were involved in overthrowing a president, and ultimately overthrowing the nation, probably fit the profile better than anyone at this point.

So when are the true villains going to step forward in order to make their intentions known (along with the agenda), that they have been hard at since the 1960s ???
 
No, the strategy is that you people cried like petulant children who basically had your baby rattlers taken when Trump became president in 2016. Then out of your mouths for 4 year's you Democrat's bragged and boasted about taking Trump down, and that he wasn't a legitimate president and on and on and on it went.

If anyone is guilty of sedition, the leftist Democrat's who were involved in overthrowing a president, and ultimately overthrowing the nation, probably fit the profile better than anyone at this point.

So when are the true villains going to step forward in order to make their intentions known (along with the agenda), that they have been hard at since the 1960s ???
Whining bitch
 
Not when you get into legal definitions and the structure of government. The police have a job to do, protect, police, do the best they can. But who is responsible, legally, as defined by law. By appointments, the elected officials that oversee the police.

The Capitol Police, are responsible for one thing, to police and protect. Legally that is different then being responsible for the security of congress which entails much more than policing.

The Capitol Police are not responsible to write the laws, that provide the security of the Capitol bld and grounds.

A subtle difference? We witnessed the Capitol Police being unable to protect the entire Capitol. It is obvious to me, someone else failed in there responsibility.

Congress is responsible to write laws that provides security, creates a force, that polices. Security of the Legislative branch of our government is so much more than just the Capitol Police Chief.

If the police are responsible, then the board they report to are responsible, and the committees the board report to are responsible, and if the board is responsible, then who they report to is responsible, that makes the president of the United States responsible, the Speaker of the House responsible, the Senate president responsible.

Congress is responsible, they write the laws, they appropriate the money. Money, who writes the check is responsible. The laws that authorize alarms that secure the capitol building. Laws that create intelligence committees that warn of danger.

Legally, in lawyer speak, police are responsible to police.

How come people here don't point out that the Capitol Police Board reports to the President of the USA?
 

Forum List

Back
Top