FBI tampering with Mar A Lago evidence?

[Delldude]

But since you don’t understand any of this, you really aren’t making any decisions on any info.

Great....you hold that thought.

 

[Marener]

Great....you hold that thought.

I don't understand your attempt to start a thread about something you don't understand and can't discuss.

 

[Delldude]

I don't understand your attempt to start a thread about something you don't understand and can't discuss.

And you do?

 

[Marener]

And you do?

Better than you.

The defense is trying to nit-pick anything possible, but its an inconsequential error. A nit-pick.

 

[Delldude]

Better than you.

The defense is trying to nit-pick anything possible, but its an inconsequential error. A nit-pick.

And it will be exploited to create an impression of reasonable doubt.

That's what they're paid to do.

'If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit.'

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Good Luck Sir.

What an apocryphal, superfluous waste of bandwidth.

Could it be because you have no counter-argument?

Naaaaah.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

They were protecting national defense information as you would expect the government to do by law.

This is nothing and a desperate attempt by fringe Twitter weirdos to make the low information people think this isn’t legit.

For a second I thought Blaster had lost his mind.

Wrong kitty.

 

[Marener]

And it will be exploited to create an impression of reasonable doubt.

That's what they're paid to do.

'If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit.'

How?

That's right. You don't have any idea what you're talking about so you don't know.

But you believe none the less.

 

[Delldude]

How?

That's right. You don't have any idea what you're talking about so you don't know.

But you believe none the less.

You're the one reaching..............not I...........................

 

[Marener]

You're the one reaching..............not I...........................

So what doubt does this create?

 

[Delldude]

So what doubt does this create?

Does or could?

 

[Marener]

Does or could?

Either.

Just lay it out why as to why this matters.

 

[Delldude]

Either.

Just lay it out why as to why this matters.

It only has to matter to the juries perception of the defense argument.

 

[Marener]

It only has to matter to the juries perception of the defense argument.

What perception might the jury going to get from this argument?

 

[RhodyPatriot]

It only has to matter to the juries perception of the defense argument.

It won't even matter if the jury finds him guilty.

It's all a show that nobody is buying the tickets to except the most TDS addled dipshits this side of the internet.

 

[Delldude]

What perception might the jury going to get from this argument?

How long do you plan on chasing your tail?

 

[citygator]

Rule #13 on USMB: Any original post titled as a question is always answered “No”. Never fails.

 

[Marener]

How long do you plan on chasing your tail?

Not sure what you mean. You're being evasive.

 

[Oddball]

Evidence tampering? The Biden regime and Jack Smith just fessed up to messing with boxes of Mar-a-Lago 'classified' docs.. - Revolver News

When will Jack Smith be arrested?

revolver.news

 

[Winco]

What an apocryphal, superfluous waste of bandwidth.

Could it be because you have no counter-argument?

Naaaaah.

My argument......Trump has committed crimes, and now he finally faces a jury.
He illegally took Classified Documents, and is claiming he can "Declassify" by just thinking about it, even after leaving office. NOPE. Illegal.

Dear Lord...... Get off the POS trump train.

Julie Kelly......LOLOLLLLOOL a bitch looking to make a name in MAGA World.
Post #2.

Please share RhodyPatriot why you actually believe trump has not committed a crime..........We all wait to LAUGH at you.....Well except the CULT.