- Jun 4, 2011
- 33,597
- 7,094
- 1,130
We couldn't pry you off his dick.....I think he wanted his term to end to get people like you off of it.Still triggered by Obama huh?
He's been a private citizen for what...6 years now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We couldn't pry you off his dick.....I think he wanted his term to end to get people like you off of it.Still triggered by Obama huh?
He's been a private citizen for what...6 years now?
As if his perjury in front of Congress and obstruction of justice, abuses of power weren't enough.Save the time and money.
View attachment 669332
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland could face impeachment proceedings over the Department of Justice’s failure to enforce a federal statute that prevents picketing or parading outside of Supreme Court Justices’ homes, should Republicans take the majority in the House of Representatives in the midterm elections.
A.G. Garland May Face Impeachment over Protests at Justices' Homes if GOP Takes House
Republicans may impeach A.G. Merrick Garland over the DOJ's failure to stop protests at SCOTUS Justices' homes, should the GOP take Congress.www.breitbart.com
It has to do with intimidation (obstruction).Protesting Outside of Supreme Court Justices' Homes is Fine, Actually | EarthRights International
The mere fact that direct action causes discomfort does not render it violent, and a large group of protestors gathers is not threatening.earthrights.org
Yes, but how do you convict and remove?Impeachment belongs to the House.
Protesting Outside of Supreme Court Justices' Homes is Fine, Actually | EarthRights International
The mere fact that direct action causes discomfort does not render it violent, and a large group of protestors gathers is not threatening.earthrights.org
but that isnt impeachment.Yes, but how do you convict and remove?
with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty
18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Yeah. Really hard to arrest someone standing on a sidewalk screaming at a house.Impossible to enforce. You can say that protesting a ruling is trying to influence something and protesters can simply say they are protesting a ruling.
There are protests outside the Supreme Court all the time.
Yeah. Really hard to arrest someone standing on a sidewalk screaming at a house.
True but why do what Democrats do?but that isnt impeachment.
Republicans are retards. What do you expect?True but why do what Democrats do?
Lie-bertarians & Turd Party Types who vote Democommie are also ?Republicans are retards. What do you expect?
duh! lolLie-bertarians & Turd Party Types who vote Democommie are also ?
So are Democommies then ???duh! lol
My 6 month old puppy is smarter than 90% of demsSo are Democommies then ???