Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by JimBowie1958, May 25, 2017.
Not sure why; administrative costs would go down by more than that.
well two things would change right off the bat
the federal/state workforce that over sees it would be cut way back
and the major recipients would lose more then have of the s they get now
why assume the second part? Unemployment compensation could be fixed at fourteen dollars an hour; there would no need for a statutory minimum wage on employers.
why assume the second part? Unemployment compensation could be fixed at fourteen dollars an hour
at that point that is all gone
13 grand is the max benefit
exceptions apply to the disabled and medical fragile
but that is a small percent of recipients
there is an upper limit that you can "earn"
before the 13 grand is cut off as well
Only for that program; which, is better for persons who truly need welfare; Because, capital must circulate, regardless under Any form of Capitalism.
Zucky is plotting his run at the Presidency. A universal income is just a subterfuge to buy votes.
I think Mrs. Clinton would have been president, if she had run on that platform, as well.
Only for that program
under plans like he suggests the whole welfare system is taken down
food stamps-housing- unemployment - tanf - gone
you get 13 grand as a base to live off of
exception being for a very limited number of truly needy people
Why that much emphasis on equality over need?
it is not equality at all
it is the basic income folks can operate on
if they want to advance themselves
then take on a job
the cutoff i have seen before the 13 grand drops off
is around 35 grand a year
Separate names with a comma.