Younger Earth: 4.4 Billion Years?

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by JBeukema, Jul 13, 2010.

  1. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,706
    A Legit “Young Earth” Theory: Our Planet May Be Only 4.4 Billion Years Old | 80beats | Discover Magazine
     
  2. Dante
    Offline

    Dante On leave Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    52,463
    Thanks Received:
    3,326
    Trophy Points:
    1,825
    Location:
    On leave
    Ratings:
    +6,071

    Is this you admitting most 'young' Earth theories are illegitimate?


    “If correct, [this model] would mean the Earth was about 100 million years in the making altogether,” Dr. Rudge said. “We estimate that makes it about 4.467 billion years old–a mere youngster compared with the 4.537 billion-year-old planet we had previously imagined.” [BBC]
     
  3. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,706

    'Admitting'?


    Huh?
     
  4. froggy
    Offline

    froggy Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    9,336
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,272
    The age of the planet is nothing more than a guess, or theory What do they have that they know is over 4 mill. years old to compare it to?
     
  5. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,426
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,630
    What's a merely 70 million years out of 4,000 million years?

    These are scientific wild assed guesses, anyway.
     
  6. Douger
    Offline

    Douger BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,323
    Thanks Received:
    915
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Not fucking there !
    Ratings:
    +918
    Right/ Your future pResident, Shrieking Sarah, has already declared it to be 6 thousand years old.:cuckoo:
    I s'pose this Nazi would agree.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jul 13, 2010
  7. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    86,031
    Thanks Received:
    15,792
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +44,271
    I read somewhere that time might have decelerated since the beginning of the Universe
     
  8. G.T.
    Offline

    G.T. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    54,202
    Thanks Received:
    8,395
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    out
    Ratings:
    +34,675
    Time itself decelerated? Time is relative.
     
  9. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    86,031
    Thanks Received:
    15,792
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +44,271
    Right.

    But the unit of measure of a second here on Earth might not necessarily have been the same unit in the past.
     
  10. G.T.
    Offline

    G.T. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    54,202
    Thanks Received:
    8,395
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    out
    Ratings:
    +34,675
    The only way that's possible is if the Earth was at one point a different size and had a different Gravitational force.
     

Share This Page