Only if you refuse to check spending. Most of us don't spend what we don't have. I keep forgeting it's the hysterical, thieving lefties who are talking.
It would be a lot easier to take those claims seriously if spending were actually cut. Of course, it doesn't really happen, because the Republicans aren't going to cut defense spending for ideological reasons and they're not going to cut Social Security benefits or slash Medicare service because that'll piss off old people, and by the time you've eliminated all of those as areas for possible cuts, that's over three-fourths of the budget.
We'd sure as shit eliminate a lot of spending on welfare, however. That's something you all won't discuss. We'd also eliminate a lot of frou-frou crap, and cut the chains of industry. Something you also won't discuss.
In the FY 2009 budget submitted by President Bush (without taking into account TARP and other programs passed later), you could completely gut the departments of Education and HUD and cut unemployment benefits, other forms of welfare, Medicaid, and SCHIP in half, and you'd still be left with a deficit.