You should only vote if you can distinguish Obama from Romney

Discussion in 'Election Forums' started by VoteForTheDucks, Oct 28, 2012.

  1. Thunderbird
    Offline

    Thunderbird Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,369
    Thanks Received:
    358
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +1,136
    So unborn babies should not be killed at whim?

    Only a moron would think that subservience to the abortion industry makes you pro-woman.

    1) Planned Parenthood, which receives 100s of millions of taxpayer dollars, lies to women. If you really care about choice you don't lie to the one making the decision.

    Planned ParenthoodÂ’s use of unscientific and fabricated medical information

    2) Just a few of the women chewed up by the abortion industry:

    New 911 tape reveals botched abortion at Virginia Planned Parenthood

    Authorities: Abortion doctors charged with murder

    16-Year-Old Girl Suffered Botched Abortion at Planned Parenthood

    DA: West Philadelphia abortion doctor killed 7 babies with scissors

    The abortion industry, like many industries, has captured the regulatory apparatus. Legalization means mistreatment of women and a huge expansion of the industry.

    For example: Lax state oversight results in widespread violations at Michigan abortion providers, report says

    3) The abortion industry represents the greatest assault on women in human history. Tens of millions of unborn baby girls have been killed for the "crime" of being a girl!

    Sex-Selection Abortion: A War on Baby Girls

    4) Not a few abortions are forced on women.

    Pregnant Woman Threatened & Assaulted for Refusing Abortion

    Why it's The UnChoice
    Most abortions are unwanted or coerced, many forced. Women are dying, too. Human rights abuse misrepresented as "choice."

    And many rich people & bigots are eager to pressure working women & women of color into killing off their future.

    5) The abortion industry just wants more abortions. They have no problem endangering women's health.

    Planned Parenthood pushes California bill to let non-physicians conduct abortions
     
  2. George Costanza
    Offline

    George Costanza A Friendly Liberal

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    5,184
    Thanks Received:
    1,088
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Los Angeles area.
    Ratings:
    +1,192
    When it comes to taxing the rich and big business, Republicans are all for "smaller government," code for - lower taxes for the rich and big business. When it come to imposing their religious views on the rest of the population, they have no problem at all with bigger government.
     
  3. Thunderbird
    Offline

    Thunderbird Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,369
    Thanks Received:
    358
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +1,136
    Of course Obama is as much a tool of the plutocrats as anybody.

    Do you mean when secular and religious citizens work to protect the fundamental rights of unborn babies?
     
  4. Uncensored2008
    Online

    Uncensored2008 Libertarian Radical Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    64,692
    Thanks Received:
    8,288
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Behind the Orange Curtain
    Ratings:
    +28,654
    Obama would say, "you have a vagina, no need to engage the brain, let men take care of that."

    [​IMG]

    Gay men have such contempt for women.
     
  5. JWBooth
    Offline

    JWBooth Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    6,808
    Thanks Received:
    1,554
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Location:
    Fredonia Republic
    Ratings:
    +1,962
    [​IMG]
     
  6. Uncensored2008
    Online

    Uncensored2008 Libertarian Radical Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    64,692
    Thanks Received:
    8,288
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Behind the Orange Curtain
    Ratings:
    +28,654
    "Vote with your vagina, honey. Don't try and think." Barack Obama - to America's women.
     
  7. George Costanza
    Offline

    George Costanza A Friendly Liberal

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    5,184
    Thanks Received:
    1,088
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Los Angeles area.
    Ratings:
    +1,192
    I meant EXACTLY what I said. Don't try to sugar coat it.
     
  8. George Costanza
    Offline

    George Costanza A Friendly Liberal

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    5,184
    Thanks Received:
    1,088
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Los Angeles area.
    Ratings:
    +1,192
    Idiot.
     
  9. Uncensored2008
    Online

    Uncensored2008 Libertarian Radical Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    64,692
    Thanks Received:
    8,288
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Behind the Orange Curtain
    Ratings:
    +28,654
    Yes Obama is. But mostly he's a gay man, with utter contempt for women.
     
  10. toomuchtime_
    Offline

    toomuchtime_ Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    8,926
    Thanks Received:
    1,271
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +4,764
    Governor Romney has provided all the numbers necessary to reach his goal of reducing the deficit by $500,000,000 a year by the end of his first term: a cap on tax deductions, a 5% across the board cut on non security discretionary spending and a plan to raise the growth rate of real GDP for Obama's anemic 1.65%, down from 2.5% two years ago, to 4%. The reason you continue to be confused is that you don't understand the argument you are trying to make. Obama and you claim that if you don't value Romney's across the board 5% cut on non security discretionary spending or his plan to raise the growth rate of real GDP by 4% a year, the math doesn't work, but if you ignore these things, you are not talking about Governor Romney's plan. Your problem clearly is not with Governor Romney's tax plan; you problem is that you've been punked by Obama.

    First of all, Obama's $5 trillion number is bogus. He claims to have gotten it from the Tax Policy Center's analysis, but they claimed the Romney tax cuts, under which they included the Bush tax cuts he would maintain, would cost about $4.8 trillion. Further they stated it was impossible at that time to determine how much the rest of Romney's plan would offset this cost; for example, they stated that limiting deductions alone would produce additional revenues of between $1.3 trillion and $2 trillion depending on what the limits eventually were.

    Second, the Tax Policy Center did not evaluate the savings that would come from Romney's plan for an across the board 5% cut on non security discretionary spending. In the first two years in office, Obama increased non security discretionary spending by nearly 25%, proposing over $134 billion in new spending for 2011 alone, and rolling back this spending to 2008 levels would save at least another $1 trillion.

    The wild card in Romney's plan is the effect of his promised 4% a year growth in real GDP for which he has outlined his plan. No one can reasonably estimate how Romney's plan for reviving the slumping Obama economy will effect tax revenues, but by the above analysis it would have to raise an additional $1.7 trillion to $2.5 trillion over a decade or $170 billion to $250 billion a year to prevent the deficit from increasing, and when one considers that the Bush tax cuts allowed President Bush to collect substantially more in personal income tax receipts over Clinton, $7.37 trillion for Bush to $5.66 trillion for Clinton, it is reasonable to expect Romney's tax cuts along with his plans for reviving the slowing Obama economy will produce not only enough additional revenues to keep the deficit from increasing but enough to meet his goal of reducing the deficit by $500 million a year by the end of his first term.
     

Share This Page