You Have Only Two Rights

Discussion in 'US Constitution' started by Buck111, Jul 15, 2017 at 12:44 PM.

  1. Buck111
    Offline

    Buck111 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2016
    Messages:
    781
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    70
    Location:
    On the big blue marble
    Ratings:
    +317
    Under the laws of nature you have but two rights: The right to not be harmed in your person or your property and the right to defend your person and your property.

    You also have these obligations: To cause no harm to other persons and their property or to the innocent beings of this planet, including the planet itself.

    No bills of rights, no constitutions and no governments can change these basic concepts. All government and its constitutions serve to do is confuse and conflagulate, distract and manipulate. Writs on paper do not grant nor protect rights. Writs on paper serve only those who wrote them
     
  2. Xelor
    Offline

    Xelor Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2017
    Messages:
    4,902
    Thanks Received:
    660
    Trophy Points:
    210
    Location:
    D.C.
    Ratings:
    +2,416
    Nature does not accord the right not to be harmed. The predator-prey dynamic demonstrates that in as palpable a way as can be done.
     
  3. Buck111
    Offline

    Buck111 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2016
    Messages:
    781
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    70
    Location:
    On the big blue marble
    Ratings:
    +317
    The prey has the right to defend against the predator. Birds often violently defend their nests from cats. Mice defend themselves by building homes the predator cannot enter.
     
  4. Xelor
    Offline

    Xelor Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2017
    Messages:
    4,902
    Thanks Received:
    660
    Trophy Points:
    210
    Location:
    D.C.
    Ratings:
    +2,416
    That they do, but that would the be the right to defend oneself, not the right not to be harmed/attacked.

    Also, I'm not of a mind that an instinctual behavior as essential as self-preservation is a right. It's merely what one does; it's a behavior. Right or no right, creatures are going to do what they can to ensure their existence.
     
  5. Buck111
    Offline

    Buck111 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2016
    Messages:
    781
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    70
    Location:
    On the big blue marble
    Ratings:
    +317
    My original post reflects the rights of human beings. My post in reply to your previous post was an example of how animals protect themselves from harm since your post was basic 'predator and prey'. Do animals have a 'right' to not be eaten? No. To they have a right not to be harmed? In some cases. Animals rarely kill solely for the sake of killing. They kill to eat or to protect. Those are their natural instincts. They are also basic instincts of men. To go outside those instincts is to cause undo harm.

    "...creatures are going to do what they can to ensure their existence."
    The right to exist stems from the right not to be harmed.

    When a bird protects its nest from a cat that bird is exercising its right not to be harmed.
     
  6. Bleipriester
    Online

    Bleipriester Freedom!

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2012
    Messages:
    15,534
    Thanks Received:
    1,041
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Bazidonien
    Ratings:
    +3,919
    Nonsense. Birds and mice are being attacked and eaten without lightnings strafing the predators. This is what makes our civilization different from the law of the jungle. Civilization does not appear from nothing, it is an achievement that actively must be protected. The day on which the weak are declared prey is the day on which civilization ends. The most brutal and reckless will prevail and humankind will degenerate to animals.
     
  7. Xelor
    Offline

    Xelor Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2017
    Messages:
    4,902
    Thanks Received:
    660
    Trophy Points:
    210
    Location:
    D.C.
    Ratings:
    +2,416
    Your OP speaks of rights accorded by nature. If one is going to take about natural rights, one must dispense with considerations accruing from constructs humanity have established. One of those things is the notion of civilization and all that comes with it.

    That's a desire, not a right.
     

Share This Page