You F-ing Racists Suck. Just sayin'

[Gunny]

 

[elvis]

Who does Zona suck on? Bass?

 

[Luissa]

WTF is it tonight?

Are you a racist, if you just hate people in general?

 

[elvis]

WTF is it tonight?

Are you a racist, if you just hate people in general?

you'll have to ask Zona if it hates people in general.

 

[Luissa]

WTF is it tonight?

Are you a racist, if you just hate people in general?

you'll have to ask Zona if it hates people in general.

I don't talk to Zona!

 

[elvis]

WTF is it tonight?

Are you a racist, if you just hate people in general?

you'll have to ask Zona if it hates people in general.

I don't talk to Zona!

then you'll never know the answer to your question.

 

[eagleseven]

In general, they do.

 

[Gunny]

WTF is it tonight?

Are you a racist, if you just hate people in general?

You're quick. How about racists?

 

[Gunny]

WTF is it tonight?

Are you a racist, if you just hate people in general?

you'll have to ask Zona if it hates people in general.

Don't tell me Mr Lefttard is a racist because we KNOW racists don't exist on the left. The MSM and any leftwingnut can tell you THAT.

 

[Luissa]

WTF is it tonight?

Are you a racist, if you just hate people in general?

You're quick. How about racists?

And you are an ass!

I was joking, Nancy Boy!

 

[Gunny]

WTF is it tonight?

Are you a racist, if you just hate people in general?

You're quick. How about racists?

And you are an ass!

I was joking, Nancy Boy!

Well, considering your question ....

 

[Luissa]

You're quick. How about racists?

And you are an ass!

I was joking, Nancy Boy!

Well, considering your question ....

Talk to the

 

[William Joyce]

Definition of a racist:

Someone who's winning an argument with a liberal

 

[xotoxi]

rac⋅ism /ˈreɪ

sɪz

əm/
–noun
1.a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

Origin:
1865–70; < F racisme. See race, -ism

Related forms:
racist, noun, adjective

Fig 1. A racist

 

[Sarah G]

Definition of a racist:

Someone who's winning an argument with a liberal

How would you know, you've never won one...

 

[William Joyce]

1.a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

Congressional Black Caucus?

La Raza?

Israel?

 

[xotoxi]

1.a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

Congressional Black Caucus?

La Raza?

Israel?

Do you follow the "Two Wrongs Make A Right" Doctrine?

 

[B L Zeebub]

Definition of a racist:

Someone who's winning an argument with a liberal

your not a racist then

 

[William Joyce]

1.a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

Congressional Black Caucus?

La Raza?

Israel?

Do you follow the "Two Wrongs Make A Right" Doctrine?

No, the Universal Nationalism Doctrine.

Every racial or ethnic group seeking to direct its own destiny unmolested by other groups -- and without making demands on other groups -- shall have that right.

I only point out things like Israel and the CBC to show the hypocrisy whites' current situation. They are, as Shelby Steele wrote in the Wall Street Journal, the only group of people who aren't even allowed to THINK of themselves as a distinct group, much less organize for political power.

That's WRONG.

Even if you think it's wrong, how long do you think the current state of affairs will hold?

It's UNSUSTAINABLE.

Things have changed. Whites are rapidly becoming a minority in the U.S. and the rest of the West. In California, they already are.

Yet our current discourse discounts them as a group COMPLETELY.

We are still "the bad guys" when we're mentioned, if at all. But we aren't any more or less bad than any other group. We have rights.

The truth about Life on Earth is that the most natural groupings of humans for happy, healthy -- and dare I say PROGRESSIVE -- life is "racially homogenous." No, not hermetically sealed. Not without cultural exchange. Not without trade and travel. But with the default position of allowing humans to group as they do.

Multiculturalism and race-denial are bigger failures than even communism. They DO NOT WORK. The evidence is all around us. State-imposed "diversity" is a crock of shit.

Yet only whites are accused of being "racist" is they even point that out.

Again, that wrong. It's got to change.

 

[uptownlivin90]

Congressional Black Caucus?

La Raza?

Israel?

Do you follow the "Two Wrongs Make A Right" Doctrine?

No, the Universal Nationalism Doctrine.

Every racial or ethnic group seeking to direct its own destiny unmolested by other groups -- and without making demands on other groups -- shall have that right.

I only point out things like Israel and the CBC to show the hypocrisy whites' current situation. They are, as Shelby Steele wrote in the Wall Street Journal, the only group of people who aren't even allowed to THINK of themselves as a distinct group, much less organize for political power.

That's WRONG.

Even if you think it's wrong, how long do you think the current state of affairs will hold?

It's UNSUSTAINABLE.

Things have changed. Whites are rapidly becoming a minority in the U.S. and the rest of the West. In California, they already are.

Yet our current discourse discounts them as a group COMPLETELY.

We are still "the bad guys" when we're mentioned, if at all. But we aren't any more or less bad than any other group. We have rights.

The truth about Life on Earth is that the most natural groupings of humans for happy, healthy -- and dare I say PROGRESSIVE -- life is "racially homogenous." No, not hermetically sealed. Not without cultural exchange. Not without trade and travel. But with the default position of allowing humans to group as they do.

Multiculturalism and race-denial are bigger failures than even communism. They DO NOT WORK. The evidence is all around us. State-imposed "diversity" is a crock of shit.

Yet only whites are accused of being "racist" is they even point that out.

Again, that wrong. It's got to change.

Multiculturalism is the only form of governance that insures liberty and works to perserve personal freedoms, which is why I never caught on with the "ethnic nationalism" bullshit. Ethnic nationalism in any form is a serious danger to civil liberties and the rights of the individual. Within every "ethnic nationalist" movement there is always a hint of socialism, fascism, and totalitarianism. This in order to have an ethnic nationalist movement you must persuade the members of your ethnic/racial group that they are better off operating as a unified force rather than as individuals.

Most modern "ethnic nations" have had socialist influences and get their ideas from Darwin, Marx, Hitler, Stalin, etc. In matter of fact fascism almost depends on ethnic nationalism. When the government is turned into a body who's sole interest is to protect the "collective" interests of a specific race, you've got fascism. Simple as that. I don't believe in fascism, don't believe it works, haven't seen any evidence that "ethnic nationalism" works any better then multiculturalism, and I can tell you that multiculturalism works best under a state that respects the rights of individuals.