Except todays "science" is a closed society. You walk in step with the religion or you dont get to publish. Your data doesnt match the data of the annointed? See ya............
Think about a Baptist person trying to publish something in Tehran. I rest............
Your data must be supported by the observations of what is occurring in reality. Because if it is being pulled out of your backside it may get rejected. At least I would hope so.
Yes our understanding of the climate system is not good enough to accurately predict the exact raise in temperatures of the planet, but that is what science does...It expands our understanding of what is around us. If not for it we wouldn't have a billionth the understanding that we do.
Is the temperature stations perfect. No. There is a error in some of them of .05c within the giss for this. But it is better then having nothing and we are looking at the trend.
That is certainly what real science does. What exactly have the climatologists added to the body of knowledge in the last 12 years that is actually significant? We've invested over 60 billion dollars in the last 12 years. What exactly have we gotten for that investment?
we would be much further ahead if that money had been spent to produce data that was used to produce theories that deal with natural causes rather than just hammering round data into a square CO2 hole time after time. look at how so many ideas are distorted to show catastrophic global warming.
