Ernie S.
Diamond Member
And how did the people feel about that election in retrospect?
They fucking hate your party
YOU hate our party and you are not "people". In fact I doubt you are even sentient.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And how did the people feel about that election in retrospect?
They fucking hate your party
Because Obama can't go back in time and implement policies in 2008. Furthermore the money is saved over the course of 10 yeras of which this year has savingsWhy is it Obama is saving us money ten years from now and not in the present?
And how did the people feel about that election in retrospect?
They fucking hate your party
YOU hate our party and you are not "people". In fact I doubt you are even sentient.
And how did the people feel about that election in retrospect?
They fucking hate your party
YOU hate our party and you are not "people". In fact I doubt you are even sentient.
what is the approval rating of your republican house in the nation?
Because Obama can't go back in time and implement policies in 2008. Furthermore the money is saved over the course of 10 yeras of which this year has savingsWhy is it Obama is saving us money ten years from now and not in the present?
2008? Oh you mean policies enacted when the DNC controlled both houses of Congress? Here ya go!
A graph of unemployment vs party in control of Congress.
I'd appreciate comments from you and TDM.
They do. But they don't support tax cuts that eh GOP wants because the GOP wants to give tax cuts to international corporations and billionaires
so plz come back when you have a clue
We have the highest corporate tax rates in the world. Obviously, the way to grow the economy is to make them even higher. Obviously.
See this is the problem. You are so ignorant that you think the earth is flat and yet you call anyone who says the earth isn't flat that they are cuckoo
Two-Thirds of Corporations Pay No Taxes, But McCain Still Wants To Lower the Corporate Tax Rate | ThinkProgress
Error - washingtonpost.com
^United states corporate tax revenue is half that of the OCED average.
You would have to increase USA corporate taxes by 100% in America for the USA to have corporate taxes equal to the OCED average.
Reality Check: Effective U.S. Corporate Tax Rate Much Lower Than Most Other Developed Nations | ThinkProgress
^United states has one of the lower corporate tax rates in the 1st world
26 Major Corporations Paid No Taxes For The Last Four Years
^From 2008-2011 the 30 largest corporations paid a negative income taxes despite having 205billion in profits
We have the highest corporate tax rates in the world. Obviously, the way to grow the economy is to make them even higher. Obviously.
See this is the problem. You are so ignorant that you think the earth is flat and yet you call anyone who says the earth isn't flat that they are cuckoo
Two-Thirds of Corporations Pay No Taxes, But McCain Still Wants To Lower the Corporate Tax Rate | ThinkProgress
Error - washingtonpost.com
^United states corporate tax revenue is half that of the OCED average.
You would have to increase USA corporate taxes by 100% in America for the USA to have corporate taxes equal to the OCED average.
Reality Check: Effective U.S. Corporate Tax Rate Much Lower Than Most Other Developed Nations | ThinkProgress
^United states has one of the lower corporate tax rates in the 1st world
26 Major Corporations Paid No Taxes For The Last Four Years
^From 2008-2011 the 30 largest corporations paid a negative income taxes despite having 205billion in profits
Funny thing, the federal government is not in the habit of giving corporations refunds unless then pay taxes in the first place. Showing a chart of the companies that got refunds from overpaying taxes, which often takes years to work through the bureaucracy of the IRS, and then claiming this proves they did not pay taxes on the profits, only makes people look stupid. It makes for great soundbites on the campaign trail, but only an idiot would actually believe it.
post one study or anaylsisi that shows the stimulus did nothing. GIvent hat there are zero I await your non-response..
Want to bet?
No Such Thing as Shovel Ready | Mercatus
Did Stimulus Dollars Hire the Unemployed? | Mercatus
See this is part of the problem you think a survey that shows that the stimulus that states "hiring workers isn't creating jobs" is a valid source. You think a survey that states "unemployment raised from 2008-2009 is a reflection on the stimulus act.
So come back when you have an actually study on the effects of the stimulus
Bring me a study that doesn't state "hiring workers doesn't create jobs"
See this is part of the problem you think a survey that shows that the stimulus that states "hiring workers isn't creating jobs" is a valid source. You think a survey that states "unemployment raised from 2008-2009 is a reflection on the stimulus act.
So come back when you have an actually study on the effects of the stimulus
You said I couldn't find a single study that said that the stimulus did not work, I found two, I have a lot more, all of them just as full of assumptions as the ones you can find that prove it did work
Like always you're wrong. The simple fact is that no one can conclusively prove that the stimulus worked or failed
This is the problem you hold ignorance and things like "hiring people does not create jobs" is equal to assumptions based on statistics and realityTrot out all the studies you like, the fact will remain they are based on assumptions, and that they can never actually be tested. The difference between us is I know that, and you will prefer to believe your position because you think you are right.
Economist's View: "Gauging the Benefits, Costs, and Sustainability of U.S. Stimulus"
Did the stimulus work? According to a collaboration between Fitch Ratings and Oxford economics, the answer is yes:
Government stimulus moves may have ended recession, by Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times: Without the unprecedented stimulus actions by the federal government triggered by the 2008 financial crisis, the Great Recession might still be going on, according to a study by Fitch Ratings. ...
The boost from those policies helped the nation's gross domestic product increase 3% in 2010 and 1.7% last year; absent the stimulus, the U.S. "might still be mired in a recession," according to the study, done in conjunction with Oxford Economics.
The U.S. economy would have seen little or no growth the last two years without the policies, the report says, and those actions appear "to have significantly softened the severity of the decline" in GDP in the year immediately after the recession ended in mid-2009.
Though the Fed's monetary policy actions were helpful, fiscal stimulus by Congress and the White House "had the strongest positive impact on consumption during the recent recovery," the study found.
Because Obama can't go back in time and implement policies in 2008. Furthermore the money is saved over the course of 10 yeras of which this year has savingsWhy is it Obama is saving us money ten years from now and not in the present?
Well then, you should be aboe to produce a link showing debt reduction. I'll wait.
, fiscal stimulus by Congress and the White House "had the strongest positive impact on consumption during the recent recovery," the study found.