Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And as this weeks Washington Post/ABC News poll showed, nearly 25 percent of Democrats now believe a return to Bushs policies would be good, a staggeringly high figure. As The Post reports:
Obama and the Democrats have argued that if Republicans were to gain control of Congress, they would return to the policies of President George W. Bush. Two-thirds of Democrats share that view and say it would be bad for the country. But almost a quarter of Democrats say a GOP-led Congress would take the country in a new and better direction or say a return to Bushs policies would be good.
The CNN poll is of course deeply humiliating for the White House, especially coming just three and a half weeks before the November mid-terms. George W. Bushs resurgence is in large part due to mounting opposition to the Obamas presidencys left-wing agenda, but it is also spurred by Obamas image as an out of touch, aloof and elitist president, divorced from economic and political reality on the ground.
Yes, President Bush, America does miss you.
September 2002
"With their trademark bravado, the Bush administration recast warmed-over or failed initiatives as sure bets. And for a while, the media, the public, and even some Democrats bought in. Today, however, its signature domestic accomplishment--the 2001 tax cut--seems destined to yield dividends of deficits and political fallout for years to come. When you look past the promises and the tough talk and the spin, you see an administration whose major policy initiatives are stalled or postponed to some unspecified point in the future. Until now, the Bush administration has been trading on the promise that all of these things would work out. But that leaves them in the position of a company that borrows against future profits (Enron, for instance) or an overextended investor who is buying stock on margin. When the bubble bursts, they will have a long way to fall."
And Mr. Shithead of course does not correlate that with the average beginning tax monies paid in by each income level.... showing that the richest still pay the highest amount and the highest rate... showing our overbloated government's support for selective equal treatment..
And he cites a biased article from a blogger as proof for his support of the selective equal treatment...
oh so typical... what next? a huffypuffy link??
"The hard, empirical facts:
The tax cuts did not spur investment. Job growth in the George W. Bush years was one-seventh that of the Clinton years."
Unemployment rate was 4% when president Bush took office, and it was 8.6% when he left office, and it is 9.6% now.
the unemployment conditions in this country MORE THAN DOUBLED, the previous 8 years, but it has only gone up by 1% under the Obama reign.(so far)
YES, 9.6% is too high, but so was 8.6%.
i don't miss President Bush.
Unemployment rate was 4% when president Bush took office, and it was 8.6% when he left office, and it is 9.6% now.
the unemployment conditions in this country MORE THAN DOUBLED, the previous 8 years, but it has only gone up by 1% under the Obama reign.(so far)
YES, 9.6% is too high, but so was 8.6%.
i don't miss President Bush.
Bullshit. Polls show Americans prefer Obama's economic policy over Boosh's. Americans also think the health reform bill didn't go far enough. The single factor for peoples anger is the unemployment numbers. What they fail to remember is, it was those very Bush policies that got us these unemployment numbers. Americans have memory-loss. They need to be reminded, if not for the Obama economic policies, we'd still be in the ditch, instead of climbing out of it. If McCain had been elected, things would be much, much worse.
July 10, 2008
"I know Gramm is McCain's "guy" because he helped rescue McCain's struggling presidential campaign last summer, but McCain, if he truly wants to fix the economy, needs to begin fixing the economic priorities of his own campaign first, and the people who are non-sensically purveying those priorities, before he's even able to attempt to fix the entire economy."
Unemployment rate was 4% when president Bush took office, and it was 8.6% when he left office, and it is 9.6% now.
the unemployment conditions in this country MORE THAN DOUBLED, the previous 8 years, but it has only gone up by 1% under the Obama reign.(so far)
YES, 9.6% is too high, but so was 8.6%.
i don't miss President Bush.
Of course, lets completely ignore the FACT that under Bush and Republican Congress the unemployment rate was under 5%. As soon as Dems took control of Congress it shot up through the roof.
Lets just ignore the facts so we can blame booooosh!!!
Unemployment rate was 4% when president Bush took office, and it was 8.6% when he left office, and it is 9.6% now.
the unemployment conditions in this country MORE THAN DOUBLED, the previous 8 years, but it has only gone up by 1% under the Obama reign.(so far)
YES, 9.6% is too high, but so was 8.6%.
i don't miss President Bush.
Those eight years set the stage for what is going on now, along with Reagan economics. It is not Obama's fault that we have been outsourcing all our jobs since the 1980's.
Unemployment rate was 4% when president Bush took office, and it was 8.6% when he left office, and it is 9.6% now.
the unemployment conditions in this country MORE THAN DOUBLED, the previous 8 years, but it has only gone up by 1% under the Obama reign.(so far)
YES, 9.6% is too high, but so was 8.6%.
i don't miss President Bush.
Of course, lets completely ignore the FACT that under Bush and Republican Congress the unemployment rate was under 5%. As soon as Dems took control of Congress it shot up through the roof.
Lets just ignore the facts so we can blame booooosh!!!
the hawk,
IF they were facts, I would not ignore them, but what you say...simply put, IS NOT FACT.
Care
Yes, President Bush, America does miss you Telegraph Blogs
We have to go overseas now for the truth from the media now that a Democrat is head thief.
And as this weeks Washington Post/ABC News poll showed, nearly 25 percent of Democrats now believe a return to Bushs policies would be good, a staggeringly high figure. As The Post reports:
Obama and the Democrats have argued that if Republicans were to gain control of Congress, they would return to the policies of President George W. Bush. Two-thirds of Democrats share that view and say it would be bad for the country. But almost a quarter of Democrats say a GOP-led Congress would take the country in a new and better direction or say a return to Bushs policies would be good.
The CNN poll is of course deeply humiliating for the White House, especially coming just three and a half weeks before the November mid-terms. George W. Bushs resurgence is in large part due to mounting opposition to the Obamas presidencys left-wing agenda, but it is also spurred by Obamas image as an out of touch, aloof and elitist president, divorced from economic and political reality on the ground.
Wow, missed this being hyped on CNN, of all sources.
Out sourcing is not our only problems....
We had a real estate boom BUBBLE, a fake boom....and we lived off of that FAKE bubble, and when it burst, the cards came tumbling down.
Bullshit. Polls show Americans prefer Obama's economic policy over Boosh's. Americans also think the health reform bill didn't go far enough. The single factor for peoples anger is the unemployment numbers. What they fail to remember is, it was those very Bush policies that got us these unemployment numbers. Americans have memory-loss. They need to be reminded, if not for the Obama economic policies, we'd still be in the ditch, instead of climbing out of it. If McCain had been elected, things would be much, much worse.
And Mr. Shithead of course does not correlate that with the average beginning tax monies paid in by each income level.... showing that the richest still pay the highest amount and the highest rate... showing our overbloated government's support for selective equal treatment..
And he cites a biased article from a blogger as proof for his support of the selective equal treatment...
oh so typical... what next? a huffypuffy link??Got up on the wrong-side-o'-the-crib, today, huh???
That graph is showing the present tax-rates; the BUSHCO-rates, Skippy!!
"The hard, empirical facts:
The tax cuts did not spur investment. Job growth in the George W. Bush years was one-seventh that of the Clinton years."
Run along, now......
