Ya Gotta Catch Reid On Dubai! Sour Puss! LOL

[rtwngAvngr]

They are for a sane look at the deal and the assurances that are built into the contract to assure our country's safety rather than the low brow, paranoid, simplistic, reactionary opinion based on no facts whatsoever. Michael Savage is known for that type of reaction and tends to make an ass of himself daily. What a bunch of chicken shits it makes us look like. I expect this lack of Capitalistic thought from Socialist and protectionist but not from those that say they are conservative.

The USA is projecting weakness to the rest of the world while anyone with the least amount of braincells understands that it would be much cheaper and easier to fly one of the two flights a day coming from the UAE to New York into whatever target they want. If the UAE is untrustworthy how can we allow them to inspect the aircraft that come across our border everyday? The UAE also knows they would be deemed responsible for anything that would happen and would know that it would be taken out on them in a worse way. You do realize we are talking about people that are closer to American Capitalist ideals than anyone in the Middle East and most of Europe and we are insulting them with this bullshit.

I have never claimed to have the knowledge needed to make a truely informed decision, that is what I trust our elected officials to do without partison bickering and bullshit press conferences like this one.

The UAE has enough involvement with terrorism for me to be against the deal. You can perfume the turd as much as you'd like, it's still a turd. You can insult it's detractors as much as you like, it's still a turd. Keep telling yourself you're the only sane one, the only rational one, the only one who REALLY understands the impact on our international relations. I think you're wrong.

 

[sitarro]

The UAE has enough involvement with terrorism for me to be against the deal. You can perfume the turd as much as you'd like, it's still a turd. You can insult it's detractors as much as you like, it's still a turd. Keep telling yourself you're the only sane one, the only rational one, the only one who REALLY understands the impact on our international relations. I think you're wrong.

When do you stop all of the dealings with all groups that have dealt with terrorist? That would of course mean no more flights coming in from most of the countries in the rest of the world. No more investment in this country by these people, get ready for them to want to cash in their stock.....uh oh this country is over.

No more VWs, BMWs, Porsches etc. No more anything from China, no more oil. No more bicycles, no more wine from France, no more MIG rides from Russia....seems like a rational idea. I think you are wrong. Americans aren't chicken shits and should quit acting that way.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

When do you stop all of the dealings with all groups that have dealt with terrorist? That would of course mean no more flights coming in from most of the countries in the rest of the world. No more investment in this country by these people, get ready for them to want to cash in their stock.....uh oh this country is over.

No more VWs, BMWs, Porsches etc. No more anything from China, no more oil. No more bicycles, no more wine from France, no more MIG rides from Russia....seems like a rational idea. I think you are wrong. Americans aren't chicken shits and should quit acting that way.

No ones' talking about "all dealings". we're talking about Port Operations only. Is this pathetic slippery slope argument all you can think of?

 

[dilloduck]

No ones' talking about "all dealings". we're talking about Port Operations only. Is this pathetic slippery slope argument all you can think of?

Everything is safe now that Congress is now furiously protecting all our ports and borders. :rotflmao:

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Everything is safe now that Congress is now furiously protecting all our ports and borders. :rotflmao:

Actually, I don't believe so. There's still more to do. I hope we pass a law prohibiting terrorist supporting nations from operating security sensitive...operations. Isn't that just a f'in kneeslapper?

Anyone have an argument besides, a personal attack, a straw man, a slippery slope, or an assinine irrelevant statement?

 

[Said1]

Actually, I don't believe so. There's still more to do. I hope we pass a law prohibiting terrorist supporting nations from operating security sensitive...operations. Isn't that just a f'in kneeslapper?

Anyone have an argument besides, a personal attack, a straw man, a slippery slope, or an assinine irrelevant statement?

Adrianna: I gotta go now. #2.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Adrianna: I gotta go now. #2.

Im thoroughly confused. Is this from Soprano's? I haven't seen the premiere yet! Probably later on on demand I'll be hittin' it up, yo.

 

[Said1]

Im thoroughly confused. Is this from Soprano's? I haven't seen the premiere yet! Probably later on on demand I'll be hittin' it up, yo.

Season 5 episode 5. Mofo.

 

[dilloduck]

Actually, I don't believe so. There's still more to do. I hope we pass a law prohibiting terrorist supporting nations from operating security sensitive...operations. Isn't that just a f'in kneeslapper?

Anyone have an argument besides, a personal attack, a straw man, a slippery slope, or an assinine irrelevant statement?

wake up, Kool aid dude, You and your lib friends are the ones with the slippery slope argument here. A foreign company wants to lease the ports--and they had 9/11 hijackers there---and they will know all our national security secrets---and they will hire terrorists to sneak past our coast guard ---and blow up cities with dirty bombs ---and TAKE OVER THE UNI---- :blah2:

 

[rtwngAvngr]

wake up, Kool aid dude, You and your lib friends are the ones with the slippery slope argument here. A foreign company wants to lease the ports--and they had 9/11 hijackers there---and they will know all our national security secrets---and they will hire terrorists to sneak past our coast guard ---and blow up cities with dirty bombs ---and TAKE OVER THE UNI---- :blah2:

So I guess that 's a "no, nobody has anything else".

 

[dilloduck]

So I guess that 's a "no, nobody has anything else".

lmao --does it work?

 

[rtwngAvngr]

lmao --does it work?

You tell me.

The main argument is hysterical accusations of protectionism. It's not protectionism.

 

[dilloduck]

You tell me.

The main argument is hysterical accusations of protectionism. It's not protectionism.

no--the main argument is that Schumer and Clinton dredged up something out of a trade magazine to discredit the Bush Administration, appear strong on national security and rely on the media to embellish it enough to turn some relatively sane people into hysterics. ( still feeling greasy from uniting with the libs over at DU? )

 

[rtwngAvngr]

no--the main argument is that Schumer and Clinton dredged up something out of a trade magazine to discredit the Bush Administration, appear strong on national security and rely on the media to embellish it enough to turn some relatively sane people into hysterics. ( still feeling greasy from uniting with the libs over at DU? )

No. Actually the main argument is that DPW is owned by the goverment of UAE, and the UAE has an extensive past of terrorist collaboration.

 

[dilloduck]

No. Actually the main argument is that DPW is owned by the goverment of UAE, and the UAE has an extensive past of terrorist collaboration.

Which does NOT mean they will fall back down your slippery slope. The have an extensive present of helping fight al-queada.

 

[sitarro]

You know what I don't get....why would a country that is more into the "good life" than most anybody would want to take the chance of losing it all by making an enemy out of us? These guys built a indoor ski slope in the desert, they're building the world's tallest building, pay Tiger Woods millions just to show up at their golf tournament each year, have one of the most beautiful pieces of architecture in the world, purchase the finest in transportation available, and obviously love the good life. They obviously also get a real charge out of doing well in the business world, how could they be ones that believe in causing the kind of world changing trouble that could make their lives less secure, what would be the point.

 

[Emmett]

No. Actually the main argument is that DPW is owned by the goverment of UAE, and the UAE has an extensive past of terrorist collaboration.

So is the oil we gladly buy which is shipped in here every day, and I hope it doesn't stop!

RWA, we don't disagree much but I gotta tell ya bro, we already a security problem at out ports. I regularly visit our ports through out the country making deliveries and TRUST ME MAN, we already have a problem!

I sort of think we would have been better off to make the deal because they would have been on the spot and knew it!

 

[rtwngAvngr]

So is the oil we gladly buy which is shipped in here every day, and I hope it doesn't stop!

RWA, we don't disagree much but I gotta tell ya bro, we already a security problem at out ports. I regularly visit our ports through out the country making deliveries and TRUST ME MAN, we already have a problem!

I sort of think we would have been better off to make the deal because they would have been on the spot and knew it!

Letting terrorist supporting nations operate them doesn't help matters. Spit out the koolaid.