Y cons. talk radio is better than libs radio...

ScreamingEagle said:
I believe your negative comments about talk radio are rooted in a liberal hatred of the medium because it is so successful - and not just with the old folks. In fact, talk radio has been SO successful that liberals want to shut it down.

I believe you're pissed off that I disagreed with you earlier in another thread, and now you follow me around rather pathetically to somehow enact revenge.

You don't think that AM radio is favored by older people?
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Figuratively speaking. Laws against certain emotions are crazed.

What about a law on PMS? Judging by your last encounter, I'm guessing I might be able to get your support on that one... ;)
 
Hobbit said:
Having browsed most syndicated talk show hosts in the country, let me offer my analysis.

Rush Limbaugh - He's ultra-conservative, pure and simple. He's not a Bush apologist, as I've seen him criticize Bush many times for not standing up to the Democrats, not cutting spending, and a few other things. He's actually quite intelligent, and is often right about his political predictions. He's a bit extreme for me to always agree with him, but he is entertaining. Also, Rush doesn't stick to politics. He also loves to talk about the NFL.

Sean Hannity - Not as conservative as Rush, but very rude. I've never seen him slam anyone who didn't deserve it, but I really think that's his main draw. Many of his guests end up in a heated argument with him. He also seems to be a bit whimsicle and doesn't always stick by his positions, but for the most part, he's a good guy and entertaining.

Neil Boortz - Straight talker. This guy's a libertarian, but not a nut like most of their party. His latest push is his book, "The Fair Tax Plan" which advocates the elimination of the federal income tax. The man is quite smart and very entertaining. He also doesn't hold back or take sides. Lately, he's been mainly attacking the liberals, but mainly because they're all crazy.

Glenn Beck - My favorite of the bunch. He offers "twice the comedy and half the politics." Mostly, Beck follows news stories that interest him, and stays away from boring stuff like Social Security. He's quite funny and I recommend him to anyone who will listen. Conservative slant.

Bill O'Reilly - A conservative leaning hardball player akin to Hannity, but a bit more polite and steadfast on his positions. He knows how to seperate the story from the commentary, and always lets his guests have the last word. I disagree with him from time to time, but since he keeps the facts and the comments seperate, I can respect his opinion.

Al Franken - He's been saying the same thing every day since the station aired. Bush lied about Iraq. 9/11 was an excuse to erode rights. Bush wants to help big business and nobody else. Bush is stupid. Bush is evil. Bush wants to destroy wildlife. Blah blah blah.

Genine Garafolo (I'm sure I spelled it wrong. What the hell kinda name is that, anyway?) - See Al Franken.

I disagree with you assesment of Oreilly. I find his shameless plugging of his web site quite a turn off. And he DOESNT give them the last word. In fact, I noticed that and pointed it out to my son while we were listening. HAHAH, he would say, "ok, you get the last word" then when the person would finish, he would ALWAYS make a comment of two on what the guy said, and that was the "last word" on it.

All your others I find fairly accurate, no Glenn sacks in my area. I know he fights for fathers rights.

What about Hugh H, Mike M, and Prager? Ann Coulter, and Laura Ingraham?
 
The ClayTaurus said:
That's not as much pessimistic as it is realistic. You're more of a trusting person than I, it seems.

I have to agree with you. Understanding that all people lie occasionally is realistic. If you were to say most people lie alot, that would be considered pessimistic.
 
Jimmyeatworld said:
I'll add Tony Snow to the list. He mixes in some humor with his commentary, and the main thing I like about him is he knows his history. He busted John Edwards last year, when Edwards essentially ripped off a Robert Kennedy speech. Snow recognized some of the lines and was able to dig up the audio of Kennedy from 30+ years before.

As far as radio in general, I have my theory as to why Conservative talk is far more successful that Liberal talk.

Basically, Conservatives tend like listening to people who are like minded. Perhaps because most forms of the media don't present the Conservative view point without a smirk or an outright hateful tone. In any event, I think some Conservatives just like to hear someone who agrees with their opinion.

Liiberals, on the other hand, tend to like hearing opposing views, soemthing that might cause some conflict or confrontation. A Liberal is more apt to look for something from the other side, even if it is just to take the opposite view out of spite.

Also, Conservative talk is generally more entertaining. As Hobbit mentioned, the best known Liberal talk radio hosts right now are just broken records, not coming up with anything new. They could probably run a tape from two years ago and nobody would notice.

Me thinks you should get a two hour slot on ERR America, you would fit right in.

What a joke, conservative talk radio provides much more range of views than Err America.

THE reason talk radio is so succesful, is unlike any other medium, they have to be more directly responsive to their listeners. Radio is more controlled by the listeners than the customers of any other medium. Do you realize how often I find the LA Times on top of the rack, MINUS the sports section. Millions buy the paper SOLELY for the sports section, yet they would include those millions in their subscription base when considering their overall readership.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
I believe you're pissed off that I disagreed with you earlier in another thread, and now you follow me around rather pathetically to somehow enact revenge.

You don't think that AM radio is favored by older people?

Me pissed off? Not in the least. Get over yourself. I just call 'em as I see 'em. And btw I don't see you denying what I just said about your negative comments...only a personal attack in return (typical sign of a liberal). Your ClayFeet are showing... ;)

I'll have to admit percentagewise probably not that many younger people listen compared to older people because they are still in liberal lockstep acquired from the marxist propaganda being force fed to them in our liberal-biased education system. About 15% of the listeners are in age group 18-34 versus 46% in age group 35-64 at least per this WGNS survey.
http://www.1450wgns.com/adlisteners.html

I think it usually takes some experience dealing with real life before many brainwashed young people realize the truth about liberalism. However, I believe that talk radio has had a big hand in the increasing voice of young conservatives on campus...which is anathema to the liberals of course.
http://www.columbiaspectator.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/03/24/42426de6921b1
 
Jimmyeatworld said:
I'll add Tony Snow to the list. He mixes in some humor with his commentary, and the main thing I like about him is he knows his history. He busted John Edwards last year, when Edwards essentially ripped off a Robert Kennedy speech. Snow recognized some of the lines and was able to dig up the audio of Kennedy from 30+ years before.

I'll add Michael Savage to the list. He is rated number 3 in the ratings in terms of numbers of listeners. I believe Rush is considered number 1. Anybody know who is rated number 2?

Central Point, OR - In what some called a mixed bag for talk radio in general after the elections, three-time Best Selling author, Michael Savage, host of Talk Radio Network's The Michael Savage Show showed strong ratings in the Winter Book. "As Michael continues to challenge his audience and himself, the show and the ratings will just continue to grow," says Mark Masters, CEO of TRN. Talkers Magazine has recently named The Michael Savage Show as the third largest talk show in national syndication.
http://www.talkradionetwork.com/
 
ScreamingEagle said:
I'll add Michael Savage to the list. He is rated number 3 in the ratings in terms of numbers of listeners. I believe Rush is considered number 1. Anybody know who is rated number 2?

Probably Hannity or Boortz, but I'm gonna guess Hannity.

Anyway, some were left off the list because I've not listed to their show, or at least not often, though I had heard a little of Savage, Snow, and a few others before.

As far as O'Reilly, yeah, he's losing his edge, but I still enjoy listening when I can find him (no local stations carry him).

And I was calling Hannity a bit rude because he tends to cut people off mid-sentence. Some deserve it because they go off on a monologue and he has to shut them up, but sometimes, I wish he'd let somebody finish before he started talking.
 
ScreamingEagle said:
I think it usually takes some experience dealing with real life before many brainwashed young people realize the truth about liberalism. ]

BINGO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
I don't have the ambition to, or even know if I could have, access to all the archives of Rush, or Hannity for that matter. To me, it's not worth my time to check.

I DO listen to Rush, and I listen to Hannity, often. Meaning two or three times a week. And I know for a FACT, that BOTH of them have an OPEN CHALLENGE to ANYONE that listen's to them, that if something they have purported as a fact, not talking about "opinion", they will GLADLY admitt to the mistake ON AIR, and issue a correction.

Now, does anyone here know any LIBERALS on talk radio that will extend the same deal? I highly frickin' doubt it.
 
ScreamingEagle said:
Me pissed off? Not in the least. Get over yourself. I just call 'em as I see 'em. And btw I don't see you denying what I just said about your negative comments...only a personal attack in return (typical sign of a liberal). Your ClayFeet are showing... ;)

I'll have to admit percentagewise probably not that many younger people listen compared to older people because they are still in liberal lockstep acquired from the marxist propaganda being force fed to them in our liberal-biased education system. About 15% of the listeners are in age group 18-34 versus 46% in age group 35-64 at least per this WGNS survey.
http://www.1450wgns.com/adlisteners.html

I think it usually takes some experience dealing with real life before many brainwashed young people realize the truth about liberalism. However, I believe that talk radio has had a big hand in the increasing voice of young conservatives on campus...which is anathema to the liberals of course.
http://www.columbiaspectator.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/03/24/42426de6921b1

You call 'em as you see 'em? Where have I heard that before?

And I don't deny someone calling me a liberal socialist commie marxist anymore because it's all people like you do on this board. Call someone who disagrees with your worldview a liberal so that you can dismiss them as somehow less relevant than you are. I'm not a liberal. I don't agree with much that comes out of the mouths of liberals like Howard Dean and the like. The democratic party is a complete mess lacking any leadership, issues, or relevancy.

How much longer do I have to continue to get you to stop calling me a liberal every chance you get?

And the reason why us liberal lockstep youths who you seem to have such disdain for don't listen to AM radio much is because it's BORING. Unless you're on a long car trip or need something to drown out the silence at work (and even then, it wears on you) us pinko whipper snappers don't have the patience to listen to AM radio. It's archaic. I know I know, somehow that makes me a socialist. :rolleyes:
 
The ClayTaurus said:
What about a law on PMS? Judging by your last encounter, I'm guessing I might be able to get your support on that one... ;)


Yeah. That's it. I'm "on the rag". Mature much?
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Yeah. That's it. I'm "on the rag". Mature much?
Not what I was saying at all. For a conservative, you sure are quick to find offense. I was referring to that crazy chick you dated.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Not what I was saying at all. For a conservative, you sure are quick to find offense. I was referring to that crazy chick you dated.

Dude. It was her. She was the weirdo. If you have a headache that bad, you turn off the phone; you don't get angry at the people who call. She was messed in the head.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Dude. It was her. She was the weirdo. If you have a headache that bad, you turn off the phone; you don't get angry at the people who call. She was messed in the head.

I KNOW! HENCE WHY PMS SHOULD HAVE A LAW AGAINST IT! I'M TRYING TO TAKE YOUR SIDE ON THIS!!!!!!

Jesus. How much more do I have to spell it out to you?
 
The ClayTaurus said:
I KNOW! HENCE WHY PMS SHOULD HAVE A LAW AGAINST IT! I'M TRYING TO TAKE YOUR SIDE ON THIS!!!!!!

Jesus. How much more do I have to spell it out to you?

You never explicitly said WHO had the pms. I assumed it was an insult. My bad. You don't need to get snippy. Clay "I didn't say that" taurus.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
You never explicitly said WHO had the pms. I assumed it was an insult. My bad. You don't need to get snippy. Clay "I didn't say that" taurus.

Had to get that in, didn't ya.

Isn't PMS usually a female trait? I always thought that was kind of obvious.
 
Hobbit said:
Probably Hannity or Boortz, but I'm gonna guess Hannity.

Anyway, some were left off the list because I've not listed to their show, or at least not often, though I had heard a little of Savage, Snow, and a few others before.

As far as O'Reilly, yeah, he's losing his edge, but I still enjoy listening when I can find him (no local stations carry him).

And I was calling Hannity a bit rude because he tends to cut people off mid-sentence. Some deserve it because they go off on a monologue and he has to shut them up, but sometimes, I wish he'd let somebody finish before he started talking.

Sean is just a New Yorker. Nothing wrong with that.

As for O'Reilly. The man has always irritated me. I mean with Rush, Sean, and others you can atleast sense some genuiness with what they believe and consistancy with their beliefs. O'Reilly has never really convinced me that these are the things he is passionate about. It always seemed to me that he was just saying what he thought the audience wanted him to say to get ratings. Maybe it's just me, but thats the impression I got.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Had to get that in, didn't ya.
that's what she said.
Isn't PMS usually a female trait? I always thought that was kind of obvious.

Yeah. Hence why I thought it was an insult. See? It all makes sense when you get over yourself.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
that's what she said.


Yeah. Hence why I thought it was an insult. See? It all makes sense when you get over yourself.

You thought I was calling you female? Perhaps it would help if you didn't assume every word that comes out of my mouth is an attempt to disparage you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top