X reinstates Infowars' account after Elon Musk allows Alex Jones back on platform

there is a first amendment tight to attack police and commit mayhem? i'll need to check on that.
That is what happened in the cities. When the bar was lowered then. Technically, Americans can be accused of insurrectionist tendencies for anything. Ask the parents at school board meetings. Ask the Catholics taken from their home. Merrick Garland is a fascist with delusions of believing personal superiority over others. Civility is a thin veneer as we are seeing with the Pro Islamic protests/riots.
 
That is what happened in the cities. When the bar was lowered then. Technically, Americans can be accused of insurrectionist tendencies for anything. Ask the parents at school board meetings. Ask the Catholics taken from their home. Merrick Garland is a fascist with delusions of believing personal superiority over others. Civility is a thin veneer as we are seeing with the Pro Islamic protests/riots.
oh, really?
 
A very big clue as to what is truthful and what is not these days is that which is censored by MSM and the powers-that-be.

They censored Alex for telling the truth. They put Julian Assange in prison for telling the truth. They ran Ed Snowden out of the country for telling the truth. Ditto for Tucker and so many more, including all the doctors who spoke the truth about Ivermectin and the poison clot shots.

See, it's not too hard to discern the truth. As Orwell noted, in a time of universal deception, speaking the truth is a radical act. Amen, Brother George.
Subjectively you have no idea what agreements they signed to tell the "truth".
 
That is what happened in the cities. When the bar was lowered then. Technically, Americans can be accused of insurrectionist tendencies for anything. Ask the parents at school board meetings. Ask the Catholics taken from their home. Merrick Garland is a fascist with delusions of believing personal superiority over others. Civility is a thin veneer as we are seeing with the Pro Islamic protests/riots.
It never bothered you when they did it for the Drug War.
 
Yea when a company decides what they believe is "misinformation" and whose opinions they will block from being heard in public, well that's a VERY dangerous precedent to set. Legal to do, but dangerous nonetheless.
Followimg the first amendment is not dangerous.
 
"very little was done to them"? You sure about that?
Yes, lardass. The current VP even endorsed a program to bail them out of jail.

They committed a lot of arson, too.

Do I need to post links, Fatty Fatty Boombalatty?
 

Forum List

Back
Top