Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Gingrich is just another inside-the-beltway ruling class neocon weasel, who stiffed us back in '95 when he caved in the budget battle.....Not that Perry and Romney are any great shakes.I am getting a little--tired like most of you are. We're not supposed to like Newt Gingrich--because he made some "personal" mistakes--and a couple of bad adds.
BUT THIS DUDD-Gingrich-has been freakin kicking ass on Perry and Romney and EVERYONE ELSE since the DEBATES BEGAN.
WTF are you people doing?
Y'all are nuts.Newt has had my attention as a brilliant candidate, since this whole thing began, but I have been prepared to have my mind changed by another "newer" candidate, however that person has not come forth, though my mind has really stayed opened and looking.
I see Newt as a stong leader, much more so than the rest. He has it far over the rest of them, whom I also like but feel less impressed with than with Newt!If he is not electable, then even though I love Cain, he is not electable either, so I would have to go "purple" and that would be with Romney, who I was rooting for as the nominee in the `08 election...
Ive been very impressed with Newt taking Leadership in in these debates.
Your idea of leadership is way off track. If you think consistantly refusing to cooperate with the debate and slipping in lots of witty one liners is leadership then fine, Newt is great. I consider leadership based on standings with the issues and conviction, even when its not what people want to hear.
I stick by what I said, Newt would be a fantastic vice president because of his abilities to get things accomplished in government. However he is not constitutional, he is not conservative enough, and he is wrong on the issues. Another plastic man, anything to stay in office.
I am getting a little--tired like most of you are. We're not supposed to like Newt Gingrich--because he made some "personal" mistakes--and a couple of bad adds.
No, the personal issues is a media contrivance, having to do with ratings.
Opposition to Gingrich is predicated on the fact hes wrong on the bulk of the issues and hed be a dreadful president accordingly. The same is true of Romney, it has nothing to do with being a Mormon. And the same goes for Perry, hes just wrong on the issues, it has nothing to do with Perry being a corrupt politician.
Newt who?
Dont forget Ron Paul who.
My first choice would be Newt because he'd clean Obama's clock, Cain second....because he'd do the same....but nether is electable.
So my choice is still Rick Perry even though he's not the most polished debater.
Well, we've been dealing with polished and look what it got us.
Mitt is too nervous and he's all over the place. I don't really know what he stands for.
My first choice would be Newt because he'd clean Obama's clock, Cain second....because he'd do the same....but nether is electable.
So my choice is still Rick Perry even though he's not the most polished debater.
Well, we've been dealing with polished and look what it got us.
Mitt is too nervous and he's all over the place. I don't really know what he stands for.
Are you stupid? That sounds way to much like chimpy, you know the asshole in a suit that gave us two illeagal unconstitutional wars that were unfunded, expensive unfunded medicare prescription drug program, unfunded tax cuts, patriot act, new branch of government just to 'secure' us, epic cronyism, not one spending bill turned down, torture, guantanamo bay... do I really need to go on?
I mean get f'n real, just cause he has on a thousand dollar suit, polished ring, make-up, and professionally styled hair doesnt make him worth a shit in my book.
On one hand you complain that Romney doesnt know what he is talking about, but Perry has no fucking clue about the world around him, he just wants power so he can auction it off. You need to start doing some critical thinking and question TV when it tries to influence you.
I think only a retard thinks everyone from Texas is the same.
They are two totally different people with different upbringings. The only similarity is that they both have spent time as governor of Texas.
Y'all are nuts.Ive been very impressed with Newt taking Leadership in in these debates.
Your idea of leadership is way off track. If you think consistantly refusing to cooperate with the debate and slipping in lots of witty one liners is leadership then fine, Newt is great. I consider leadership based on standings with the issues and conviction, even when its not what people want to hear.
I stick by what I said, Newt would be a fantastic vice president because of his abilities to get things accomplished in government. However he is not constitutional, he is not conservative enough, and he is wrong on the issues. Another plastic man, anything to stay in office.
He's such a crappy leader the Dick Armey and Bill Paxon tried to overthrow his sorry ass, back in 1997, after showing himself for the garden variety ruling class appeaser of the left that he is.
My first choice would be Newt because he'd clean Obama's clock, Cain second....because he'd do the same....but nether is electable.
So my choice is still Rick Perry even though he's not the most polished debater.
Well, we've been dealing with polished and look what it got us.
Mitt is too nervous and he's all over the place. I don't really know what he stands for.
Every time I see Perry, I see a 61 year old frat boy still trying to impress with his good looks and charm.
Rick Perry, Rush Chairman, damn glad to meet you!
View attachment 15313
View attachment 15314
View attachment 15315
You know what disturbs me? This attitude that the candidate you like hasn't got a chance, so I'm going with X. Bullshit! One of the problems we have in this country is the media spoon feeding us the candidates they deem the front runners and then us settling on who has the best chance of winning instead of fighting for the person we believe would be the best in the job. Fuck Perry! Fuck Mitt! Fuck Newt! I like Gary Johnson because what he says resonates with me as an American voter. I'll back Gary Johnson until he either wins or drops out. Does he have an uphill battle? Well hell yeah he does. Look at last nights debate. Who did the first two questions go to? Perry and Mitt. Who did the hosts try to get to mix it up for ratings sake? Perry and Mitt. Folks, your "front runners" have been selected for you by the media because they are too lazy to actually cover the other candidates and provide worthwhile info on them to their viewers. Too many Americans have become lazy and just go with the vanilla or chocolate that they are told is their only choice. If you have a candidate you think would be the best person for the job, fight for them!!!
You know what disturbs me? This attitude that the candidate you like hasn't got a chance, so I'm going with X. Bullshit! One of the problems we have in this country is the media spoon feeding us the candidates they deem the front runners and then us settling on who has the best chance of winning instead of fighting for the person we believe would be the best in the job. Fuck Perry! Fuck Mitt! Fuck Newt! I like Gary Johnson because what he says resonates with me as an American voter. I'll back Gary Johnson until he either wins or drops out. Does he have an uphill battle? Well hell yeah he does. Look at last nights debate. Who did the first two questions go to? Perry and Mitt. Who did the hosts try to get to mix it up for ratings sake? Perry and Mitt. Folks, your "front runners" have been selected for you by the media because they are too lazy to actually cover the other candidates and provide worthwhile info on them to their viewers. Too many Americans have become lazy and just go with the vanilla or chocolate that they are told is their only choice. If you have a candidate you think would be the best person for the job, fight for them!!!
I like to look down the road and see how the opposition would react to our President.
I don't think Mr. Rogers scares anyone.
I am getting a little--tired like most of you are. We're not supposed to like Newt Gingrich--because he made some "personal" mistakes--and a couple of bad adds.
BUT THIS DUDD-Gingrich-has been freakin kicking ass on Perry and Romney and EVERYONE ELSE since the DEBATES BEGAN.
WTF are you people doing?
You know what disturbs me? This attitude that the candidate you like hasn't got a chance, so I'm going with X. Bullshit! One of the problems we have in this country is the media spoon feeding us the candidates they deem the front runners and then us settling on who has the best chance of winning instead of fighting for the person we believe would be the best in the job. Fuck Perry! Fuck Mitt! Fuck Newt! I like Gary Johnson because what he says resonates with me as an American voter. I'll back Gary Johnson until he either wins or drops out. Does he have an uphill battle? Well hell yeah he does. Look at last nights debate. Who did the first two questions go to? Perry and Mitt. Who did the hosts try to get to mix it up for ratings sake? Perry and Mitt. Folks, your "front runners" have been selected for you by the media because they are too lazy to actually cover the other candidates and provide worthwhile info on them to their viewers. Too many Americans have become lazy and just go with the vanilla or chocolate that they are told is their only choice. If you have a candidate you think would be the best person for the job, fight for them!!!
I like to look down the road and see how the opposition would react to our President.
I don't think Mr. Rogers scares anyone.
I'm much more interested in a non-status quo president with solutions to our nation's problems than a president who scares people.
*snert*....He was such a "great leader" that members of his own caucus tried to overthrow him.Y'all are nuts.Your idea of leadership is way off track. If you think consistantly refusing to cooperate with the debate and slipping in lots of witty one liners is leadership then fine, Newt is great. I consider leadership based on standings with the issues and conviction, even when its not what people want to hear.
I stick by what I said, Newt would be a fantastic vice president because of his abilities to get things accomplished in government. However he is not constitutional, he is not conservative enough, and he is wrong on the issues. Another plastic man, anything to stay in office.
He's such a crappy leader the Dick Armey and Bill Paxon tried to overthrow his sorry ass, back in 1997, after showing himself for the garden variety ruling class appeaser of the left that he is.
To clarify, when I say leadership I am referring to government, IE the house and senat, not the population. I am merely noting that I think if Newt wants a bill passed that the population is behind, it will happen. Not like this Obama bull shit where government has ground to a halt because of partisan crap.
I am getting a little--tired like most of you are. We're not supposed to like Newt Gingrich--because he made some "personal" mistakes--and a couple of bad adds.
BUT THIS DUDD-Gingrich-has been freakin kicking ass on Perry and Romney and EVERYONE ELSE since the DEBATES BEGAN.
WTF are you people doing?
*snert*....He was such a "great leader" that members of his own caucus tried to overthrow him.Y'all are nuts.
He's such a crappy leader the Dick Armey and Bill Paxon tried to overthrow his sorry ass, back in 1997, after showing himself for the garden variety ruling class appeaser of the left that he is.
To clarify, when I say leadership I am referring to government, IE the house and senat, not the population. I am merely noting that I think if Newt wants a bill passed that the population is behind, it will happen. Not like this Obama bull shit where government has ground to a halt because of partisan crap.
Damn....Are the memories that short?
Yeah, well I was paying attention back then, and 1994 was the last time I ever voted for any goddamn slimy republican.*snert*....He was such a "great leader" that members of his own caucus tried to overthrow him.To clarify, when I say leadership I am referring to government, IE the house and senat, not the population. I am merely noting that I think if Newt wants a bill passed that the population is behind, it will happen. Not like this Obama bull shit where government has ground to a halt because of partisan crap.
Damn....Are the memories that short?
I guess cause I dont know what your talking about. But then, I didnt pay any attention to politics untill 9/11. When your 'city on a hill' gets attacked and you watch people jump out of burning buildings on live tv it causes a pause and ignites flames of curiousity.
Been a magnifying glass ever since.
I am getting a little--tired like most of you are. We're not supposed to like Newt Gingrich--because he made some "personal" mistakes--and a couple of bad adds.
BUT THIS DUDD-Gingrich-has been freakin kicking ass on Perry and Romney and EVERYONE ELSE since the DEBATES BEGAN.
WTF are you people doing?
Most of us over 40 remember Newt's Embarrassing failure with the Contract on America, and could never vote for that Buffoon, and more than vote for the Clown Rick Perry.
I am getting a little--tired like most of you are. We're not supposed to like Newt Gingrich--because he made some "personal" mistakes--and a couple of bad adds.
BUT THIS DUDD-Gingrich-has been freakin kicking ass on Perry and Romney and EVERYONE ELSE since the DEBATES BEGAN.
WTF are you people doing?
Most of us over 40 remember Newt's Embarrassing failure with the Contract on America, and could never vote for that Buffoon, and more than vote for the Clown Rick Perry.
Shit.....Republicans can sometimes be their own worst enemy.
I've got an idea.....why don't we just tear all of these GOP fuckers down and re-elect that Cheese-Dick asshole that's currently occupying the Oval Office.
