Not surprising though since I have yet to ever meet an Elvis worshipper who has any logic or common sense.
but not by explosives, you fucking moron
Its not crap or ridiculous at all..Here look at this link.go to the 32nd one at the bottom that says Popular Mechanics Debunked and click it on.
Canada 9/11 Truth - Videos
watch that video,it only takes about 25 minutes or so.did you watch it? as you heard from listening to it,the radio show host called in a demolition firm with a radio caller on and they confirmed it for him that the term "pull it" IS a demolition term for bring it down.
the evidence in those 47 videos is overwhelming evidence that it was an inside job and that explosives brought down those three towers.I have posted it countless numbers of times for the three 9/11 frady cats diamond dave retired gy sgt and godboy to comment on the videos,but everytime I challenge them to watch those videos and comment on them,they run away with their tails between their legs and never bother to watch them or comment on them cause they see they cant debunk them,therfore they never finish watching the rest of them since it disproves the 9/11 coverup commission.
what I think is funny is that Silverstein later tried to fix his mistake when he spilled the beans about pull it in 2004,he later said he meant to pull the firemen out.funny how he refers to the firemen as it.plus apparently all the firemen were long gone from building 7.what a freaking liar silverstien is.Lets hang the bastard.
yeah, everyone is in on the conspiracy
As for the IQ thing, youll have to beat a 130 IQ if you want to beat me.
Greetings to All:
All of the evidence points directly to inside-job terrorists taking down WTC-7 by Controlled Demolition on 9/11. WTC-7 was designed and built using Compartmentalization of all supporting columns and beams separated by solid concrete slabs horizontally and curtain walls vertically making death by fire an impossibility. A building fire has never destroyed a steel-framed skyscraper in US history before or after 9/11 and WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7 were owned by Larry Pull It Silverstein all suffering the same fate. Many fail to realize the World Trade Center Towers had never been in private hands prior to the summer of 2001, when Mr. Silverstein received possession from the New York Port Authority.
Cooperative Research Website:
Watch the [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]LD06SAf0p9A[/MEDIA] Collapse Video[/ame] again:
Use your curser to hold the round scrollbar and move WTC-7 up and down repeatedly. The roof section and the center of the building collapse first, then the two sides plummet at free fall velocity like any successful controlled demolition. Before looking at the details of how WTC-7 was built using Compartmentalization of all the steel supports, we need to take a look at the massive building itself.
All of the WTC-7 steel columns, beams, girders and bar joists were bolted down and welded together into a single unit creating literally thousands of connections that must be severed to cause the catastrophic failure seen from the aftermath of the attack.
The melting point of WTC-7 structural steel is 1535 degrees Celsius or 2795 degrees Fahrenheit. The first problem with the Fire Caused The Collapse Theory is that building fires burn between 800 and 1000 degrees Fahrenheit, or about one third the required temperature to melt structural steel. The second problem is that building fires typically burn for only 20 minutes in any given area, because the fuel is depleted and the fire moves in the direction of a fresh fuel source. The third problem is that steel is an excellent conductor of heat and any steel-framed network would disperse the heat much more quickly than any building fire could raise the temperature to anywhere near steel-softening temperatures. Another problem is that all supporting columns were coated with 3-hour spray-on fireproofing insulation, which is nine times more protection needed for the typical building fire; even if the required 2800 degree temperatures were reached.
911Research Website:
The website above is perhaps the best on the internet for discovering the truth about the WTC-7 collapse. Moving down the page, Figure 5-3 shows the massive steel network and how certain areas (floors 1-7, 22-24) received extra support.
This information is very important, because remember WTC-7 collapsed in one single smooth motion, which means extra attention was paid to placing charges to sever these thicker and stronger steel supports. Try to imagine the amount of energy required to break all of these connections simultaneously and you begin to see the building fire theory is certainly a hoax. Below you come to Figure 5.3.3 and descriptions of how WTC-7 was built in many separate compartments eliminating fire as even a remote possibility for causing this collapse.
Even if two or five or ten fires were started, the fuel source within those particular compartments would be consumed LONG before the fireproofing safety countermeasures were compromised; and the fire had no way to pass through solid concrete slabs or curtain walls to invade the neighboring compartments. This does not even account for the fully functional sprinkler system that had to be turned off for these fires to spread any distance at all. Here is a four minute video to help gain a better perspective on how to weigh the evidence in this case:
Four Minute WTC-7 Collapse Video
Fire has never destroyed a steel building, but three steel buildings owned by Larry Silverstein were Pulled on 9/11. Pull it is controlled demolition lingo for wiring the building up and pulling it down. Mr. Silverstein was obviously lying about speaking to the New York Fire Chief, as the firemen only entered the scene on 9/11 after the Twin Towers attacks. This Fire Chief had no access to Controlled Demolition charges when he arrived at WTC-7 for Pulling down the 47-story steel-framed skyscraper that could possibly be placed in a single day. Here we have a few small fires burning on a few floors, but the Fire Chief cannot figure any way to extinguish them. Since the firemen had no time to set all the required charges to Pull WTC-7 down in just a few hours, as if firemen even have controlled demolition crews, then Mr. Silverstein just pointed the finger at himself about having prior knowledge of these 9/11 attacks. Now compare our images of WTC-7 and these Pull It videos:
Paris Building
Office Building
Landmark Tower Implosion
Many buildings have been demolished using controlled demolition looking exactly like WTC-7 on 9/11, but again, no steel-framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire in the history of this planet. Twenty-first century demolition techniques include the use of Thermite Shaped Charges found all over WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7.
Shaped Charges And The World Trade Center Collapses
The damage from a thermite/thermate shaped charge is exactly what you see above the confused firemans head. Note the size of the massive column and the molten iron residue that flowed inside and outside the column.
Thermite burns at a very high 2500 degrees Centigrade or 4532 degrees Fahrenheit, which represents the kind of temperature required to sever these massive red-iron columns. As a demolition supervisor (search "Terral") tearing down buildings for many years, I know of nobody using 45-degree angle cuts to remove any red-iron part of any conventional demolition job. This particular column has molten iron residue, which is a Controlled Demolition Signature, as any torch cut would blow the molten iron off the column entirely away from the worker. There is no cut from any torch that would leave molten iron residue on the inside and outside of 'all' the sides of a column this way. The idea that any demolition worker would make a 45-degree cut is ridiculous, because of the danger to other workers and the waste of fuel.
Another problem with the Official Fire Cover Story is these 45-degree angle shaped-charge cuts appear everywhere . . .
. . . even in locations where demolition crew workers could not possibly reach. The common practice is to remove steel debris in an orderly pick and remove manner, which eliminates the possibility of needlessly shifting weight and putting workers in danger. We play this dangerous game like a child plays Pickup Sticks, as any skilled demolition foreman can look at the pile and tell you which debris to remove first. None of the demolition workers in the picture above climbed up any ladder forty or fifty feet in the air to make that 45-degree angle cut, because that was part of the original Controlled Demolition (AE911Truth.org) of WTC-7. Note the clean 90-degree cuts labeled Severed Column End scattered throughout the debris pile. However, also note these steel members are buried under the debris of the walls collapsing upon them during the controlled demolition process. These cuts could not have been made by this demolition crew, because they still have mountains of debris to remove before even thinking about cutting any structural steel; which would only serve to shift weight in this very dangerous situation. The very best work on these WTC controlled demolition attacks is presented by Dr. Steven E. Jones (Brigham Young University) here:
Liberty Post Website:
WTC-7 was definitely (100 percent certainty) brought down using Controlled Demolition techniques also found in WTC-1 and WTC-2. This evidence explains why we have reports on hundreds of explosions taking place throughout the day.
9/11 Firemen Describe WTC Explosions
And yet, the keyword sanitized 911Commission Report only uses the term explosion six times outside the notation references for all these 9/11 cases combined and never uses the term explosions (plural) even once. Guess what? The bogus Arlington County After-Action Report uses the term explosion six times in 215 pages and also never uses the term explosions even one time the very same way, even though we can hear multiple explosions taking place in this single [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]WefPzgxvfS4[/MEDIA] Video[/ame].
9/11 was definitely an inside-job and many LIARS are helping the real terrorists get away with murdering thousands of our innocent fellow Americans. Let us see how many Official Cover Story LIARS line up to convince these readers that 9/11 was carried out by people like this (pic) and that building fires and debris took down these WTC skyscrapers . . .
GL,
Terral
There is no debate. The towers were taken down by planes, piloted by AQ terrorists, masterminded by OBL. Are you guys really STILL talking about this nonsense? This conspiracy is so old.Greetings to All:
All of the evidence points directly to inside-job terrorists taking down WTC-7 by Controlled Demolition on 9/11. WTC-7 was designed and built using Compartmentalization of all supporting columns and beams separated by solid concrete slabs horizontally and curtain walls vertically making death by fire an impossibility. A building fire has never destroyed a steel-framed skyscraper in US history before or after 9/11 and WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7 were owned by Larry Pull It Silverstein all suffering the same fate. Many fail to realize the World Trade Center Towers had never been in private hands prior to the summer of 2001, when Mr. Silverstein received possession from the New York Port Authority.
Cooperative Research Website:
Watch the [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]LD06SAf0p9A[/MEDIA] Collapse Video[/ame] again:
Use your curser to hold the round scrollbar and move WTC-7 up and down repeatedly. The roof section and the center of the building collapse first, then the two sides plummet at free fall velocity like any successful controlled demolition. Before looking at the details of how WTC-7 was built using Compartmentalization of all the steel supports, we need to take a look at the massive building itself.
All of the WTC-7 steel columns, beams, girders and bar joists were bolted down and welded together into a single unit creating literally thousands of connections that must be severed to cause the catastrophic failure seen from the aftermath of the attack.
The melting point of WTC-7 structural steel is 1535 degrees Celsius or 2795 degrees Fahrenheit. The first problem with the Fire Caused The Collapse Theory is that building fires burn between 800 and 1000 degrees Fahrenheit, or about one third the required temperature to melt structural steel. The second problem is that building fires typically burn for only 20 minutes in any given area, because the fuel is depleted and the fire moves in the direction of a fresh fuel source. The third problem is that steel is an excellent conductor of heat and any steel-framed network would disperse the heat much more quickly than any building fire could raise the temperature to anywhere near steel-softening temperatures. Another problem is that all supporting columns were coated with 3-hour spray-on fireproofing insulation, which is nine times more protection needed for the typical building fire; even if the required 2800 degree temperatures were reached.
911Research Website:
The website above is perhaps the best on the internet for discovering the truth about the WTC-7 collapse. Moving down the page, Figure 5-3 shows the massive steel network and how certain areas (floors 1-7, 22-24) received extra support.
This information is very important, because remember WTC-7 collapsed in one single smooth motion, which means extra attention was paid to placing charges to sever these thicker and stronger steel supports. Try to imagine the amount of energy required to break all of these connections simultaneously and you begin to see the building fire theory is certainly a hoax. Below you come to Figure 5.3.3 and descriptions of how WTC-7 was built in many separate compartments eliminating fire as even a remote possibility for causing this collapse.
Even if two or five or ten fires were started, the fuel source within those particular compartments would be consumed LONG before the fireproofing safety countermeasures were compromised; and the fire had no way to pass through solid concrete slabs or curtain walls to invade the neighboring compartments. This does not even account for the fully functional sprinkler system that had to be turned off for these fires to spread any distance at all. Here is a four minute video to help gain a better perspective on how to weigh the evidence in this case:
Four Minute WTC-7 Collapse Video
Fire has never destroyed a steel building, but three steel buildings owned by Larry Silverstein were Pulled on 9/11. Pull it is controlled demolition lingo for wiring the building up and pulling it down. Mr. Silverstein was obviously lying about speaking to the New York Fire Chief, as the firemen only entered the scene on 9/11 after the Twin Towers attacks. This Fire Chief had no access to Controlled Demolition charges when he arrived at WTC-7 for Pulling down the 47-story steel-framed skyscraper that could possibly be placed in a single day. Here we have a few small fires burning on a few floors, but the Fire Chief cannot figure any way to extinguish them. Since the firemen had no time to set all the required charges to Pull WTC-7 down in just a few hours, as if firemen even have controlled demolition crews, then Mr. Silverstein just pointed the finger at himself about having prior knowledge of these 9/11 attacks. Now compare our images of WTC-7 and these Pull It videos:
Paris Building
Office Building
Landmark Tower Implosion
Many buildings have been demolished using controlled demolition looking exactly like WTC-7 on 9/11, but again, no steel-framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire in the history of this planet. Twenty-first century demolition techniques include the use of Thermite Shaped Charges found all over WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7.
Shaped Charges And The World Trade Center Collapses
The damage from a thermite/thermate shaped charge is exactly what you see above the confused firemans head. Note the size of the massive column and the molten iron residue that flowed inside and outside the column.
Thermite burns at a very high 2500 degrees Centigrade or 4532 degrees Fahrenheit, which represents the kind of temperature required to sever these massive red-iron columns. As a demolition supervisor (search "Terral") tearing down buildings for many years, I know of nobody using 45-degree angle cuts to remove any red-iron part of any conventional demolition job. This particular column has molten iron residue, which is a Controlled Demolition Signature, as any torch cut would blow the molten iron off the column entirely away from the worker. There is no cut from any torch that would leave molten iron residue on the inside and outside of 'all' the sides of a column this way. The idea that any demolition worker would make a 45-degree cut is ridiculous, because of the danger to other workers and the waste of fuel.
Another problem with the Official Fire Cover Story is these 45-degree angle shaped-charge cuts appear everywhere . . .
. . . even in locations where demolition crew workers could not possibly reach. The common practice is to remove steel debris in an orderly pick and remove manner, which eliminates the possibility of needlessly shifting weight and putting workers in danger. We play this dangerous game like a child plays Pickup Sticks, as any skilled demolition foreman can look at the pile and tell you which debris to remove first. None of the demolition workers in the picture above climbed up any ladder forty or fifty feet in the air to make that 45-degree angle cut, because that was part of the original Controlled Demolition (AE911Truth.org) of WTC-7. Note the clean 90-degree cuts labeled Severed Column End scattered throughout the debris pile. However, also note these steel members are buried under the debris of the walls collapsing upon them during the controlled demolition process. These cuts could not have been made by this demolition crew, because they still have mountains of debris to remove before even thinking about cutting any structural steel; which would only serve to shift weight in this very dangerous situation. The very best work on these WTC controlled demolition attacks is presented by Dr. Steven E. Jones (Brigham Young University) here:
Liberty Post Website:
WTC-7 was definitely (100 percent certainty) brought down using Controlled Demolition techniques also found in WTC-1 and WTC-2. This evidence explains why we have reports on hundreds of explosions taking place throughout the day.
9/11 Firemen Describe WTC Explosions
And yet, the keyword sanitized 911Commission Report only uses the term explosion six times outside the notation references for all these 9/11 cases combined and never uses the term explosions (plural) even once. Guess what? The bogus Arlington County After-Action Report uses the term explosion six times in 215 pages and also never uses the term explosions even one time the very same way, even though we can hear multiple explosions taking place in this single [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]WefPzgxvfS4[/MEDIA] Video[/ame].
9/11 was definitely an inside-job and many LIARS are helping the real terrorists get away with murdering thousands of our innocent fellow Americans. Let us see how many Official Cover Story LIARS line up to convince these readers that 9/11 was carried out by people like this (pic) and that building fires and debris took down these WTC skyscrapers . . .
GL,
Terral
terral so much took the shills and trolls to school on this that demolitions brought down the towers,these trolls like agent rightwinger cant stand toe to toe in this debate and always get their asses owned.LOL
There is no debate. You loons never proved your conspiracy theory. No one bought your line of bullshit.one of the trolls i just got dont talking about who cant stand toe to toe in a debate that came here to take a shit in this thread.^
WTC-7 was not hit by a planeThere is no debate. The towers were taken down by planes, piloted by AQ terrorists, masterminded by OBL. Are you guys really STILL talking about this nonsense? This conspiracy is so old.Greetings to All:
All of the evidence points directly to inside-job terrorists taking down WTC-7 by Controlled Demolition on 9/11. WTC-7 was designed and built using Compartmentalization of all supporting columns and beams separated by solid concrete slabs horizontally and curtain walls vertically making death by fire an impossibility. A building fire has never destroyed a steel-framed skyscraper in US history before or after 9/11 and WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7 were owned by Larry Pull It Silverstein all suffering the same fate. Many fail to realize the World Trade Center Towers had never been in private hands prior to the summer of 2001, when Mr. Silverstein received possession from the New York Port Authority.
Cooperative Research Website:
Watch the [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]LD06SAf0p9A[/MEDIA] Collapse Video[/ame] again:
Use your curser to hold the round scrollbar and move WTC-7 up and down repeatedly. The roof section and the center of the building collapse first, then the two sides plummet at free fall velocity like any successful controlled demolition. Before looking at the details of how WTC-7 was built using Compartmentalization of all the steel supports, we need to take a look at the massive building itself.
All of the WTC-7 steel columns, beams, girders and bar joists were bolted down and welded together into a single unit creating literally thousands of connections that must be severed to cause the catastrophic failure seen from the aftermath of the attack.
The melting point of WTC-7 structural steel is 1535 degrees Celsius or 2795 degrees Fahrenheit. The first problem with the Fire Caused The Collapse Theory is that building fires burn between 800 and 1000 degrees Fahrenheit, or about one third the required temperature to melt structural steel. The second problem is that building fires typically burn for only 20 minutes in any given area, because the fuel is depleted and the fire moves in the direction of a fresh fuel source. The third problem is that steel is an excellent conductor of heat and any steel-framed network would disperse the heat much more quickly than any building fire could raise the temperature to anywhere near steel-softening temperatures. Another problem is that all supporting columns were coated with 3-hour spray-on fireproofing insulation, which is nine times more protection needed for the typical building fire; even if the required 2800 degree temperatures were reached.
911Research Website:
The website above is perhaps the best on the internet for discovering the truth about the WTC-7 collapse. Moving down the page, Figure 5-3 shows the massive steel network and how certain areas (floors 1-7, 22-24) received extra support.
This information is very important, because remember WTC-7 collapsed in one single smooth motion, which means extra attention was paid to placing charges to sever these thicker and stronger steel supports. Try to imagine the amount of energy required to break all of these connections simultaneously and you begin to see the building fire theory is certainly a hoax. Below you come to Figure 5.3.3 and descriptions of how WTC-7 was built in many separate compartments eliminating fire as even a remote possibility for causing this collapse.
Even if two or five or ten fires were started, the fuel source within those particular compartments would be consumed LONG before the fireproofing safety countermeasures were compromised; and the fire had no way to pass through solid concrete slabs or curtain walls to invade the neighboring compartments. This does not even account for the fully functional sprinkler system that had to be turned off for these fires to spread any distance at all. Here is a four minute video to help gain a better perspective on how to weigh the evidence in this case:
Four Minute WTC-7 Collapse Video
Fire has never destroyed a steel building, but three steel buildings owned by Larry Silverstein were Pulled on 9/11. Pull it is controlled demolition lingo for wiring the building up and pulling it down. Mr. Silverstein was obviously lying about speaking to the New York Fire Chief, as the firemen only entered the scene on 9/11 after the Twin Towers attacks. This Fire Chief had no access to Controlled Demolition charges when he arrived at WTC-7 for Pulling down the 47-story steel-framed skyscraper that could possibly be placed in a single day. Here we have a few small fires burning on a few floors, but the Fire Chief cannot figure any way to extinguish them. Since the firemen had no time to set all the required charges to Pull WTC-7 down in just a few hours, as if firemen even have controlled demolition crews, then Mr. Silverstein just pointed the finger at himself about having prior knowledge of these 9/11 attacks. Now compare our images of WTC-7 and these Pull It videos:
Paris Building
Office Building
Landmark Tower Implosion
Many buildings have been demolished using controlled demolition looking exactly like WTC-7 on 9/11, but again, no steel-framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire in the history of this planet. Twenty-first century demolition techniques include the use of Thermite Shaped Charges found all over WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7.
Shaped Charges And The World Trade Center Collapses
The damage from a thermite/thermate shaped charge is exactly what you see above the confused firemans head. Note the size of the massive column and the molten iron residue that flowed inside and outside the column.
Thermite burns at a very high 2500 degrees Centigrade or 4532 degrees Fahrenheit, which represents the kind of temperature required to sever these massive red-iron columns. As a demolition supervisor (search "Terral") tearing down buildings for many years, I know of nobody using 45-degree angle cuts to remove any red-iron part of any conventional demolition job. This particular column has molten iron residue, which is a Controlled Demolition Signature, as any torch cut would blow the molten iron off the column entirely away from the worker. There is no cut from any torch that would leave molten iron residue on the inside and outside of 'all' the sides of a column this way. The idea that any demolition worker would make a 45-degree cut is ridiculous, because of the danger to other workers and the waste of fuel.
Another problem with the Official Fire Cover Story is these 45-degree angle shaped-charge cuts appear everywhere . . .
. . . even in locations where demolition crew workers could not possibly reach. The common practice is to remove steel debris in an orderly pick and remove manner, which eliminates the possibility of needlessly shifting weight and putting workers in danger. We play this dangerous game like a child plays Pickup Sticks, as any skilled demolition foreman can look at the pile and tell you which debris to remove first. None of the demolition workers in the picture above climbed up any ladder forty or fifty feet in the air to make that 45-degree angle cut, because that was part of the original Controlled Demolition (AE911Truth.org) of WTC-7. Note the clean 90-degree cuts labeled Severed Column End scattered throughout the debris pile. However, also note these steel members are buried under the debris of the walls collapsing upon them during the controlled demolition process. These cuts could not have been made by this demolition crew, because they still have mountains of debris to remove before even thinking about cutting any structural steel; which would only serve to shift weight in this very dangerous situation. The very best work on these WTC controlled demolition attacks is presented by Dr. Steven E. Jones (Brigham Young University) here:
Liberty Post Website:
WTC-7 was definitely (100 percent certainty) brought down using Controlled Demolition techniques also found in WTC-1 and WTC-2. This evidence explains why we have reports on hundreds of explosions taking place throughout the day.
9/11 Firemen Describe WTC Explosions
And yet, the keyword sanitized 911Commission Report only uses the term explosion six times outside the notation references for all these 9/11 cases combined and never uses the term explosions (plural) even once. Guess what? The bogus Arlington County After-Action Report uses the term explosion six times in 215 pages and also never uses the term explosions even one time the very same way, even though we can hear multiple explosions taking place in this single [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]WefPzgxvfS4[/MEDIA] Video[/ame].
9/11 was definitely an inside-job and many LIARS are helping the real terrorists get away with murdering thousands of our innocent fellow Americans. Let us see how many Official Cover Story LIARS line up to convince these readers that 9/11 was carried out by people like this (pic) and that building fires and debris took down these WTC skyscrapers . . .
GL,
Terral
terral so much took the shills and trolls to school on this that demolitions brought down the towers,these trolls like agent rightwinger cant stand toe to toe in this debate and always get their asses owned.LOL
WTC-7 was not hit by a planeThere is no debate. The towers were taken down by planes, piloted by AQ terrorists, masterminded by OBL. Are you guys really STILL talking about this nonsense? This conspiracy is so old.Greetings to All:
All of the evidence points directly to inside-job terrorists taking down WTC-7 by Controlled Demolition on 9/11. WTC-7 was designed and built using Compartmentalization of all supporting columns and beams separated by solid concrete slabs horizontally and curtain walls vertically making death by fire an impossibility. A building fire has never destroyed a steel-framed skyscraper in US history before or after 9/11 and WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7 were owned by Larry Pull It Silverstein all suffering the same fate. Many fail to realize the World Trade Center Towers had never been in private hands prior to the summer of 2001, when Mr. Silverstein received possession from the New York Port Authority.
Cooperative Research Website:
Watch the [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]LD06SAf0p9A[/MEDIA] Collapse Video[/ame] again:
Use your curser to hold the round scrollbar and move WTC-7 up and down repeatedly. The roof section and the center of the building collapse first, then the two sides plummet at free fall velocity like any successful controlled demolition. Before looking at the details of how WTC-7 was built using Compartmentalization of all the steel supports, we need to take a look at the massive building itself.
All of the WTC-7 steel columns, beams, girders and bar joists were bolted down and welded together into a single unit creating literally thousands of connections that must be severed to cause the catastrophic failure seen from the aftermath of the attack.
The melting point of WTC-7 structural steel is 1535 degrees Celsius or 2795 degrees Fahrenheit. The first problem with the Fire Caused The Collapse Theory is that building fires burn between 800 and 1000 degrees Fahrenheit, or about one third the required temperature to melt structural steel. The second problem is that building fires typically burn for only 20 minutes in any given area, because the fuel is depleted and the fire moves in the direction of a fresh fuel source. The third problem is that steel is an excellent conductor of heat and any steel-framed network would disperse the heat much more quickly than any building fire could raise the temperature to anywhere near steel-softening temperatures. Another problem is that all supporting columns were coated with 3-hour spray-on fireproofing insulation, which is nine times more protection needed for the typical building fire; even if the required 2800 degree temperatures were reached.
911Research Website:
The website above is perhaps the best on the internet for discovering the truth about the WTC-7 collapse. Moving down the page, Figure 5-3 shows the massive steel network and how certain areas (floors 1-7, 22-24) received extra support.
This information is very important, because remember WTC-7 collapsed in one single smooth motion, which means extra attention was paid to placing charges to sever these thicker and stronger steel supports. Try to imagine the amount of energy required to break all of these connections simultaneously and you begin to see the building fire theory is certainly a hoax. Below you come to Figure 5.3.3 and descriptions of how WTC-7 was built in many separate compartments eliminating fire as even a remote possibility for causing this collapse.
Even if two or five or ten fires were started, the fuel source within those particular compartments would be consumed LONG before the fireproofing safety countermeasures were compromised; and the fire had no way to pass through solid concrete slabs or curtain walls to invade the neighboring compartments. This does not even account for the fully functional sprinkler system that had to be turned off for these fires to spread any distance at all. Here is a four minute video to help gain a better perspective on how to weigh the evidence in this case:
Four Minute WTC-7 Collapse Video
Fire has never destroyed a steel building, but three steel buildings owned by Larry Silverstein were Pulled on 9/11. Pull it is controlled demolition lingo for wiring the building up and pulling it down. Mr. Silverstein was obviously lying about speaking to the New York Fire Chief, as the firemen only entered the scene on 9/11 after the Twin Towers attacks. This Fire Chief had no access to Controlled Demolition charges when he arrived at WTC-7 for Pulling down the 47-story steel-framed skyscraper that could possibly be placed in a single day. Here we have a few small fires burning on a few floors, but the Fire Chief cannot figure any way to extinguish them. Since the firemen had no time to set all the required charges to Pull WTC-7 down in just a few hours, as if firemen even have controlled demolition crews, then Mr. Silverstein just pointed the finger at himself about having prior knowledge of these 9/11 attacks. Now compare our images of WTC-7 and these Pull It videos:
Paris Building
Office Building
Landmark Tower Implosion
Many buildings have been demolished using controlled demolition looking exactly like WTC-7 on 9/11, but again, no steel-framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire in the history of this planet. Twenty-first century demolition techniques include the use of Thermite Shaped Charges found all over WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7.
Shaped Charges And The World Trade Center Collapses
The damage from a thermite/thermate shaped charge is exactly what you see above the confused firemans head. Note the size of the massive column and the molten iron residue that flowed inside and outside the column.
Thermite burns at a very high 2500 degrees Centigrade or 4532 degrees Fahrenheit, which represents the kind of temperature required to sever these massive red-iron columns. As a demolition supervisor (search "Terral") tearing down buildings for many years, I know of nobody using 45-degree angle cuts to remove any red-iron part of any conventional demolition job. This particular column has molten iron residue, which is a Controlled Demolition Signature, as any torch cut would blow the molten iron off the column entirely away from the worker. There is no cut from any torch that would leave molten iron residue on the inside and outside of 'all' the sides of a column this way. The idea that any demolition worker would make a 45-degree cut is ridiculous, because of the danger to other workers and the waste of fuel.
Another problem with the Official Fire Cover Story is these 45-degree angle shaped-charge cuts appear everywhere . . .
. . . even in locations where demolition crew workers could not possibly reach. The common practice is to remove steel debris in an orderly pick and remove manner, which eliminates the possibility of needlessly shifting weight and putting workers in danger. We play this dangerous game like a child plays Pickup Sticks, as any skilled demolition foreman can look at the pile and tell you which debris to remove first. None of the demolition workers in the picture above climbed up any ladder forty or fifty feet in the air to make that 45-degree angle cut, because that was part of the original Controlled Demolition (AE911Truth.org) of WTC-7. Note the clean 90-degree cuts labeled Severed Column End scattered throughout the debris pile. However, also note these steel members are buried under the debris of the walls collapsing upon them during the controlled demolition process. These cuts could not have been made by this demolition crew, because they still have mountains of debris to remove before even thinking about cutting any structural steel; which would only serve to shift weight in this very dangerous situation. The very best work on these WTC controlled demolition attacks is presented by Dr. Steven E. Jones (Brigham Young University) here:
Liberty Post Website:
WTC-7 was definitely (100 percent certainty) brought down using Controlled Demolition techniques also found in WTC-1 and WTC-2. This evidence explains why we have reports on hundreds of explosions taking place throughout the day.
9/11 Firemen Describe WTC Explosions
And yet, the keyword sanitized 911Commission Report only uses the term explosion six times outside the notation references for all these 9/11 cases combined and never uses the term explosions (plural) even once. Guess what? The bogus Arlington County After-Action Report uses the term explosion six times in 215 pages and also never uses the term explosions even one time the very same way, even though we can hear multiple explosions taking place in this single [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]WefPzgxvfS4[/MEDIA] Video[/ame].
9/11 was definitely an inside-job and many LIARS are helping the real terrorists get away with murdering thousands of our innocent fellow Americans. Let us see how many Official Cover Story LIARS line up to convince these readers that 9/11 was carried out by people like this (pic) and that building fires and debris took down these WTC skyscrapers . . .
GL,
Terral
terral so much took the shills and trolls to school on this that demolitions brought down the towers,these trolls like agent rightwinger cant stand toe to toe in this debate and always get their asses owned.LOL
Files relating to numerous federal investigations had been housed in 7 World Trade Center. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission estimated over 10,000 of its cases were affected.[50] Investigative files in the Secret Service's largest field office were lost, with one Secret Service agent saying, "All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building."[51] Copies of emails in connection with the WorldCom scandal that were later requested by the SEC from Salomon Brothers, a subsidiary of Citigroup housed in the building, were also destroyed.[52]
Tower 7 burned down.WTC-7 was not hit by a planeThere is no debate. The towers were taken down by planes, piloted by AQ terrorists, masterminded by OBL. Are you guys really STILL talking about this nonsense? This conspiracy is so old.Greetings to All:
All of the evidence points directly to inside-job terrorists taking down WTC-7 by Controlled Demolition on 9/11. WTC-7 was designed and built using Compartmentalization of all supporting columns and beams separated by solid concrete slabs horizontally and curtain walls vertically making death by fire an impossibility. A building fire has never destroyed a steel-framed skyscraper in US history before or after 9/11 and WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7 were owned by Larry Pull It Silverstein all suffering the same fate. Many fail to realize the World Trade Center Towers had never been in private hands prior to the summer of 2001, when Mr. Silverstein received possession from the New York Port Authority.
Cooperative Research Website:
Watch the [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]LD06SAf0p9A[/MEDIA] Collapse Video[/ame] again:
Use your curser to hold the round scrollbar and move WTC-7 up and down repeatedly. The roof section and the center of the building collapse first, then the two sides plummet at free fall velocity like any successful controlled demolition. Before looking at the details of how WTC-7 was built using Compartmentalization of all the steel supports, we need to take a look at the massive building itself.
All of the WTC-7 steel columns, beams, girders and bar joists were bolted down and welded together into a single unit creating literally thousands of connections that must be severed to cause the catastrophic failure seen from the aftermath of the attack.
The melting point of WTC-7 structural steel is 1535 degrees Celsius or 2795 degrees Fahrenheit. The first problem with the Fire Caused The Collapse Theory is that building fires burn between 800 and 1000 degrees Fahrenheit, or about one third the required temperature to melt structural steel. The second problem is that building fires typically burn for only 20 minutes in any given area, because the fuel is depleted and the fire moves in the direction of a fresh fuel source. The third problem is that steel is an excellent conductor of heat and any steel-framed network would disperse the heat much more quickly than any building fire could raise the temperature to anywhere near steel-softening temperatures. Another problem is that all supporting columns were coated with 3-hour spray-on fireproofing insulation, which is nine times more protection needed for the typical building fire; even if the required 2800 degree temperatures were reached.
911Research Website:
The website above is perhaps the best on the internet for discovering the truth about the WTC-7 collapse. Moving down the page, Figure 5-3 shows the massive steel network and how certain areas (floors 1-7, 22-24) received extra support.
This information is very important, because remember WTC-7 collapsed in one single smooth motion, which means extra attention was paid to placing charges to sever these thicker and stronger steel supports. Try to imagine the amount of energy required to break all of these connections simultaneously and you begin to see the building fire theory is certainly a hoax. Below you come to Figure 5.3.3 and descriptions of how WTC-7 was built in many separate compartments eliminating fire as even a remote possibility for causing this collapse.
Even if two or five or ten fires were started, the fuel source within those particular compartments would be consumed LONG before the fireproofing safety countermeasures were compromised; and the fire had no way to pass through solid concrete slabs or curtain walls to invade the neighboring compartments. This does not even account for the fully functional sprinkler system that had to be turned off for these fires to spread any distance at all. Here is a four minute video to help gain a better perspective on how to weigh the evidence in this case:
Four Minute WTC-7 Collapse Video
Fire has never destroyed a steel building, but three steel buildings owned by Larry Silverstein were Pulled on 9/11. Pull it is controlled demolition lingo for wiring the building up and pulling it down. Mr. Silverstein was obviously lying about speaking to the New York Fire Chief, as the firemen only entered the scene on 9/11 after the Twin Towers attacks. This Fire Chief had no access to Controlled Demolition charges when he arrived at WTC-7 for Pulling down the 47-story steel-framed skyscraper that could possibly be placed in a single day. Here we have a few small fires burning on a few floors, but the Fire Chief cannot figure any way to extinguish them. Since the firemen had no time to set all the required charges to Pull WTC-7 down in just a few hours, as if firemen even have controlled demolition crews, then Mr. Silverstein just pointed the finger at himself about having prior knowledge of these 9/11 attacks. Now compare our images of WTC-7 and these Pull It videos:
Paris Building
Office Building
Landmark Tower Implosion
Many buildings have been demolished using controlled demolition looking exactly like WTC-7 on 9/11, but again, no steel-framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire in the history of this planet. Twenty-first century demolition techniques include the use of Thermite Shaped Charges found all over WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7.
Shaped Charges And The World Trade Center Collapses
The damage from a thermite/thermate shaped charge is exactly what you see above the confused firemans head. Note the size of the massive column and the molten iron residue that flowed inside and outside the column.
Thermite burns at a very high 2500 degrees Centigrade or 4532 degrees Fahrenheit, which represents the kind of temperature required to sever these massive red-iron columns. As a demolition supervisor (search "Terral") tearing down buildings for many years, I know of nobody using 45-degree angle cuts to remove any red-iron part of any conventional demolition job. This particular column has molten iron residue, which is a Controlled Demolition Signature, as any torch cut would blow the molten iron off the column entirely away from the worker. There is no cut from any torch that would leave molten iron residue on the inside and outside of 'all' the sides of a column this way. The idea that any demolition worker would make a 45-degree cut is ridiculous, because of the danger to other workers and the waste of fuel.
Another problem with the Official Fire Cover Story is these 45-degree angle shaped-charge cuts appear everywhere . . .
. . . even in locations where demolition crew workers could not possibly reach. The common practice is to remove steel debris in an orderly pick and remove manner, which eliminates the possibility of needlessly shifting weight and putting workers in danger. We play this dangerous game like a child plays Pickup Sticks, as any skilled demolition foreman can look at the pile and tell you which debris to remove first. None of the demolition workers in the picture above climbed up any ladder forty or fifty feet in the air to make that 45-degree angle cut, because that was part of the original Controlled Demolition (AE911Truth.org) of WTC-7. Note the clean 90-degree cuts labeled Severed Column End scattered throughout the debris pile. However, also note these steel members are buried under the debris of the walls collapsing upon them during the controlled demolition process. These cuts could not have been made by this demolition crew, because they still have mountains of debris to remove before even thinking about cutting any structural steel; which would only serve to shift weight in this very dangerous situation. The very best work on these WTC controlled demolition attacks is presented by Dr. Steven E. Jones (Brigham Young University) here:
Liberty Post Website:
WTC-7 was definitely (100 percent certainty) brought down using Controlled Demolition techniques also found in WTC-1 and WTC-2. This evidence explains why we have reports on hundreds of explosions taking place throughout the day.
9/11 Firemen Describe WTC Explosions
And yet, the keyword sanitized 911Commission Report only uses the term explosion six times outside the notation references for all these 9/11 cases combined and never uses the term explosions (plural) even once. Guess what? The bogus Arlington County After-Action Report uses the term explosion six times in 215 pages and also never uses the term explosions even one time the very same way, even though we can hear multiple explosions taking place in this single [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]WefPzgxvfS4[/MEDIA] Video[/ame].
9/11 was definitely an inside-job and many LIARS are helping the real terrorists get away with murdering thousands of our innocent fellow Americans. Let us see how many Official Cover Story LIARS line up to convince these readers that 9/11 was carried out by people like this (pic) and that building fires and debris took down these WTC skyscrapers . . .
GL,
Terral
terral so much took the shills and trolls to school on this that demolitions brought down the towers,these trolls like agent rightwinger cant stand toe to toe in this debate and always get their asses owned.LOL
Files relating to numerous federal investigations had been housed in 7 World Trade Center. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission estimated over 10,000 of its cases were affected.[50] Investigative files in the Secret Service's largest field office were lost, with one Secret Service agent saying, "All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building."[51] Copies of emails in connection with the WorldCom scandal that were later requested by the SEC from Salomon Brothers, a subsidiary of Citigroup housed in the building, were also destroyed.[52]
She took no one to school. Your nutty version isnt taught in schools.WTC-7 was not hit by a planeThere is no debate. The towers were taken down by planes, piloted by AQ terrorists, masterminded by OBL. Are you guys really STILL talking about this nonsense? This conspiracy is so old.Greetings to All:
All of the evidence points directly to inside-job terrorists taking down WTC-7 by Controlled Demolition on 9/11. WTC-7 was designed and built using Compartmentalization of all supporting columns and beams separated by solid concrete slabs horizontally and curtain walls vertically making death by fire an impossibility. A building fire has never destroyed a steel-framed skyscraper in US history before or after 9/11 and WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7 were owned by Larry Pull It Silverstein all suffering the same fate. Many fail to realize the World Trade Center Towers had never been in private hands prior to the summer of 2001, when Mr. Silverstein received possession from the New York Port Authority.
Cooperative Research Website:
Watch the [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]LD06SAf0p9A[/MEDIA] Collapse Video[/ame] again:
Use your curser to hold the round scrollbar and move WTC-7 up and down repeatedly. The roof section and the center of the building collapse first, then the two sides plummet at free fall velocity like any successful controlled demolition. Before looking at the details of how WTC-7 was built using Compartmentalization of all the steel supports, we need to take a look at the massive building itself.
All of the WTC-7 steel columns, beams, girders and bar joists were bolted down and welded together into a single unit creating literally thousands of connections that must be severed to cause the catastrophic failure seen from the aftermath of the attack.
The melting point of WTC-7 structural steel is 1535 degrees Celsius or 2795 degrees Fahrenheit. The first problem with the Fire Caused The Collapse Theory is that building fires burn between 800 and 1000 degrees Fahrenheit, or about one third the required temperature to melt structural steel. The second problem is that building fires typically burn for only 20 minutes in any given area, because the fuel is depleted and the fire moves in the direction of a fresh fuel source. The third problem is that steel is an excellent conductor of heat and any steel-framed network would disperse the heat much more quickly than any building fire could raise the temperature to anywhere near steel-softening temperatures. Another problem is that all supporting columns were coated with 3-hour spray-on fireproofing insulation, which is nine times more protection needed for the typical building fire; even if the required 2800 degree temperatures were reached.
911Research Website:
The website above is perhaps the best on the internet for discovering the truth about the WTC-7 collapse. Moving down the page, Figure 5-3 shows the massive steel network and how certain areas (floors 1-7, 22-24) received extra support.
This information is very important, because remember WTC-7 collapsed in one single smooth motion, which means extra attention was paid to placing charges to sever these thicker and stronger steel supports. Try to imagine the amount of energy required to break all of these connections simultaneously and you begin to see the building fire theory is certainly a hoax. Below you come to Figure 5.3.3 and descriptions of how WTC-7 was built in many separate compartments eliminating fire as even a remote possibility for causing this collapse.
Even if two or five or ten fires were started, the fuel source within those particular compartments would be consumed LONG before the fireproofing safety countermeasures were compromised; and the fire had no way to pass through solid concrete slabs or curtain walls to invade the neighboring compartments. This does not even account for the fully functional sprinkler system that had to be turned off for these fires to spread any distance at all. Here is a four minute video to help gain a better perspective on how to weigh the evidence in this case:
Four Minute WTC-7 Collapse Video
Fire has never destroyed a steel building, but three steel buildings owned by Larry Silverstein were Pulled on 9/11. Pull it is controlled demolition lingo for wiring the building up and pulling it down. Mr. Silverstein was obviously lying about speaking to the New York Fire Chief, as the firemen only entered the scene on 9/11 after the Twin Towers attacks. This Fire Chief had no access to Controlled Demolition charges when he arrived at WTC-7 for Pulling down the 47-story steel-framed skyscraper that could possibly be placed in a single day. Here we have a few small fires burning on a few floors, but the Fire Chief cannot figure any way to extinguish them. Since the firemen had no time to set all the required charges to Pull WTC-7 down in just a few hours, as if firemen even have controlled demolition crews, then Mr. Silverstein just pointed the finger at himself about having prior knowledge of these 9/11 attacks. Now compare our images of WTC-7 and these Pull It videos:
Paris Building
Office Building
Landmark Tower Implosion
Many buildings have been demolished using controlled demolition looking exactly like WTC-7 on 9/11, but again, no steel-framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire in the history of this planet. Twenty-first century demolition techniques include the use of Thermite Shaped Charges found all over WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7.
Shaped Charges And The World Trade Center Collapses
The damage from a thermite/thermate shaped charge is exactly what you see above the confused firemans head. Note the size of the massive column and the molten iron residue that flowed inside and outside the column.
Thermite burns at a very high 2500 degrees Centigrade or 4532 degrees Fahrenheit, which represents the kind of temperature required to sever these massive red-iron columns. As a demolition supervisor (search "Terral") tearing down buildings for many years, I know of nobody using 45-degree angle cuts to remove any red-iron part of any conventional demolition job. This particular column has molten iron residue, which is a Controlled Demolition Signature, as any torch cut would blow the molten iron off the column entirely away from the worker. There is no cut from any torch that would leave molten iron residue on the inside and outside of 'all' the sides of a column this way. The idea that any demolition worker would make a 45-degree cut is ridiculous, because of the danger to other workers and the waste of fuel.
Another problem with the Official Fire Cover Story is these 45-degree angle shaped-charge cuts appear everywhere . . .
. . . even in locations where demolition crew workers could not possibly reach. The common practice is to remove steel debris in an orderly pick and remove manner, which eliminates the possibility of needlessly shifting weight and putting workers in danger. We play this dangerous game like a child plays Pickup Sticks, as any skilled demolition foreman can look at the pile and tell you which debris to remove first. None of the demolition workers in the picture above climbed up any ladder forty or fifty feet in the air to make that 45-degree angle cut, because that was part of the original Controlled Demolition (AE911Truth.org) of WTC-7. Note the clean 90-degree cuts labeled Severed Column End scattered throughout the debris pile. However, also note these steel members are buried under the debris of the walls collapsing upon them during the controlled demolition process. These cuts could not have been made by this demolition crew, because they still have mountains of debris to remove before even thinking about cutting any structural steel; which would only serve to shift weight in this very dangerous situation. The very best work on these WTC controlled demolition attacks is presented by Dr. Steven E. Jones (Brigham Young University) here:
Liberty Post Website:
WTC-7 was definitely (100 percent certainty) brought down using Controlled Demolition techniques also found in WTC-1 and WTC-2. This evidence explains why we have reports on hundreds of explosions taking place throughout the day.
9/11 Firemen Describe WTC Explosions
And yet, the keyword sanitized 911Commission Report only uses the term explosion six times outside the notation references for all these 9/11 cases combined and never uses the term explosions (plural) even once. Guess what? The bogus Arlington County After-Action Report uses the term explosion six times in 215 pages and also never uses the term explosions even one time the very same way, even though we can hear multiple explosions taking place in this single [ame=[MEDIA=youtube]WefPzgxvfS4[/MEDIA] Video[/ame].
9/11 was definitely an inside-job and many LIARS are helping the real terrorists get away with murdering thousands of our innocent fellow Americans. Let us see how many Official Cover Story LIARS line up to convince these readers that 9/11 was carried out by people like this (pic) and that building fires and debris took down these WTC skyscrapers . . .
GL,
Terral
terral so much took the shills and trolls to school on this that demolitions brought down the towers,these trolls like agent rightwinger cant stand toe to toe in this debate and always get their asses owned.LOL
Files relating to numerous federal investigations had been housed in 7 World Trade Center. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission estimated over 10,000 of its cases were affected.[50] Investigative files in the Secret Service's largest field office were lost, with one Secret Service agent saying, "All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building."[51] Copies of emails in connection with the WorldCom scandal that were later requested by the SEC from Salomon Brothers, a subsidiary of Citigroup housed in the building, were also destroyed.[52]
you took them to school same as the OP did,the shills that have penetrated this thread and farted in here can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are after you just took them to school just like the OP did as well.
Go away troll.
