Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Instead of a "law against texting while driving" WHY NOT concentrated education showing WHY you shouldn't i.e. you can't stop your car at 50mph if you are looking at your phone!
Practical illustrations of "do unto others" would cut down the growing mentality of the need for a "cop on every corner"!
They get really, really angry when you bring up the obvious.And that perfectly explains the current entitlement mentality of the left. A bunch of bible-thumpers at heart.
It is weird how lefties talk the same way about Obama as righties do about Jesus.
Perfect, all powerful, all knowing, incapable of lying, impeccable morals, can't be bought by money, has no ego, etc.Now you've done it.
Not much has changed since he was outed as the left's messiah back in 2008.
I wouldn't join any political party. Personally, I think only the whiners identify with a party... they seem to have a need to be 'part' of something instead of thinking for themselves. This is, I appreciate, an overly harsh view of both parties but... based on some of the fucking morons on USMB that identify as Republican or Democrat, I couldn't join either.
I don't have issue with two parties. I do have issue with little difference between the two (more comparison than contrast between GWB and BHO, just for example).I wouldn't join any political party. Personally, I think only the whiners identify with a party... they seem to have a need to be 'part' of something instead of thinking for themselves. This is, I appreciate, an overly harsh view of both parties but... based on some of the fucking morons on USMB that identify as Republican or Democrat, I couldn't join either.
Although the two main parties in power today - Repubs and Dems - totally suck, I don't think you should dismiss the entire concept of a political party.
With a country this size, it would be nearly impossible to orchestrate a coordinated effort or a movement without somehow first summarizing your goals and values into some sort of understandable manifesto.
Don't blame the concept of a political party, blame the fact that we only have 2 parties to choose from.
I don't have issue with two parties. I do have issue with little difference between the two (more comparison than contrast between GWB and BHO, just for example).I wouldn't join any political party. Personally, I think only the whiners identify with a party... they seem to have a need to be 'part' of something instead of thinking for themselves. This is, I appreciate, an overly harsh view of both parties but... based on some of the fucking morons on USMB that identify as Republican or Democrat, I couldn't join either.
Although the two main parties in power today - Repubs and Dems - totally suck, I don't think you should dismiss the entire concept of a political party.
With a country this size, it would be nearly impossible to orchestrate a coordinated effort or a movement without somehow first summarizing your goals and values into some sort of understandable manifesto.
Don't blame the concept of a political party, blame the fact that we only have 2 parties to choose from.
In effect, we are a one-party state. And we know they are doomed and doomed quickly.
And the other has followed. The Tea Party slowed them down a bit, but here we are again.......I don't have issue with two parties. I do have issue with little difference between the two (more comparison than contrast between GWB and BHO, just for example).Although the two main parties in power today - Repubs and Dems - totally suck, I don't think you should dismiss the entire concept of a political party.
With a country this size, it would be nearly impossible to orchestrate a coordinated effort or a movement without somehow first summarizing your goals and values into some sort of understandable manifesto.
Don't blame the concept of a political party, blame the fact that we only have 2 parties to choose from.
In effect, we are a one-party state. And we know they are doomed and doomed quickly.
One is moving far left faster than the other...
And the other has followed. The Tea Party slowed them down a bit, but here we are again.......I don't have issue with two parties. I do have issue with little difference between the two (more comparison than contrast between GWB and BHO, just for example).
In effect, we are a one-party state. And we know they are doomed and doomed quickly.
One is moving far left faster than the other...
Worrying about dogs, cookies, etc.
I don't have issue with two parties. I do have issue with little difference between the two (more comparison than contrast between GWB and BHO, just for example).Although the two main parties in power today - Repubs and Dems - totally suck, I don't think you should dismiss the entire concept of a political party.
With a country this size, it would be nearly impossible to orchestrate a coordinated effort or a movement without somehow first summarizing your goals and values into some sort of understandable manifesto.
Don't blame the concept of a political party, blame the fact that we only have 2 parties to choose from.
In effect, we are a one-party state. And we know they are doomed and doomed quickly.
One is moving far left faster than the other...
The Constitution Party, a third party that calls for restoring government "on the Gospel of Jesus Christ."
Seems like two separate issues, 1) restoring gov't to the constitutional intent and values, and 2) basing gov't on christanity, which circumvents the 1st amendment. Wouldn't hurt to try to stick to the 1st issue a little more closely, but not the 2nd. I don't care if people put up crosses in cemetaries, or manger scenes at Christmas time, or use the word God in any way they want to. But we can't be requiring everyone to follow the dictates of any particular religion.
Correct...Great Britain as alot of EU countries of the period had an official church that dominated...and determined the Social-Cast systems...and why so many fled here to escape it to worship as they chose.
The Constitution ensured that Government could not make any law on the practice of religion of any citizen...nor would the Government conduct itself on behalf of any religion...and at the same time speech by any citizen in government or private citizen could freely speak as they chose.
Key here is to protect and defend the Constitution regardless of such speech BY elected officials.
To go with a party whose stated purpose is to Govern BY religious principles (as stated BY the OP) is WRONG...
But do they really state what the OP said?
In a way? They did...but in reference getting back to the ideals of the Founders.
I think the OP is being a bit disingenuous...and do NOTE SHE failed to offer up thier platform.
SO...I LINK IT for all to read...make up your own mind...
Constitution Party Platform
The Constitution Party, a third party that calls for restoring government "on the Gospel of Jesus Christ."
Id have to have more information on what they meant when they said this. From what Ive studied on the Constitutionalist party, Ive never been impressed with their Constitutionalist principles and they are vague what they mean about the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I dont claim to be an expert though.
Instead of a "law against texting while driving" WHY NOT concentrated education showing WHY you shouldn't i.e. you can't stop your car at 50mph if you are looking at your phone!
Practical illustrations of "do unto others" would cut down the growing mentality of the need for a "cop on every corner"!
When I was in school there was a concentrated effort to teach us that killing, stealing and lying were wrong. I guess we don't need laws against those actions, then. If education alone worked, we'd have a perfect society. We need the laws, because some people don't get the message without a kick in the pants.
Whats wrong with Jesus?
Why do I get the feeling that the OP would have been one of the ones who screamed to free the murderer and crucify the Christ...
Boop got personally offended when she read an article that had Americans who would dare speak ill of The Obama, so this thread is her counter attack. The purpose of the thread is to make anyone who isn't an Obamabot appear to be a loon.
She did? Why am I always the last to know?
Which thread is that, by the way. I'd really like some background, so I can take proper offense.
Your existence HERE is offensive.
the constitution party, a third party that calls for restoring government "on the gospel of jesus christ."
oh
hell
no!
Didn't you notice until later the OP didn't post the Platform until she was coerced?
