Would the Keystone Pipeline be a great economic asset to the United States? Hardly.

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Billy000, Jan 2, 2012.

  1. Billy000
    Online

    Billy000 Democratic Socialist

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,203
    Thanks Received:
    1,251
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +4,334
    Obama had it right.

    According to an independent study conducted by Cornell University Global Labor Institute, the claims of a significant economic boost to the US economy as a result of the pipeline are quite exaggerated. Here is a summary of their findings:


    http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/globallaborinstitute/research/upload/GLI_KeystoneXL_Reportpdf.pdf
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2012
  2. FactFinder
    Offline

    FactFinder VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,641
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +237
    the claims of a significant economic boost to the US economy as a result of the pipeline are quite exaggerated.

    That is funny.! Of course they are. Who the hell do you think spins the news these day?
     
  3. Billy000
    Online

    Billy000 Democratic Socialist

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,203
    Thanks Received:
    1,251
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +4,334
    Tell that to the critics of Obama on here.
     
  4. code1211
    Offline

    code1211 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    5,999
    Thanks Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +845


    So, just to be clear, we have a job being planned that will create between 5000 jobs on the low end and 20,000 on the high end and you say skip it because you want more? Want less? Don't care? Don't accept that there's a problem with creating jobs?

    I don't understand your objection.

    Any job like a pipeline job will support 3 others. So we are looking at 15,000 on the low end to 60,000 on the high end.

    Also, more oil coming to market will reduce the cost per gallon for gas. We were paying about $1.80 in 2008 and now we covet the $3.00 level.

    Why would anyone be against any of this? More jobs, lower gas prices and more gas.

    What's the downside?
     
  5. Billy000
    Online

    Billy000 Democratic Socialist

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,203
    Thanks Received:
    1,251
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +4,334
    Where the hell are you getting these numbers from? Did you even read my OP?
     
  6. Two Thumbs
    Offline

    Two Thumbs Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    33,450
    Thanks Received:
    5,786
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Where ever I go, there I am.
    Ratings:
    +11,589
    Ok, I'll pretend Cornell is independent and play along.

    Lets see; The project will create no more than 2,500-4,650. That's an average of over 3000 people with a job, instead of Zero, which is what we got.

    There is strong evidence to suggest that a large portion of the primary material
    input for KXL—steel pipe—will not even be produced in the United States. A
    substantial amount of pipe has already been manufactured in advance of pipeline
    permit issuance. It's called importing. And we will have to pay people to transport the material. ooo, more jobs, which is more that Zero.



    And heaven forbid we get oil from somewhere other than the ME.

    :cuckoo:

    Oh, and those would have been union jobs. So, why do you hate the unions?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. Billy000
    Online

    Billy000 Democratic Socialist

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    11,203
    Thanks Received:
    1,251
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Location:
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +4,334
    You aren't reading the article. These 3000 some jobs would only be temporary, and gas prices would increase. The environmentalists win this argument.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2012
  8. Two Thumbs
    Offline

    Two Thumbs Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    33,450
    Thanks Received:
    5,786
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Where ever I go, there I am.
    Ratings:
    +11,589
    So you think the pipline won't need to be maintained after it's built?

    and incase you have not noticed, gas prices have gone up your entire life.
     
  9. Stephanie
    Offline

    Stephanie Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    70,236
    Thanks Received:
    10,817
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +27,359
    I'd be ashamed to have posted this article and say, Obama was right..
     
  10. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    You gotta love this. Out of every productive project you could possibly have going, like high speed rail, developing new energy sources or infrastructure spending..the one's conservatives advocate for..is mining old technology. It's a wonderful thing too. Lets put pipeline pumping environmentally destructive substances through environmentally sensitive regions. Makes a great deal of sense. And it's from an industry that is constantly crying wolf to get it's way. Which makes this country do incredibly stupid things, like topple governments and go to war.

    President Obama should tell these folks to go pound sand.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page