Would Jesus condemn or condone Yahweh for his crimes against humanity?

.
the honest truth is the triumph over evil each individual need accomplish themselves for their own redemption and Admission to the Everlasting.
So you've never lied. You never took anything? You never wished someone ill? You sold everything you possessed and followed after GOD? You sound like the rich young ruler that Jesus talked to... And he walked away very sad.
.
So you've never lied. You never took anything? You never wished someone ill? You sold everything you possessed and followed after GOD? You sound like the rich young ruler that Jesus talked to... And he walked away very sad.

- the honest truth is the triumph over evil each individual need accomplish themselves for their own redemption and Admission to the Everlasting.


I stopped sinning long ago nipper, hopefully you would find it rewarding if you did the same yourself and it is not that hard to do. no doubt temptation lurks past every corner ... a final triumph or Sabbath I am sure is more than just not sinning.

the triumph of good vs evil, the religion of Antiquity ends in a state of purity if accomplished from in most cases a mixed beginning so yes it is possible to have sinned in the past. there is no mention of a christ doing it for someone as it would make no sense and the final judgement is not for one individual but for the humanity that remains to the end.
 
Would the lover condemn the hater Yahweh?

Regards
DL
The Lover was sent to save and not condemn. Everyone is already condemned because of their fallen nature due to the curse of Adam. The ONLY hope is to trust in Christ as the perfect eternal sacrificial lamb..

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is our only hope.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

You might want to read your bible some time.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL

Regards
DL
Animal blood sacrifice atoned Israelite sin. Jesus blood covers in The Nt--repented sin.

You have no clue as to how the sacrifice in the Jewish religion works. You might want to read about it instead of looking the fool.

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is prescribed as good in scriptures.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL



I didn't say that about Jesus. The guy who looks like a serpent did. The guy who is standing in opposition to the true God at satans right hand. The picture fits you perfect.

You did not but that is what you are implying.

Repent.

Regards
DL
 
Would the lover condemn the hater Yahweh?

Regards
DL
The Lover was sent to save and not condemn. Everyone is already condemned because of their fallen nature due to the curse of Adam. The ONLY hope is to trust in Christ as the perfect eternal sacrificial lamb..

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is our only hope.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

You might want to read your bible some time.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL

Regards
DL
Animal blood sacrifice atoned Israelite sin. Jesus blood covers in The Nt--repented sin.

You have no clue as to how the sacrifice in the Jewish religion works. You might want to read about it instead of looking the fool.

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is prescribed as good in scriptures.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL
Sacrifices are good. Haven’t you ever sacrificed anything for the good of someone else?

Sure, but I did not cause the initial harm (condemnation) then try to make myself look like a hero by saving the day.

If you praise god's ways, you show how your beliefs have corrupted your morals.

I would not be surprised given your I.Q. and religions manipulative lying ways.

Regards
DL
 
Jesus is dead. Doesn’t matter what he would do.

Jesus/Yahweh is dead? An immortal god died?

Given his satanic morals, let us thank all the gods that that prick is dead.
Death could not happen to a nicer genocidal son murderer.

Regards
DL
 
Triune GOD: Father, Manager ---- Director
SON/Messiah/Christ: Lover of operations ---- Carried out the plan
HOLY SPIRIT ---- is the worker, comforter

Would the lover condemn the hater Yahweh?

Regards
DL
The Lover was sent to save and not condemn. Everyone is already condemned because of their fallen nature due to the curse of Adam. The ONLY hope is to trust in Christ as the perfect eternal sacrificial lamb..

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is our only hope.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

You might want to read your bible some time.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral ---- by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL

Regards
DL
Jesus is not immoral. The one thief beside Him on the cross came to understand that reality --- and what did Jesus promise him? "TODAY you shall be with Me in paradise."

You forget about Jesus' 3 day R & R in hell.

Oh wait. They left out the pit stop.

How you can believe such ridiculous supernaturalstupid B.S. is beyond me.

Regards
DL
 
The Lover was sent to save and not condemn. Everyone is already condemned because of their fallen nature due to the curse of Adam. The ONLY hope is to trust in Christ as the perfect eternal sacrificial lamb..

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is our only hope.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

You might want to read your bible some time.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL

Regards
DL
Animal blood sacrifice atoned Israelite sin. Jesus blood covers in The Nt--repented sin.

You have no clue as to how the sacrifice in the Jewish religion works. You might want to read about it instead of looking the fool.

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is prescribed as good in scriptures.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL
Sacrifices are good. Haven’t you ever sacrificed anything for the good of someone else?

Sure, but I did not cause the initial harm (condemnation) then try to make myself look like a hero by saving the day.

If you praise god's ways, you show how your beliefs have corrupted your morals.

I would not be surprised given your I.Q. and religions manipulative lying ways.

Regards
DL
^dunning effect

Neither did he. You lack understanding.
 
Triune GOD: Father, Manager ---- Director
SON/Messiah/Christ: Lover of operations ---- Carried out the plan
HOLY SPIRIT ---- is the worker, comforter

Would the lover condemn the hater Yahweh?

Regards
DL
The Lover was sent to save and not condemn. Everyone is already condemned because of their fallen nature due to the curse of Adam. The ONLY hope is to trust in Christ as the perfect eternal sacrificial lamb..

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is our only hope.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

You might want to read your bible some time.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL

Regards
DL
Animal blood sacrifice atoned Israelite sin. Jesus blood covers in The Nt--repented sin.
The animal sacrifices were a mere illustration of what the Messiah accomplished on the cross. An animal is not perfect nor does it give its life freely.



God accepted animal blood sacrifice for sin in the OT as long as they repented.
 
The Lover was sent to save and not condemn. Everyone is already condemned because of their fallen nature due to the curse of Adam. The ONLY hope is to trust in Christ as the perfect eternal sacrificial lamb..

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is our only hope.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

You might want to read your bible some time.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL

Regards
DL
Animal blood sacrifice atoned Israelite sin. Jesus blood covers in The Nt--repented sin.

You have no clue as to how the sacrifice in the Jewish religion works. You might want to read about it instead of looking the fool.

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is prescribed as good in scriptures.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL
Sacrifices are good. Haven’t you ever sacrificed anything for the good of someone else?

Sure, but I did not cause the initial harm (condemnation) then try to make myself look like a hero by saving the day.

If you praise god's ways, you show how your beliefs have corrupted your morals.

I would not be surprised given your I.Q. and religions manipulative lying ways.

Regards
DL


Any who have read the bible know-mortals have no choice in the matter. Either one stands for God or belong to satan. Sin = worship to satan. It has to be this way. God is always correct. You don't know a tiny bit of what he knows. His kingdom will cure it all.
 
Triune GOD: Father, Manager ---- Director
SON/Messiah/Christ: Lover of operations ---- Carried out the plan
HOLY SPIRIT ---- is the worker, comforter

Would the lover condemn the hater Yahweh?

Regards
DL
The Lover was sent to save and not condemn. Everyone is already condemned because of their fallen nature due to the curse of Adam. The ONLY hope is to trust in Christ as the perfect eternal sacrificial lamb..

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is our only hope.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

You might want to read your bible some time.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral ---- by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL

Regards
DL
Jesus is not immoral. The one thief beside Him on the cross came to understand that reality --- and what did Jesus promise him? "TODAY you shall be with Me in paradise."

You forget about Jesus' 3 day R & R in hell.

Oh wait. They left out the pit stop.

How you can believe such ridiculous supernaturalstupid B.S. is beyond me.

Regards
DL
It was observed by a very large number of people. And those that documented the event often did so at the peril of pain, suffering and death. And yet they went willingly. No one would do this for a lie --- no sane person. And I see nothing in the New Testament that proves them to be incoherent raving maniacs. However, I do note that some here rave and nag and rial endlessly that Jesus never existed, that He didn't rise from the dead, and that the Bible is without any facts whatsoever... You tell me which is sane and which is idiotic!
 
Would Jesus condemn or condone Yahweh for his crimes against humanity?

I see more than one Jesus speaking through the bible. The good Jesus would likely condemn while the less moral and good Jesus that most follow might not. A number of his policies have been found wanting, --- in moral terms.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUfGRN4HVrQ

Dogma says that Jesus ascended to heaven and his rightful place as judge of the universe at Yahweh’s right hand. The pure hand says tradition.

Would Jesus dethrone Yahweh for the insane genocidal example he shows for a god, or would Jesus somehow justify what Yahweh, and himself to Trinitarians, did?

Would Jesus say that genocide was good?

Heaven forbid.

Condemn or Condone?

I say Jesus would condemn Yahweh.

What say you my moral friends?



Regards
DL[/QUOTE
i


Jesus is Jehovah.
And I can prove it from the Bible
 
Jesus is dead. Doesn’t matter what he would do.
Jesus arose and His tomb is empty. And He was seen by over 500!

Do you have a video?
I have multiple documents ---- what do you have?

Common sense
So you say ---- your values, your opinions, your views, your judgments.

So you don't have common sense? LOL
 
Would the lover condemn the hater Yahweh?

Regards
DL
The Lover was sent to save and not condemn. Everyone is already condemned because of their fallen nature due to the curse of Adam. The ONLY hope is to trust in Christ as the perfect eternal sacrificial lamb..

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is our only hope.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

You might want to read your bible some time.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL

Regards
DL
Animal blood sacrifice atoned Israelite sin. Jesus blood covers in The Nt--repented sin.
The animal sacrifices were a mere illustration of what the Messiah accomplished on the cross. An animal is not perfect nor does it give its life freely.



God accepted animal blood sacrifice for sin in the OT as long as they repented.

I see a lie.

You know anything about god first hand, how?

Mysterious, unfathomable, unknowable, those are all implied in your bible and bely your statement.

Repent.

Regards
DL
 
These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is our only hope.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

You might want to read your bible some time.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL

Regards
DL
Animal blood sacrifice atoned Israelite sin. Jesus blood covers in The Nt--repented sin.

You have no clue as to how the sacrifice in the Jewish religion works. You might want to read about it instead of looking the fool.

These bely your idea that a barbaric human sacrifice is prescribed as good in scriptures.

2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

1 Samuel 15;22 Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

Jesus would not break his own Jewish teaching.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Stop trying to say that Jesus/Yahweh is an immoral prick by asking us to accept that the punishment of the innocent instead of the guilty is somehow just and good.

Regards
DL
Sacrifices are good. Haven’t you ever sacrificed anything for the good of someone else?

Sure, but I did not cause the initial harm (condemnation) then try to make myself look like a hero by saving the day.

If you praise god's ways, you show how your beliefs have corrupted your morals.

I would not be surprised given your I.Q. and religions manipulative lying ways.

Regards
DL


Any who have read the bible know-mortals have no choice in the matter. Either one stands for God or belong to satan. Sin = worship to satan. It has to be this way. God is always correct. You don't know a tiny bit of what he knows. His kingdom will cure it all.

See my last to you and repent again for talking out of your ass and putting words in your genocidal son murdering demiurge's mouth.

Regards
DL
 

Forum List

Back
Top