Soggy in NOLA
Diamond Member
- Jul 31, 2009
- 40,565
- 5,358
- 1,830
Should have went with Sugar Cane like the Brazilians..but what can ya do?
How about burning, I dunno... GASOLINE?
Why do we have to burn food?
Just dumb.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Should have went with Sugar Cane like the Brazilians..but what can ya do?
NEWS FLASH!!! - Ethanol plants produce a co-product. It is called animal feed DDGS (Distillers Dried Grains) You take feed corn to the ethanol plants & you get back both food & fuel!!!
Cattle that would have eaten the corn grain and soybean meal to supplement their diet, now eat distillers grains as that part of their balanced diet. Equal or better performance (rates of gain for beef cattle or milk yield in dairy cows) are usually reported from cows with up to 20% of their diet from distillers grains are compared with control diets.
Ethanol is only made from the starch in the corn. DDGS contain all the protein that was in the corn. Protein is what builds muscle, not starch. Muscles = Hamburger. The corn starch caused methane in cattle that was released into the atmosphere. It was not making beef, hamburgers, steaks or milk. Methane gas is 15 times more powerful of a greenhouse gas than CO2. Now this starch is converted into ethanol instead of methane gas.
Bernanke's printing press is what is driving up cotton, corn, oil & metals prices. All commodities have risen big-time in price. Even the price of water (the most plentiful comodity) is going up.
It is a good deal that you get double use out of the corn but.......the cows would have eaten the corn before it was used to make ethanol anyway.
And it still takes more energy to produce then what you get out of it.
But I suppose we could always stand to have less cow farts.
All in all still a bad idea.
Should have went with Sugar Cane like the Brazilians..but what can ya do?
that would drive up the commodity prices on sugar and of course would result in higher food prices here and abroad.
Should have went with Sugar Cane like the Brazilians..but what can ya do?
How about burning, I dunno... GASOLINE?
Why do we have to burn food?
Just dumb.
No. It wasn't a stupid idea. It was a great idea - but it failed. Sometimes, even great ideas fail.
I'm glad someone tried to find an alternative to gasoline. In this case it didn't work, and we need to give up, and stop subsidizing it to the tune of 7 billion dollars a year.
But we should keep trying.
On what planet is burning food for fuel while people are starving a great idea?
You keep saying we need to find an alternative fuel, but there is nothing wrong with the fuel we are using now. You just won't let us get it.
That's false.
Remember what BP was doing when that well blew up. They were capping it. They weren't even going to pump it.
Should have went with Sugar Cane like the Brazilians..but what can ya do?
How about burning, I dunno... GASOLINE?
Why do we have to burn food?
Just dumb.
What's dumb is NOT developing new sources of fuel. And you don't do that sitting on your hands.
Should have went with Sugar Cane like the Brazilians..but what can ya do?
How about burning, I dunno... GASOLINE?
Why do we have to burn food?
Just dumb.
Can't friggin grow it here, for one thing.Should have went with Sugar Cane like the Brazilians..but what can ya do?
Should have went with Sugar Cane like the Brazilians..but what can ya do?
How about burning, I dunno... GASOLINE?
Why do we have to burn food?
Just dumb.
I dunno, cause gasoline isn't going to be around much longer? We hit peak oil in the 70s and now we are just scrambling for the scraps. Time to stop sucking on the oil teat.
Now...Hemp produces 10 times as much methanol as corn does. Shame we aren't planting hemp crops...
Should have went with Sugar Cane like the Brazilians..but what can ya do?
How about burning, I dunno... GASOLINE?
Why do we have to burn food?
Just dumb.
I dunno, cause gasoline isn't going to be around much longer? We hit peak oil in the 70s and now we are just scrambling for the scraps. Time to stop sucking on the oil teat.
Now...Hemp produces 10 times as much methanol as corn does. Shame we aren't planting hemp crops...
I'd reread what Kissmy is saying....
I used to think ethanol was the stupidest idea in the world and was pissed as heck with congress....after reading a post of Kissmy's in the past and doing further research on it, I have changed my mind.
In fact, it is probably the first time anyone has ever changed my mind on anything....at USMB.
I still think the subsidies need to stop, but ethanol is not the complete waste of food, as I once thought.
I'd reread what Kissmy is saying....
I used to think ethanol was the stupidest idea in the world and was pissed as heck with congress....after reading a post of Kissmy's in the past and doing further research on it, I have changed my mind.
In fact, it is probably the first time anyone has ever changed my mind on anything....at USMB.
I still think the subsidies need to stop, but ethanol is not the complete waste of food, as I once thought.
Everything in moderation.
We should use all the good ideas listed.. including hemp for diesel.
Its just this idea that petroleum is a bad thing is just plain idiotic and silly. There is NO shortage of it, and when used in moderation... the sky is the limit.
Oh, and I will go there if nobody else will.... why not build more nuclear power plants? That way we can keep more of our fossil fuels for powering other parts of our lives.
World starves as Americans burn food to stay on the road | The Australian
I hate to say I told you so, but burning corn for Ethenol was a really stupid idea.
No. It wasn't a stupid idea. It was a great idea - but it failed. Sometimes, even great ideas fail.
I'm glad someone tried to find an alternative to gasoline. In this case it didn't work, and we need to give up, and stop subsidizing it to the tune of 7 billion dollars a year.
But we should keep trying.