Trojan
Member
You don't even comprehend how hearsay evidence works. Last time. Ted claims he spoke with his wife and she said "X." The hearsay is NOT that Ted was on the phone you fucking twat. The hearsay is what HE HEARD. No wonder you believe Dubya. You don't have the first fucking clue on how to think critically.
HAhahahaah!!!
fucking classic. you change your position to my position on what hearsay evidence is after i explain it to you.
then you change your claim from "the phone calls are hearsay" to the correct definition that the content of the conversation is hearsay not that the conversation had taken place.
so now you admit that there is evidence that calls from flight 77 did take place and it isnt hearsay.
thanks!!
have a nice holiday and i hope santa brings you the extra large butt plug you have been hoping for.
You are one stupid shitball. People have been claiming the phone calls are evidence of the hijacking. I pointed out that was hearsay evidence based on the lack of confirmation the calls came from flight 77. I never said Ted never talked on the phone you worthless whiny twat. Once again you talk about butts.......you're too fucking ridiculously dumb.
When a person talks about their own experiences , including a conversation they had, it is not hearsay, it is eyewitness evidence.
Hearsay is when you repeat what someone else told you that they witnessed -- if Ted Olsen told me about his experience, my testimony would be hearsay, his testimony is direct evidence.
thank you for playing wack a twoofer