" World Council of Churches" condemn expulsion of Christians

More meaningless propaganda. Every group that governed there, from the Arabs who conquered the land shortly after Muhammad's death, the Mamelukes, Mongols, crusaders, Turks, British representing the League of Nations and the UN and the Jordanians, built extensively there and significant numbers of their populations moved there and built homes to run the government and business enterprises they built there.

Every government seizes land at times for public works or to put it to more productive use, and those who benefit from these projects are often not those who lived there previously. Israeli towns and cities and farms and businesses and schools and hospitals and parks and highways in Judea and Samaria are no more illegal than US highway projects that run through residential areas in the US or US urban renewal projects that level older neighborhoods to make way for newer ones.

And it is nonsense to argue that the so called settlements only benefit Israelis. Some thirty thousand Arabs from Judea and Samaria work in the settlements, many in construction, and these are higher paying jobs than they could get from the Arab economy, and many more jobs are created there when Arab businesses sell their produce and manufactures to Israelis living in Judea and Samaria. Some few Arabs may have been forced to sell their land to make way for the settlements, but thousands of Arabs have benefited from the economic activity they brought to the area.

Indeed, wherever economic progress is taking place, some people are being displaced from land to make way for public works or to put the land to more productive use and this is as true everywhere else in the ME as it is in Judea and Samaria, and everywhere this takes place, those displaced complain about the unfairness of the process, but if Israel were run by Muslim Arabs instead of by Jews, not one of it actions would be subjected to international scrutiny or criticism or even to a raised eyebrow on the Arab street.

goofy!
so if joos decide to build an ethnic homeland in Florida or 52th state, they would have the right to expel florida citizens and build their crappy kibboutz? right?

you are a genius.

we are governed by International Law while you preferred live under Jugle law. :clap2:

There are no relevant international laws regarding either the establishment of the state of Israel or its efforts to find sustainable resolutions to the problems the Europeans and the Arabs have created in Judea and Samaria and there are certainly no jungles in the ME. Perhaps in your fantasies whenever you have a strong emotion laws are instantly created to validate them, but that doesn't happen in the world where the rest of us live.

In the partition resolution the UN dissolved its protectorate over what was left of the Mandate, land west of the Jordan River, meaning that land was now unincorporated in any existing political entity. Both the Jews and the Arabs who lived there wanted to create states of own on that land, but in the struggle that ensued, while the Jews managed to capture and hold the land that is now Israel, Egypt and Jordan captured the rest and refused to allow the Arabs who lived there to establish a state of their own. Hence the state of Israel exists and the state of Palestine does not because the Arab nations prevented its establishment.

Following the Six Day War in 1967, responsibility for the presently disputed territories, Judea and Samaria, fell to Israel and this transfer of responsibility was formalized in the peace treaties Israel signed with Jordan and Egypt and has been recognized by the UN. While some may dislike some of Israel's actions in the territories, as a matter of policy, no international laws are being violated; indeed, no relevant international laws exist.

If Jews or any other group tried to establish a new nation in Florida, the US would use whatever force was necessary to stop them, just as the state of Israel has been using whatever force has been necessary to prevent the Arabs from establishing a new state in place of the Jewish state of Israel.

Incorrect. Both the San Remo Resolution and Palestine Mandate establishing Palestine as the Jewish National Home are treaties that constitute international law.
 
More meaningless propaganda. Every group that governed there, from the Arabs who conquered the land shortly after Muhammad's death, the Mamelukes, Mongols, crusaders, Turks, British representing the League of Nations and the UN and the Jordanians, built extensively there and significant numbers of their populations moved there and built homes to run the government and business enterprises they built there.

Every government seizes land at times for public works or to put it to more productive use, and those who benefit from these projects are often not those who lived there previously. Israeli towns and cities and farms and businesses and schools and hospitals and parks and highways in Judea and Samaria are no more illegal than US highway projects that run through residential areas in the US or US urban renewal projects that level older neighborhoods to make way for newer ones.

And it is nonsense to argue that the so called settlements only benefit Israelis. Some thirty thousand Arabs from Judea and Samaria work in the settlements, many in construction, and these are higher paying jobs than they could get from the Arab economy, and many more jobs are created there when Arab businesses sell their produce and manufactures to Israelis living in Judea and Samaria. Some few Arabs may have been forced to sell their land to make way for the settlements, but thousands of Arabs have benefited from the economic activity they brought to the area.

Indeed, wherever economic progress is taking place, some people are being displaced from land to make way for public works or to put the land to more productive use and this is as true everywhere else in the ME as it is in Judea and Samaria, and everywhere this takes place, those displaced complain about the unfairness of the process, but if Israel were run by Muslim Arabs instead of by Jews, not one of it actions would be subjected to international scrutiny or criticism or even to a raised eyebrow on the Arab street.

goofy!
so if joos decide to build an ethnic homeland in Florida or 52th state, they would have the right to expel florida citizens and build their crappy kibboutz? right?

you are a genius.

we are governed by International Law while you preferred live under Jugle law. :clap2:

There are no relevant international laws regarding either the establishment of the state of Israel or its efforts to find sustainable resolutions to the problems the Europeans and the Arabs have created in Judea and Samaria and there are certainly no jungles in the ME. Perhaps in your fantasies whenever you have a strong emotion laws are instantly created to validate them, but that doesn't happen in the world where the rest of us live.

In the partition resolution the UN dissolved its protectorate over what was left of the Mandate, land west of the Jordan River, meaning that land was now unincorporated in any existing political entity. Both the Jews and the Arabs who lived there wanted to create states of own on that land, but in the struggle that ensued, while the Jews managed to capture and hold the land that is now Israel, Egypt and Jordan captured the rest and refused to allow the Arabs who lived there to establish a state of their own. Hence the state of Israel exists and the state of Palestine does not because the Arab nations prevented its establishment.

Following the Six Day War in 1967, responsibility for the presently disputed territories, Judea and Samaria, fell to Israel and this transfer of responsibility was formalized in the peace treaties Israel signed with Jordan and Egypt and has been recognized by the UN. While some may dislike some of Israel's actions in the territories, as a matter of policy, no international laws are being violated; indeed, no relevant international laws exist.

If Jews or any other group tried to establish a new nation in Florida, the US would use whatever force was necessary to stop them, just as the state of Israel has been using whatever force has been necessary to prevent the Arabs from establishing a new state in place of the Jewish state of Israel.

It's the UN you talked about which consider West bank occupied by foreigners

un_res_chart.gif
 
goofy!
so if joos decide to build an ethnic homeland in Florida or 52th state, they would have the right to expel florida citizens and build their crappy kibboutz? right?

you are a genius.

we are governed by International Law while you preferred live under Jugle law. :clap2:

There are no relevant international laws regarding either the establishment of the state of Israel or its efforts to find sustainable resolutions to the problems the Europeans and the Arabs have created in Judea and Samaria and there are certainly no jungles in the ME. Perhaps in your fantasies whenever you have a strong emotion laws are instantly created to validate them, but that doesn't happen in the world where the rest of us live.

In the partition resolution the UN dissolved its protectorate over what was left of the Mandate, land west of the Jordan River, meaning that land was now unincorporated in any existing political entity. Both the Jews and the Arabs who lived there wanted to create states of own on that land, but in the struggle that ensued, while the Jews managed to capture and hold the land that is now Israel, Egypt and Jordan captured the rest and refused to allow the Arabs who lived there to establish a state of their own. Hence the state of Israel exists and the state of Palestine does not because the Arab nations prevented its establishment.

Following the Six Day War in 1967, responsibility for the presently disputed territories, Judea and Samaria, fell to Israel and this transfer of responsibility was formalized in the peace treaties Israel signed with Jordan and Egypt and has been recognized by the UN. While some may dislike some of Israel's actions in the territories, as a matter of policy, no international laws are being violated; indeed, no relevant international laws exist.

If Jews or any other group tried to establish a new nation in Florida, the US would use whatever force was necessary to stop them, just as the state of Israel has been using whatever force has been necessary to prevent the Arabs from establishing a new state in place of the Jewish state of Israel.

It's the UN you talked about which consider West bank occupied by foreigners

un_res_chart.gif

Only in your fantasies.
 
t's the UN you talked about which consider West bank occupied by foreigners

un_res_chart.gif

Except, not one UN resolution against Israel, which are politically motivated, anyway, is legally binding.

Therefore, you are, once, again, PWNED. LOL
 
There are no relevant international laws regarding either the establishment of the state of Israel or its efforts to find sustainable resolutions to the problems the Europeans and the Arabs have created in Judea and Samaria and there are certainly no jungles in the ME. Perhaps in your fantasies whenever you have a strong emotion laws are instantly created to validate them, but that doesn't happen in the world where the rest of us live.

In the partition resolution the UN dissolved its protectorate over what was left of the Mandate, land west of the Jordan River, meaning that land was now unincorporated in any existing political entity. Both the Jews and the Arabs who lived there wanted to create states of own on that land, but in the struggle that ensued, while the Jews managed to capture and hold the land that is now Israel, Egypt and Jordan captured the rest and refused to allow the Arabs who lived there to establish a state of their own. Hence the state of Israel exists and the state of Palestine does not because the Arab nations prevented its establishment.

Following the Six Day War in 1967, responsibility for the presently disputed territories, Judea and Samaria, fell to Israel and this transfer of responsibility was formalized in the peace treaties Israel signed with Jordan and Egypt and has been recognized by the UN. While some may dislike some of Israel's actions in the territories, as a matter of policy, no international laws are being violated; indeed, no relevant international laws exist.

If Jews or any other group tried to establish a new nation in Florida, the US would use whatever force was necessary to stop them, just as the state of Israel has been using whatever force has been necessary to prevent the Arabs from establishing a new state in place of the Jewish state of Israel.

It's the UN you talked about which consider West bank occupied by foreigners

un_res_chart.gif

Only in your fantasies.

NO, it's only your fantaisies and likoud agenda...
ALL countries and international organisations consider West Bank occupied territories.

UN resolutions Israel has not complied with
 
It's the UN you talked about which consider West bank occupied by foreigners

un_res_chart.gif

Only in your fantasies.

NO, it's only your fantaisies and likoud agenda...
ALL countries and international organisations consider West Bank occupied territories.

UN resolutions Israel has not complied with

Dummy, every UN resolution issued against Israel is non-binding and, thus, not worth the paper they're printed on and need not be complied with.

You are PWNED, again, pinhead.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top